This study asks two questions: (1) Do older adults modify their language based on age of the listener (audience design)? (2) Does social contact affect audience design in older adults? Older adults (n = 34; mean age = 82) engaged in an instructions task with two fictive listeners (a child and an adult) to test these questions. Results show that older adults used a greater total number of propositions and rapport-building devices and a lower type–token ratio when giving instructions to the child compared to the adult listener. Adults with more social interactions used more propositions when talking to a child. In addition, satisfaction with interactions was significantly positively related to task-tracking devices and negatively related to rapport-building devices by older adults. These results suggest that audience design and social relations are worth further study in language maintenance in older age.
AdamsC.SmithM.PasupathiM.VitoloL. (2002). Social context effects on story recall in older and younger women: Does the listener make a difference?Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 57, 28–40.
2.
ArbuckleT. Y.Pushkar GoldD. (1993). Aging, inhibition, and verbosity. Journals of Gerontology, 48, P225–P232.
3.
BarnesL.Mendes de LeonC.WilsonR.BieniasJ.EvansD. (2004). Social resources and cognitive decline in a population of older African Americans and whites. Neurology, 63, 2322–2326.
4.
BassukS.GlassT.BerkmanL. (1999). Social disengagement and incident cognitive decline in community-dwelling elderly persons. Annals of Internal Medicine, 131, 165–173.
5.
BellA. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145–204.
6.
BellA. (2007). Style and the linguistic repertoire. In LlamasC.MullanyL.StockwellP. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to sociolinguistics (pp. 95–100). London, England: Routledge.
7.
BrownC.SnodgrassT.KemperS. J.HermanR.CovingtonM. (2008). Automatic measurement of propositional idea density from part-of-speech tagging. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 540–545.
8.
CampenniC. (1999). Gender stereotyping of children’s toys: A comparison of parents and nonparents. Sex Roles, 40, 121–138.
9.
ClarkH.MurphyG. (1982). Audience design in meaning and reference. In NyJ.F. LeKinstschW. (Ed.), Language and comprehension (pp. 287–299). New York, NY: North-Holland.
10.
ConnorL.SpiroA.OblerL.AlbertM. (2004). Change in object naming ability during adulthood. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 59, 203–209.
11.
FratiglioniL.Hui-XinW.EricssonK.MaytanM.WinbladB. (2000). Influence of social network on occurrence of dementia: a community-based longitudinal study. The Lancet, 355, 1315–1319.
12.
FratiglioniL.Paillard-BorgS.WinbladB. (2004). An active and socially integrated lifestyle in late life might protect against dementia. The Lancet, 3, 343–353.
13.
GassS. M.VaronisE. (1985). Variation in native speaker speech modification to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 37–58.
14.
GilesH.OgayT. (2009). Communication accommodation theory. In WhaleyB. B.SamterW. (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 325–344). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discover of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine.
16.
HamiltonH. (1994). Conversations with an Alzheimer's patient. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge.
17.
HattieJ.TimperleyH. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
18.
HawkinsK.BenderS. (2002). Norms and the relationship of Boston Naming Test performance to vocabulary and education: A review. Aphasiology, 16, 1143–1153.
19.
HoltzmanR.RebokG.SaczynskiJ.KouzisA.DoyleK.EatonW. (2004). Social network characteristics and cognition in middle-aged and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological and Social Sciences, 59(6), P278–P284.
20.
HopperR. (1992). Telephone conversation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
21.
HortonW. S.GerrigR. J. (2002). Speakers' experiences and audience design: knowing when and knowing how to adjust utterances to addressees. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 589–606.
22.
HortonW. S.SpielerD. (2007). Age-related differences in communication and audience design. Psychology and Aging, 22, 281–290.
23.
HummertM. L. (1994). Stereotypes of the elderly and patronizing speech. In HummertM. L.WiemannJ. M.NussbaumJ. F. (Eds.), Interpersonal communication in older adulthood: Interdisciplinary theory and research (pp. 163–184). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
HupetM.ChantraineY.NefF. (1993). References in conversation between young and old normal adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 339–346.
25.
HutchbyI. (1995). Aspects of recipient design in expert advice-giving on call-in radio. Discourse Processes, 19, 219–238.
26.
Keller-CohenD.FioriK.TolerA.BybeeD. (2006). Social relations, language and cognition in the ‘oldest old'. Ageing and Society, 26, 585–605.
27.
KemperS.ThompsonS.MarquisJ. (2001). Longitudinal change in language production: Effects of aging and dementia on grammatical complexity and propositional content. Psychology and Aging, 16, 600–614.
28.
KintschW. (1974). The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
LabovW.WaletskyJ. (1997). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 3–38.
30.
LevinsonS. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
31.
LitwinH. (1995). The social networks of elderly immigrants: An analytic typology. Journal of Aging Studies, 9, 155–174.
32.
MillerG.GalanterE.PribramK. (1986). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York, NY: Adams Bannister Cox.
33.
NeilsJ.BarisJ. M.CarterC.Dell'airaA. L.NordlohS.WeilerE.WeisigerB. (1995). Effects of age, education, and living environment on Boston Naming Test performance. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 38, 1143–1149.
34.
OdatoC.Keller-CohenD. (2009). Evaluating the speech of younger and older adults: Age, gender and speech situation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 457–475.
35.
Pushkar GoldD.ArbuckleT. (1995). A longitudinal study of off-target verbosity. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 50, P307–P315.
36.
RusherJ. B.HurleyM. M. (2000). Off-target verbosity evokes negative stereotypes of older adults. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 19, 141–149.
37.
SeemanT.LusignoloT.AlbertM.BerkmanL. (2001). Social relationships, social support and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high-functioning older adults: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Health Psychology, 20(4), 243–255.
38.
ShatzM.GelmanR. (1973). The development of communication skills: Modifications in the speech of young children as a function of listener. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 38, 1–38.
39.
SidnellJ. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
40.
SmallB.DixonR.McArdleJ.GrimmK. (2012). Do changes in lifestyle engagement moderate cognitive decline in normal aging? Evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study. Neuropsychology, 26, 144–155.
41.
TemplinM. C. (1957). Certain language skills in children: Their development and interrelationships. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
42.
TurnerA.GreeneE. (1977). The construction and use of a propositional text base. Boulder: Institute for the Study of Intellectual Behavior, University of Colorado.
43.
WengerG. C. (1997). Social networks and the prediction of elderly at risk. Ageing and Mental Health, 1, 311–320.
44.
ZunzuneguiM. C.AlvaradoB.Del SerT.OteroA. (2003). Social networks, social integration and social engagement determine cognitive decline in community-dwelling Spanish older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58B(2), S93–S100.
