Rebel with a cause: the framing of climate change and intergenerational justice in the German press treatment of the Fridays for Future protests

Abstract

This study investigates the representation of the Fridays for Future strikes in the German online newspapers Bild.de, Zeit Online and FAZ.net. Through a qualitative and quantitative content analysis over the time period August 2018 to March 2019, eight frames have been identified. Whereas Zeit Online shows a framing towards intergenerational justice, the coverage of FAZ.net and Bild.de strongly adheres to the protest paradigm. The majority of all articles guarantees protesters a voice, but this voice is often reduced to apolitical testimonies and the protesters’ self-agency is undermined through disparagement. German media coverage thus tends to reproduce existing power structures by marginalizing and depoliticizing the political agenda of a system critical protest. Although this framing feeds into the shift of the climate change discourse towards adaptation, the study shows that the idea of climate change as an issue of intergenerational justice and children’s rights has become part of the media’s agenda.

Keywords

climate change framing theory Fridays for Future German press intergenerational justice social protest

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altheide

(2000) Tracking discourse and qualitative content analysis. Poetics 27(1): 287–299.

Arnold

(2018) Doom and gloom: the role of the media in public disengagement on climate change. Available at: https://shorensteincenter.org/media-disengagement-climate-change/ (accessed 17 June 2020).

Bergmann

Ossewaarde

(2020) Youth climate activists meet environmental governance: ageist depictions of the FFF movement and Greta Thunberg in German newspaper coverage. Journal of Multicultural Discourses. Epub ahead of print 2 April 2020. DOI: 10.1080/17447143.2020.1745211.

Berry

(1971) The Unforeseen Wilderness: An Essay on Kentucky’s Red River Gorge. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.

Bird

Rahfaldt

(2011) Children and the media: voices worth hearing? In: Jameison

Bray

Viziers

, et al (eds) South African Child Gauge. Cape Town: Children’s Institute, University of Capetown, pp. 54–58.

Boykoff

(2011) Who Speaks for the Climate? Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Boykoff

(2014) Media discourse on the climate slow down. Nature Climate Change 4(3): 156–158.

Brown Weiss

(1992) In fairness to future generations and sustainable development. American University International Law Review 8(1): 19–26.

Cannon

(2019) Climate strikes: Greta Thunberg calls for ‘system change not climate change’ – here’s what that could look like. The Conversation.com, 15 March, 2019. Available at: https://theconversation.com/climate-strikes-greta-thunberg-calls-for-system-change-not-climate-change-heres-what-that-could-look-like-112891 (accessed 29 October 2019).

10.

Curran

(1982) Communication, power and social order. In: Gurevitch

Bennett

Curran

, et al (eds) Culture, Society and the Media. New York: Routlegde, pp. 202–235.

11.

Curry

Hodgons

(2008) Seeing in multiple horizons: connecting futures to strategy. Journal of Futures Studies 13(1): 1–20.

12.

Cynk

(2018) The process of climate change in mass media discourse using the example of Polish and international editions of ‘Newsweek’ magazine. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 25(31): 439–449.

13.

Davidson

(2017) Intergenerational commitments are critical to protecting future climate leaders. Open Global rights.org. Available at: https://www.openglobalrights.org/intergenerational-commitments-are-critical-to%20protecting-future-climate-leaders/ (accessed 5 June 2019).

14.

Entman

(1993) Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.

15.

Eurotopics (2019) Deutschland. Available at: https://www.eurotopics.net/de/142186/medien?search=&country=146386&language=147631&art=7&circulation=0&typ=2#results (accessed 5 June 2019).

16.

FAZ (2018) In eigener Sache. FAZ.net. Available at: https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/digitale-reichweite-der-faz-stark-gestiegen-15699377.html (accessed 5 June 2019).

17.

Gossieres

Meyer

(2009) Intergenerational Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

18.

Guillemot

Burgess

(2019) Child rights at risk. Available at: https://www.unicef-irc.org/article/928-child-rights-at-risk-the-case-for-joint-action-with-climate-change.html (accessed 12 June 2019).

19.

Hasebrink

(2016) Meinungsbildung und Kontrolle der Medien. Bpb.de, 9 December. Available at: http://www.bpb.de/gesellschaft/medien-und-sport/medienpolitik/172240/meinungsbildung-und-kontrolle-der-medien (accessed 29 October 2019).

20.

Høeg

(2017) Sinking strangers. Master Thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain.

21.

IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Edenhofer

Pichs-Madruga

Sokona

, et al. (eds). New York: Cambridge University Press.

22.

Høeg

Tulloch

(2018) Sinking strangers: media representation of climate refugees on the BBC and Al Jazeera. Journal of Communication Inquiry 43(3): 225–248.

23.

IPCC (2018) Summary for policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte

Zhai

Pörtner

, et al. (eds) Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization, p. 32.

24.

Iyengar

(1991) American Politics and Political Economy Series. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

25.

Kettrey

(2018) Activism without activists-News media coverage of youth as illegitimate political agents in the virginity-pledge movement and gay-straight alliances. Mobilization - An International Quarterly 23(3): 359–364.

26.

Kramcsak-Muñoz

(2019) El discurso ambientalista tradicional ya no sirve. Elperiodico.com, 21 March. Available at: https://www.elperiodico.com/es/medio-ambiente/20190321/entrevista-medio-ambiente-xuksa-kramcsak-munoz-7366124 (accessed 29 October 2019).

27.

Kuckartz

(2016) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Weinheim: Beltz-Juventa.

28.

Kühne

(2013) Emotionale Framing Effekte auf Einstellungen: Ein integratives Modell. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 61(1): 5–20.

29.

Kunreuther

(2015) Short-Term thinking without long-term focus could hamper climate talks. Brink News, 3 December. Available at: http://www.brinknews.com/short-term-thinking-without-long-term-focus-could-hamper-climate-talks/ (accessed 29 October 2019).

30.

Lee

FLF

(2014) Triggering the protest paradigm: examining factors affecting news coverage of protests. International Journal of Communication 8(27): 25–46.

31.

McCombs

Shaw

(1972) The agenda-setting function of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176–187.

32.

McCurdy

(2012) Social movements, protest and Mainstream Media. Sociology Compass 6(3): 244–255.

33.

McLeod

(2007) News coverage and social protest: how the Media’s protect paradigm exacerbates social conflict. Journal of Dispute Resolution 1(12): 185–194.

34.

McLeod

Hertog

(1999) Social change and the Mass Media’s role in the regulation of protest groups. In: Demers

Ames

(eds) Mass Media, Social Control and Social Change: A Macrosocial Perspective. Iowa: Iowa State University Press, pp. 305–3017.

35.

McNamara

Gibson

(2009) We do not want to leave our land: Pacific ambassadors at the United Nations resist the category of ‘climate refugees’. Geoforum 40(3): 475–483.

36.

Merkley

Stecula

(2019) Framing climate change: economics, ideology, and uncertainty in American News Media content from 1988 to 2014. Frontiers in Communication 4(6): 1–15.

37.

Methmann

(2014) Visualizing climate-refugees: race, vulnerability, and resilience in global liberal politics. International Political Sociology 8(4): 416–435.

38.

Methmann

Oels

(2015) From ‘fearing’ to ‘empowering’ climate refugees: governing climate-induced migration in the name of resilience. Security Dialogue 46(1): 51–68.

39.

Mintzer

Michel

(2001) Climate change, rights of future generations and intergenerational equity: an in-expert exploration of a dark and cloudy path. International Journal Global Environmental Issues 1(2): 203–222.

40.

Nachmany

Mangan

(2018) Aligning national and international climate targets. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science. Available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publications (accessed 20 June 2020).

41.

Nehrlich

Forsyth

Clarke

(2011) Climate in the news: how differences in media discourse between the US and UK reflect national priorities. Environmental Communication 6(1): 44–63.

42.

New York Times Company (2005) More information about opinion articles. The New York Times, 9 December. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/29/opinion/more-information-about-opinion-articles.html (accessed 29 October 2019).

43.

O’Brien

Selboe

Hayward

(2018) Exploring youth activism on climate change: dutiful, disruptive, and dangerous dissent. Ecology and Society 23(3): 42.

44.

Oels

(2015) Security. In: Bäckstrand

Lövbrand

(eds) Research Handbook on Climate Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, pp. 458–469.

45.

Orzessek

(2018) Das Sommerloch: Über Nutzen und Nachteil eines schwindenden Begriffs. Deutschlandfunk.de, 11 July. Available at: https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/das-sommerloch-ueber-nutzen-und-nachteil-eines-schwindenden.2907.de.html?dram:article_id=422646 (accessed 29 October 2019).

46.

Painter

(2013) Climate Change in the Media: Reporting Risk and Uncertainty. New York, NY: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.

47.

Post

Kleine-von Königslöw

Schäfer

(2019) Between guilt and obligation: debating the responsibility for climate change and climate politics in the Media. Environmental Communication. Epub ahead of print 1 May 2018. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2018.1446037.

48.

Rivera

(2019) Why do newspapers still have editorials? USA Today, 2 February. Available at: https://eu.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/02/05/why-do-newspapers-still-have-editorials/1063917001/ (accessed 29 October 2019).

49.

Rogers

(2018) The difference between broadsheet and tabloid newspapers. Thougth.co. Available at: https://www.thoughtco.com/broadsheet-and-tabloid-newspapers-2074248 (accessed 29 October 2019).

50.

Santarius

(2007) Klimawandel und globale Gerechtigkeit. Bpb.de, 31 May. Available at: http://www.bpb.de/apuz/30435/klimawandel-und-globale-gerechtigkeit?p=all (accessed 29 October 2019).

51.

Schenk

(2007) Medienwirkungsforschung (3. Aufl.). Tü̈bingen: Mohr Siebeck.

52.

Scheufele

(2003) Frames-Framing-Framing Effekte: Theoretische und methodische Grundlegung des Framing-Ansatzes sowie empirische Befunde zur Nachrichtenproduktion. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

53.

Schmidt

Schäfer

(2015) Constructions of climate justice in German, Indian and US media. Climatic Change 133(3): 535–549.

54.

Schmid-Petri

Arlt

(2016) Constructing an illusion of scientific uncertainty? Framing climate change in German and British print media. Communications 41(3): 265–289.

55.

Smith

McCarthy

McPhail

, et al. (2001) From protest to agenda building: description bias in media coverage of protest events in Washington, D.C. Social Forces 79(4): 1397–1429.

56.

Springer (2012) AGOF mobile facts 2012. Available at: https://www.axelspringer.com/de/presseinformationen/agof-mobile-facts-2011-die-erfolgreichsten-journalistischen-mobilangebote-kommen-von-axel-springer (accessed 12 June 2019).

57.

Sterman

(2013) Adaptation or mitigation? Lessons from abolition in the battle over climate policy. Think progress, 5 July 2013. Available at: https://thinkprogress.org/adaptation-or-mitigation-lessons-from-abolition-in-the-battle-over-climate-policy-7f81d4b7e353/ (accessed 29 October 2019).

58.

Tagesschau (2019) Klima Demos von Berlin bis Sydney. Tagesschau.de, 15 March. Available at: https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/klimaschutz-demonstrationen-fridays-for-future-103.html (accessed 29 October 2019).

59.

Thunberg

(2019) Our house is on fire. Fridays for Future.org. Available at: https://www.fridaysforfuture.org/greta-speeches#greta_speech_jan25_2019 (accessed 12 June 2019).

60.

UNICEF

(2010) A brighter tomorrow: climate change, child rights and intergenerational justice. Report, Unicef, UK, September.

61.

Vlad

(2017) Perspectives on media representation of children. Social Sciences and Education Research Review 4(1): 114–124.