This study draws on Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology of culture in order to shed new light on the ongoing fragmentation of media audiences and users. We use a multiple correspondence analysis on national survey data (n = 1604) collected in Sweden in 2015–2016 to (1) create a statistical representation of the contemporary Swedish class structure and proceed to (2) analyze the distribution of a broad range of media practices and media preferences in that space. Results show that social groups reproduce their social status by monopolizing distinct media repertoires. We are able to show that class matters for how people orient themselves in an increasingly high-choice media environment – even in a so-called media welfare state. Following the results of our media-sociological approach, we introduce the concept of audience islands which promotes a non-media-centric understanding of the fragmentation of society and media audiences.
BennettLIyengarS (2008) A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication58: 707–731.
2.
BensonR (1998) Field theory in comparative context: a new paradigm for media studies. Theory and Society28: 462–498.
3.
BlomqvistP (2004) The choice revolution: privatization of Swedish welfare services in the 1990s. Social Policy Administration38(2): 139–155.
4.
BörjessonM (2015) Rummet Av Kulturvanor: En Fördjupad Analys Av 2014 Års Som-undersökning (The space of cultural consumption: an in-depth analysis of the 2014 SOM-survey). Stockholm: Myndigheten för kulturanalys.
5.
BörjessonMBroadyDLe RouxBet al. (2016) Cultural capital in the elite subfield of Swedish higher education. Poetics56: 15–34.
6.
BourdieuP (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. New York and London: Routledge.
7.
BourdieuP (1986) The forms of capital. In: RichardsonJG (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York and Greenwood, SC: Greenwood press, pp. 241–258.
8.
BourdieuP (1989) Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory7(1): 14–25.
9.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
BourdieuP (1993) The market of symbolic goods. In: BourdieuP (ed.) The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 112–141.
11.
BourdieuPWacquantL (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12.
BroadyD (1988) Kulturens fält – Om Pierre Bourdieus sociologi (The field of culture: on Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology). Nordicom-nytt 12(1–2): 59–88.
13.
ChaffeeSHMetzgerMJ (2001) The end of mass communication?Mass Communication and Society4(4): 365–379.
14.
ClarkeD (2014) Journalism and Political Exclusion: Social Conditions of News Production and Reception. Montreal, QC, Canada; Kingston, VIC, Australia; London; Ithaca, NY: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
15.
CoulangeonPDuvalJ (eds) (2015) The Routledge Companion to Bourdieu’s Distinction. London and New York: Routledge.
16.
DanielssonM (2014) Digitala Distinktioner: Klass Och Kontinuitet I Unga Mäns Vardagliga Mediepraktiker (Digital distinctions: class and continuity in young men’s everyday media practice). PhD Dissertation, Högskolan i Jönköping, Jönköping.
17.
De Saint MarinM (2015) From ‘anatomies to gout’ to La distinction: attempting to construct the social space: some markers for the history of research. In: CoulangeonPDuvalJ (eds) The Routledge Companion to Bourdieu’s Distinction. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 15–28.
18.
Delli CarpiniMXKeeterS (1996) What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
19.
ElvestadEBlekesauneA (2008) Newspaper readers in Europe: a multilevel study of individual and national differences. European Journal of Communication23(4): 425–447.
20.
EneloJ-M (2012) Klass, åsikt och partisympati: Det svenska konsumtionsfältet för politiska åsikter [Class, opinion and party preference: The Swedish field of consumption of political opinions]. PhD Dissertation. Örebro Studies in Sociology, Örebro.
21.
ErikssonG (2016) Humour, ridicule and the de-legitimization of the working class in Swedish reality television. Journal of Language and Politics15(3): 304–321.
22.
GarnhamN (1993) Bourdieu, the cultural arbitrary, and television. In: CalhounCJLiPumaEPostoneM (eds) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 178–192.
23.
GitlinT (1998) Public sphere or public sphericules? In LiebesTCurranJ (eds) Media, Ritual and Identity. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 168–174.
24.
GreenacreM (2007) Correspondence Analysis in Practice. Boca Raton, FL; London; New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC, Taylor & Francis.
25.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HasebrinkUDomeyerH (2012) Media repertoires as patterns of behavior and as meaningful practices: a multimethod approach to media use in converging media environments. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies9(2): 757–779.
27.
HelsperEJReisdorfBC (2016) The emergence of a ‘digital underclass’ in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society19: 1253–1270.
28.
HjellbrekkeJJarnessVKorsnesO (2015) Cultural distinctions in an ‘egalitarian’ society. In: CoulangeonPDuvalJ (eds) The Routledge Companion to Bourdieu’s Distinction. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 187–206.
29.
HovdenJFMoeH (2017) A sociocultural approach to public connection across and beyond media: the example of Norway. Convergence23(4): 391–408.
30.
IgnatowGRobinsonL (2017) Pierre Bourdieu: theorizing the digital. Information, Communication & Society7: 950–966.
31.
JamiesonKHCappellaJN (2010) Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
JarnessV (2015) Cultural vs economic capital: symbolic boundaries within the middle class. Sociology51: 357–373.
33.
KatzE (1996) And deliver us from segmentation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science546: 22–33.
34.
Le RouxBRouanetH (2010) Multiple Correspondence Analysis. London: Sage.
35.
LebaronF (2009) How Bourdieu ‘quantified’ Bourdieu: the geometric modeling of data. In: RobsonKSandersC (eds) Quantifying Theory: Pierre Bourdieu. Berlin: Springer, pp. 11–30.
36.
LindellJ (2015) Bourdieusian media studies: returning social theory to old and new media. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory16(3): 362-377.
37.
LindellJ (2017) Distinction recapped: digital news repertoires in the class structure. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 17November2017. DOI: 10.1177/1461444817739622.
38.
LindellJDanielssonM (2017) Moulding cultural capital into cosmopolitan capital: Media practices as reconversion work in a globalising world. Nordicom-Review38(2). DOI: 10.1515/nor-2017-0408.
39.
LindellJSartorettoP (2017) Young people, class and the news: distinction, socialization and moral sentiments. Journalism Studies. Epub ahead of print 11April2017. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2017.1310628.
40.
LivingstoneSSefton -GreenJ (2016) The Class: Living and Learning in the Digital Age. New York: New York University Press.
41.
MorleyD (2005) Texts, readers, subjects. In: HallSHobsonDLoweAet al. (eds) Culture, Media, Language. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 154–165.
42.
NeveuE (2007) Pierre Bourdieu: sociologist of media, or sociologist for media scholars?Journalism Studies8(2): 335–347.
OhlssonJLindellJArkhedeS (2017) A matter of cultural distinction: News consumption in the online media landscape. European Journal of Communication32(2): 116–130.
45.
ÖstbergKAnderssonJ (2013) Svensk Historia 1965–2012 (The history of Sweden 1965–2012). Stockholm: Nordstedts Förlag.
46.
PariserE (2011) The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web is Changing What we Read and How we Think. London: Penguin Books.
47.
PetersonRA (1997) The rise and fall of highbrow snobbery as a status marker. Poetics25: 75–92.
48.
PriorM (2007) Post-broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
RosenlundL (2000) Social Structures and Change. Stavanger: Høgskulen i Stavanger.
50.
RosenlundL (2015) Working with distinction: Scandinavian experiences. In: CoulangeonPDuvalJ (eds) The Routledge Companion to Bourdieu’s Distinction. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 157–186.
51.
SkeggsBWoodH (2011) Turning it on is a class act: immediated object relations with television. Media, Culture & Society33(6): 941–951.
52.
StrömbäckJDjerf-PierreMShehataA (2013) The dynamics of political interest and news media consumption: a longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research25(4): 414–435.
53.
SyvertsenTEnliGMj øsOJet al. (2014) The Media Welfare State. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
54.
TewksburyDRittenbergJ (2012) News on the Internet: Information and Citizenship in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
TrillingDSchoenbachK (2013) Skipping current affairs: the non-users of online and offline news. European Journal of Communication28(1): 35–51.
56.
VernersdotterF (2016) Den nationella SOM-undersökningen 2015 (The national SOM-survey 2015). In: OhlssonJOscarssonHSolevidM (eds) Ekvilibrium. Göteborg: Som-institutet, pp. 433–459.
57.
YorkCSchollRM (2015) Youth antecedents to news media consumption: parent and youth newspaper use, news discussion, and long-term news behavior. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly92(3): 681–699.
58.
ZillienNHargittaiE (2009) Digital distinction: Status specific-types of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly90(2): 274–291.
59.
ZillmannDBryantJ (eds) (1985) Selective Exposure to Communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
