In recent years, Reliance Jio’s offer of 4G services, guaranteeing free voice calls and ‘unlimited’ data streaming, lead to disruption in the Indian telecom market with other cellular operators losing their revenue and customer base. To comprehensively analyze this churn in the Indian telecom industry and its impact on mobile phone customers, the article argues for observing the entanglement of infrastructural and platform-related discourses at three levels of operation: Jio’s strategies to capture the Indian telecom market and the responses by the leading incumbent service provider (Airtel), ordinary citizens’ phone use practices and infrastructural encounters, and the government’s vision for India’s digital future. Connecting pipes to platforms, Jio made infrastructural investments (in spectrum, cell towers, and fiber optics networks) to promote its suite of apps (JioTV, JioChat, and JioMoney). Ordinary citizens relate their access/proximity to telecom infrastructure (cell antennas) to their ability to effectively use apps on their phones. ‘Digital India’ vision purportedly facilitated infrastructural growth to create platforms that would support demonetization and facilitate transparent governance. Through such a three-pronged analysis, I conceptualize ‘infrastructural imaginaries’ that are coproduced by states and citizens, and lie at the intersection of structured state policy/corporate initiatives and lived experiences/affective encounters of ordinary citizens.
AgurC (2018) Re-imagining the Indian state: external forces and the transformation of telecommunications policy, 1947-present. Global Media and Communication14(1): 65–83.
3.
BarFBaerWGhandeharizadehSet al. (2008) Infrastructure: network neutrality and network futures. In: VarnelisK (ed.) Networked Publics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 109–143.
4.
BowkerGCStarSL (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5.
ChakravartyP (2004) Telecom, national development, and the Indian state: a postcolonial critique. Media, Culture & Society26(2): 227–249.
HelmondA (2015) The platformization of the web: making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society, 1(2): 1–11.
9.
HoltJVonderauP (2015) Where the internet lives’: data centers. In: ParksLStarosielskiN (eds) Signal Traffic: Critical Studies of Media Infrastructures. Urbana, IL; Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 71–93.
10.
JensenCB (2017) Pipe dreams: sewage infrastructure and activity trails in Phnom Penh. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology82(4): 627–647.
11.
KavooriAChadhaK (2008) The cellphone as a cultural technology: lessons from the Indian Case. In: KavooriAArceneauxN (eds) The Cell Phone Reader: Essays in Social Transformation. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 227–240.
ParksL (2015) ‘Stuff you can kick’: toward a theory of media infrastructures. In: GoldbergDTSvenssonP (eds) Between Humanities and the Digital. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 355–373.
22.
PlantinJCLagozeCEdwardsPet al. (2018) Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society20(1): 293–310.
VenkatramanSRangaswamyN (2016) Everyday life in Tamil Nadu, and its cost to ‘free basics. Proceedings of the 2016 Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference2016: 249–263.
