AXELROD, R.
(1976) The Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
2.
BECKER, H. S.
(1979) “Do photographs tell the truth?” pp. 99-117 in T. D. Cook and C. S. Reichardt (eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
BOGDAN, R.
and S. TAYLOR (1975) Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. York: John Wiley.
4.
BOUGON, M.
, K. WEICK, and D. BINKHORST (1977) “Cognition in Organizations: an analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra.”Admin. Sci. Q.22: 606-639.
5.
BROWN, S. R.
(1980) Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q-Methodology to Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
6.
CAMPBELL, D. T.
(1979) “ `Degrees of freedom' and the case study,” pp. 49-67 in T. D. Cook and C. S. Reichardt (eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
CAMPBELL, D. T.
(1974a) “Evolutionary epistemology,” pp. 413-463 in P. A. Schilpp (ed.) The Philosophy of Karl Popper. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Press.
8.
CAMPBELL, D. T.
(1974b) “Qualitative knowing in action research.”Kurt Lewin Award Address, Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, American Psychological Association, New Orleans, September 1.
9.
CAMPBELL, D. T.
(1970) “Considering the case against experimental evaluations of social innovations.”Admin. Sci. Q.15: 110-113.
10.
CAPLAN, N.
, A. MORRISON, and R. J. STAMBAUGH (1975) The Use of Social Science Knowledge in Policy Decisions at the National Level: A Report to Respondents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research and the Center for Utiliza-tion of Scientific Knowledge.
11.
CICOUREL, A.et al.
(1974) Language Use and School Performance. New York: Academic.
12.
COCHRAN, N.
, A. GORDON, and M. KRAUSE (1980) “Proactive records: reflections on the village watchman.”Knowledge2, 1: 5-18.
13.
COOK, T. D.
and D. T. CAMPBELL (1979) Quasi-Experimentation. Chicago: Rand McNally.
14.
COOK, T. D.
and C. S. REICHARDT [eds.] (1979) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
COULTHARD, M.
(1977) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
16.
DALLMAYR, F. R.
and T. A. McCARTHY [eds.] (1977) Understanding and Social In-quiry. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
17.
DENZIN, N. K.
(1970) The Research Act. Chicago: Aldine.
18.
DONNER, W.
(1980) Research Into Use: The Social Contexts of Knowledge Transfer. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, Inc.
19.
DUNN, W. N.
(1983) “Social Network Theory.”Knowledge4, 3: 453-461.
20.
DUNN, W. N.
(1980) “The two communities metaphor and models of knowledge use: an explora-tory case survey.”Knowledge1, 4: 515-536.
21.
DUNN, W. N.
and A. GINSBERG (1983) A Sociocognitive Approach to Organizational Culture. Working Paper KU-21. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Program for the Study of Knowledge Use.
22.
DUNN, W. N.
and B. HOLZNER (1981) Methodological Research on Knowledge Use and School Improvement, vol. 1: Project Overview and Summary of Findings. Final Report prepared for the National Institute of Education (grant NIE-G-81-0019). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Program for the Study of Knowledge Use.
23.
FILSTEAD, W. J.
(1979) “Qualitative methods: a needed perspective in evaluation research,” pp. 33-48 in T. D. Cook and C. S. Reichardt (eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
FIRESTONE, W.et al.
(1982) Knowledge Use and Local School Improvement. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, Inc.
25.
FRANSELLA, F.
and D. BANNISTER (1977) A Manual for Reportory Grid Technique. London: Academic.
26.
FROST, W. A.
and R. L. BRAINE (1967) “The application of the repertory grid to problems in marketing research.”Commentary9, 3: 161-175.
27.
GLASER, B. G.
and A. L. STRAUSS (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
28.
GREGG, G.
, T. PRESTON, A. GEIST and N. CAPLAN (1979) “The caravan rolls on: forty years of social problem research.”Knowledge1, 1: 31-61.
29.
GUBA, E.
(1981) “Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries.”Educ. Communication and Technology J.
30.
HOLZNER, B.
and J. MARX (1979) Knowledge Application: The Knowledge System in Society. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
HUBERMAN, M. J.
and M. B. MILES (forthcoming) “Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: some techniques of data reduction and display.” Quality and Quantity. KELLY, G. A. (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.
32.
KNORR-CETINA, K. D.
(1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon.
33.
LATOUR, B.
and S. WOOLGAR (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
LAZARSFIELD, P.
and J. REITZ (1975) An Introduction to Applied Sociology. New York: Elsevier.
35.
LINDBLOM C.
and D. COHEN (1979) Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
36.
MACHLUP, F.
(1980) Knowledge and Knowledge Production, vol. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
MACHLUP, F.
(1962) The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
38.
McINTYRE, T. R.
and E. FISHER (1981) Qualitative Procedures for Research On Knowledge Use and School Improvement. Working Paper KU-06. Pittsburgh: Program for the Study of Knowledge Use.
39.
MILES, M. B.
(1979) “Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance.”Admin. Sci. Q.24 (December): 590-601.
40.
MITROFF, I. I.
(1974) “Norms and counter-norms in a select group of Apollo moon scientists: a case study of the ambivalence of scientists.”Amer. Soc. Rev.38 (June): 579-595.
41.
MITROFF, I. I.
and R. O. MASON (1981) Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions. New York: John Wiley.
42.
PATTON, M. Q.
(1978) Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
43.
REICHARDT, C. S.
and T. D. COOK (1979) “Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods,” pp. 7-32 in T. D. Cook and C. S. Reichardt (eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44.
RESCHER, N.
(1980) Induction. Pittsburgh: Univ. of Pittsburgh Press.
45.
SLATER, P.
(1977) Dimensions of Intrapersonal Space. London: John Wiley.
46.
SPRADLEY, J.
(1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
47.
STEPHENSON, W.
(1979) “Q-methodology and Newton's fifth rule.”Amer. Psychologist, 34: 354-357.
48.
WACKER, G. I.
(1981) “Toward a cognitive methodology of organizational assessment.”J. of Applied Behavioral Sci.17: 114-129.
49.
WOLCOTT, H.
(1975) “Criteria for an ethnographic approach to research in schools.”Human Organization34: 111-127.
50.
YIN, R. K.
(1981a) “The case study crisis: some answers.”Admin. Sci. Q.26 (March): 58-66.
51.
YIN, R. K.
(1981b) “The case study as a serious research strategy.”Knowledge3, 1: 97-114.
