ADAMS, S.
(1976) “Structure and dynamics of behavior in organization boundary roles,” in M. Dunnette (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
2.
ALKIN, M.
, R. DAILLAK, and P. WHITE (1979) Using Evaluations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
ALKIN, M.
, M. KOSECOFF, C. FITZGIBBON, and R. SELIGMAN (1974) Evaluating and Decision-Making: The Title VII Experience. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, UCLA.
4.
BERGER, P.
and T. LUCKMAN (1966) The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.
5.
BEYER, J.
and H. TRICE (1982) “The utilization process: a conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings.”Admin. Sci. Q.27 (December): 591-622.
6.
BIGELOW, D.
and J. CIARLO (1976) “The impact of therapeutic effectiveness data on community mental health center management,” in G. Glass (Ed.) Evaluation Studies Evaluation Annual, Vol. 1. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
CAPLAN, N.
(1977) “A minimal set of conditions from the utilization of social science knowledge on policy for formulation at the national level,” in C. Weiss (ed.) Using Social Research in Public Policy-Making. Lexington, MA: Heath.
8.
CIMPONERIU, R.
(1984) “Types d' utilisation de la recherche educationnelle: une analyse de la litterature en langue française.”Education et Recherche6, 1: 107-127.
9.
COCHRAN, N.
(1978) “Cognitions, social mores and the accumulation of data”Evaluation Q.2: 343-358.
10.
CROZIER, M.
and E. FRIEDBERG (1977) l'Acteur et le Systeme. Paris: Ed. du Seuil.
11.
DESHPANDE, R.
and M. ZALTMAN (1983) “Patterns of research use in private and public sectors.”Knowledge4, 4: 561-575.
12.
DeYOUNG, D.
and R. CONNER (1982) “Evaluator preconceptions about organizational decision making.”Evaluation Rev.3, 3: 431-440.
13.
DIMAGGIO, P.
and M. UNSEEM (1979) “Decentralized applied research: factors affecting the use of audience research by arts organizations.”J. of Applied Behavioral Sci.15, 1: 79-94.
14.
DUNCAN, J.
(1980) “Knowledge transfer in administrative science.”Public Admin. Rev.40, 3: 341-349.
15.
DUNN, W.
(1980) “The two communities metaphor and models of knowledge use.”Knowledge1, 4: 515-536.
16.
DUNN, W.
, B. HOLZNER, and G. ZALTMAN (1985) “Knowledge utilization,” in T. Husen and N. Postlethwaite (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Education, Vol. 5. London: Pergamon.
17.
ELMORE, R.
(1978) “Organizational models of social program implementation.”Public Policy26, 2: 184-225.
18.
FELDMAN, M.
and J. MARCH (1981) “Information in organizations as signal and symbol.”Admin. Sci. Q.26, 2: 171-186.
19.
GLASER, B.
(1978) Theoretical Sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
20.
GLASER, E.et al.
(1976) Putting Knowledge to Use: A Distillation of the Literature Regarding Knowledge Transfer and Change. Los Angeles: HIRI.
21.
GLASER, E.
, H. ABELSON, and K. GARRISON (1983) Putting Knowledge to Use: Facilitating the Diffusion of Knowledge and the Implementation of Planned Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
GLASSMAN, R.
(1973) “Persistence and loose coupling in living systems.”Behavioral Sci.18, 1: 83-98.
23.
GRANOVETTER, M.
(1973) “The strength of weak ties.”Amer. J. of Sociology78: 1360-1380.
24.
HABERMAS, J.
(1973) Theory and Practice. Boston: Beacon.
25.
HAVELOCK, R.
(1969) Planning for Innovation through Dissemination and Utilization of Knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: CRUSK.
26.
HAWKINS, J.
, R. ROFFMAN, and P. OSBORNE (1978) “Decision-makers' judgements: the influence of role, evaluative criteria and information access.”Evaluation Q.2: 435-454.
27.
HUBERMAN, M.
(1982) “L'utilisation de la recherche educationnelle: vers un mode d'empoli.”Education et Recherche, 4, 2: 136-153.
28.
HUBERMAN, M.
(1985) “La diffusion des connaissances scientifiques dans les programmes nationaux de recherche: quelques propos extravagants.”Education et Vie Active3, 3: 71-91.
29.
HUSEN, T.
and M. KOGAN [eds.] (1984) Educational Research and Policy. How Do They Relate?Oxford: Pergamon.
30.
JOHNSON, K.
, W. FRAZIER, and M. RIDDICK (1983) “A change strategy for linking the worlds of academic and practice.”J. of Applied Behavioral Sci.19, 4: 439-460.
31.
KNORR, K.
(1977) “Policy makers' use of social science knowledge: symbolic or instrumental?” in C. Weiss (ed.) Using Social Research in Public Policy-Making. Lexington, MA: Heath.
32.
LEVITON, L.
and R. BORUCH (1983) “Contribution of evaluation to education programs and policy.”Evaluation Rev.7, 5: 563-598.
33.
LIKERT, R.
and R. LIPPETT (1953) “The utilization of social science,” in L. Festinger and D. Katz (eds.) Research Methods in the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Holt, Rinehart.
34.
LINDBLOM, C.
(1959) “The science of muddling through.”Public Admin. Rev.19: 79-88.
35.
MAIDIQUE, M.
and B. ZIRGER (1984) “A study of success and failure in product innovation: the case of the U.S. electronics industry.”IEEE Transactions (November): 192-203.
36.
MARCH, J.
and J. OLSEN (1976) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.
37.
MEYER, J.
and B. ROWAN (1977) “Institutionalized organizations: formal structures as myths and ceremonies.”Amer. J. of Sociology83: 340-363.
38.
MILES, M.
and M. HUBERMAN (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
39.
MILLER, J.
and P. ROWE (1967) “Influence of favorable and unfavorable information upon assessment decisions.”J. of Applied Psychology51: 432-435.
40.
MUTHARD, J.
and K. FELICE (1982) “Assessing activities for utilization of rehabilitation research.”Knowledge4, 2: 309-328.
41.
NISBETT, R.
and L. ROSS (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
42.
O'REILLY, C.
(1981) “Constraints on evaluation utilization,” in A. Bank and R. Williams (eds.) Evaluation in School Districts: Organizational Perspectives. Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, UCLA.
43.
PELZ, D.
(1978) “Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public policy,” in M. Yinger and S. Cutler (eds.) Major Social Issues: A Multidisciplinary View. New York: Free Press.
44.
REIN, M.
and S. MILLER (1966) “Social action on the installment plan.”Transaction3, 1: 21-28.
45.
RICH, R.
(1977) “Use of social science information by federal bureaucrats: knowledge for action vs. knowledge for understanding,” in C. Weiss (ed.) Using Social Research in Public Policy-Making. Lexington, MA: Heath.
46.
RICH, R.
(1981) Social Science Information and Public Policy-Making. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
ROGERS, E.
(1961) Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
48.
ROGERS, E.
and F. SHOEMAKER (1971) The Communication of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
49.
ROSSI, P.
, J. WRIGHT, and S. WRIGHT (1978) “The theory and practice of applied social research.”Evaluation J.2: 171-191.
50.
ROTHMAN, J.
(1980) Using Research in Organizations. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage.
51.
SABATIER, P.
(1984) “Faculty interest in policy-oriented advising and research.”Knowledge5, 4: 469-502.
52.
SCHELLING, T.
(1963) The Strategy of Conflict. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
53.
SHAPIRO, J.
(1984) “Conceptualizing evaluation use,” in R. Conneret al. (eds.) Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Vol. 9. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
54.
STAW, B.
and J. ROSS (1978) “Commitment to a policy decision: a multi-theoretical perspective.”Admin. Sci. Q.23, 1: 40-64.
55.
Van de VALL, M.
and C. BOLAS (1981) “A paradigm of social policy research in advanced systems: an empirical analysis.”Int. Rev. of Sociology17: 93-111.
56.
WEICK, K.
(1974) “Middle-range theories of social systems.”Behavioral Sci.19, 3: 357-367.
57.
WEICK, K.
(1979) The Social Psychology of Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
58.
WEISS, C.
[ed.] (1977) Using Social Research in Public Policy-Making. Lexington, MA: Heath.
59.
WEISS, C.
(1980) Knowledge creep and decision accretion. Knowledge, 1, 3, 381-404.
60.
WEISS, C.
(1981) “Use of social science research in organizations: the constrained repertoire theory,” in H. Stein (ed.) Organization and the Human Services. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press.
61.
WEISS, C.
(1983) “Toward the future of stakeholder approaches in evaluation,” in Stakeholder-Based Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
62.
WHITEMAN, D.
(1985) “Reaffirming the importance of strategic use.”Knowledge6, 3: 203-224.
63.
YIN, R.
(1984) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
64.
YIN, R.
and G. MOORE (1985) The Utilization of Research: Lessons from the Natural Hazards Field. Washington, DC: Cosmos Corp.
65.
YOUNG, M.
[ed.] (1975) Knowledge and Control. London: Macmillan.
