Far-right movements tend to have an ambivalent relationship with mainstream media. On the one hand, they often express animosity towards traditional media, accusing them of spreading ‘fake news’ and being part of a hostile conspiracy against ordinary (white) people. On the other hand, this often antagonist perception of the media does not stop far-right actors from using mainstream reporting for their ideological online messaging. This contradictory relationship is situated in a broader societal context shaped by, among other factors, widespread mistrust towards the media, an increasingly polarised media landscape and the recent proliferation of a hyper-partisan online media ecosystem at the far-right fringes. Against this contextual backdrop, this multimethod study analyses over 45,000 posts from Australian users of the far-right alt-tech online platform Gab to examine the use of mainstream media sources for their ideological messaging. This is complemented by a qualitative in-depth analysis of 298 posts that share mainstream media content, identifying posting patterns of incorporating or reframing mainstream media outputs that seek to communicate far-right ideologies within the ideologically charged online community on Gab.
AdairB (2019) Bias is good. It just needs a label. Columbia Journalism Review, 29August.
2.
AlejandroJ (2010) Journalism in the age of social media. Report, University of Oxford, UK.
3.
BaugutPNeumannK (2019) How right-wing extremists use and perceive news media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly96(3): 696–720.
4.
BenklerYFarisRRobertsH, et al. (2017) Breitbart-led right-wing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda. Columbia Journalism Review, 3March.
5.
BenklerYFarisRRobertsH (2018) Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
BlackbournJMcGarrityNRoachK (2020) Understanding and responding to right wing terrorism. Journal of Policing Intelligence and Counter Terrorism14(3): 183–190.
7.
CarterE (2018) Right-wing extremism/radicalism: Reconstructing the concept. Journal of Political Ideologies23(2): 157–182.
8.
CinelliMDe Francisci MoralesGGaleazziA, et al. (2021) The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America118(9): 1–8.
FawziN (2019) Untrustworthy news and the media as “enemy of the people?” How a populist worldview shapes recipients’ attitudes toward the media. The International Journal of Press/Politics24(2): 146–164.
11.
FigenschouTUIhlebækKA (2019) Challenging Journalistic Authority Media criticism in far-right alternative media. Journalism Studies20(9): 1221–1237.
12.
FreelonDMarwickAKreissD (2020) False equivalencies: Online activism from left to right. Science369(6508): 1197–1201.
13.
GrahamTBrunsAAngusD, et al. (2021) #istandwithDan versus #DictatorDan: The polarised dynamics of Twitter discussions about Victoria’s COVID-19 restrictions. Media International Australia179(1): 127–148.
14.
GuerinCPeuckerMFisherTJ, et al. (2021) A Snapshot of Far-Right Activity on Gab in Australia. Melbourne: Centre for Resilient and Inclusive Societies.
15.
HallerAHoltK (2019) Paradoxical populism: How PEGIDA relates to mainstream and alternative media. Information Communication & Society22(12): 1665–1680.
16.
HeftAMayerhöfferEReinhardtS, et al. (2020) Beyond Breitbart: Comparing right-wing digital news infrastructures in six Western democracies. Policy & Internet12(1): 20–45.
17.
KaiserJRauchfleischABourassaN (2020) Connecting the (far-)right dots: A topic modeling and hyperlink analysis of (far-)right media coverage during the US Elections 2016. Digital Journalism8(3): 422–441.
18.
Knight Foundation (2018) Indicators of news media trust. Report, Gallup.
19.
KubinEvon SikorskiC (2021) The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association45(3): 188–206.
20.
LeeB (2015) A Day in the “Swamp”: Understanding Discourse in the online counter-jihad Nebula. Democracy and Security11(3): 248–274.
21.
LernerKM (2020) Journalists believe news and opinion are separate, but readers can’t tell the difference. The Conversation, 22June.
22.
LevyGRazinR (2020) Social media and political polarisation. LSE Public Policy Review1(1): 1–5.
23.
LewisR (2018) Alternative influence: Broadcasting the reactionary right on YouTube. Report, Data & Society.
24.
LewisSC (2020) Lack of trust in the news media, institutional weakness, and relational journalism as a potential way forward. Journalism21(3): 345–348.
25.
LimaLReisJCSMeloP, et al. (2018) Inside the Right-Leaning Echo Chambers: Characterizing Gab, an Unmoderated Social System. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining, pp.515–522. New York, NY: IEEE.
26.
MinkenbergM (2017) The rise of the radical right in Eastern Europe: Between mainstreaming and radicalization. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs18(1): 27–35.
27.
MuddeC (2000) The Ideology of the Extreme Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
MuddeC (2019) The Far Right Today. Cambridge: Polity.
29.
MunnL (2021) More than a mob: Parler as preparatory media for the U.S. capitol storming. First Monday Epub ahead of print 7 February 2021. DOI: 10.5210/fm.v26i3.11574.
30.
ParkSFisherCMcGuinnessK, et al. (2021) Digital News Report: Australia 2021. Canberra: University of Canberra.
31.
PeuckerMSmithDIqbalM (2018) Mapping Network and Narratives of Far-Right Movements in Victoria. Report. Melbourne: Victoria University.
32.
PeuckerMSmithDIqbalM (2019) Not a monolithic movement: The diverse and shifting messaging of Australia’s far-right. In: PeuckerMSmithD (eds) The Far-Right in Contemporary Australia. Singapore: Palgrave, pp.73–100.
33.
RichardsIRaeMVerganiM, et al. (2021) Political philosophy and Australian far-right media: A critical discourse analysis of the unshackled and XYZ. Thesis Eleven163(1): 103–130.
34.
SimmonsCFarrell-MolloyJDaveyJ, et al. (2021) Reciprocal Dynamics Between Australia’s Political Fringes on Twitter. Report. Melbourne: Centre for Resilient and Inclusive Societies.
35.
StrömbäckJTsfatiYBoomgaardenH, et al. (2020) News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association44(2): 139–156.
36.
van der LindenSPanagopoulosCRoozenbeekJ (2020) You are fake news: Political bias in perceptions of fake news. Media Culture & Society42(3): 460–470.
37.
WeberDNasimMFalzonL, et al. (2020) #ArsonEmergency and Australia’s “Black Summer”: Polarisation and misinformation on social media. In: van DuijnMPreussMSpaiserV, et al. (eds) Disinformation in Open Online Media. Cham: Springer, pp.159–173.
38.
Whitten-WoodringJJamesP (2012) Fourth Estate or mouthpiece? A formal model of media, protest, and government repression. Political Communication29(2): 113–136.
