Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Despite the enormous changes in the music industry in recent years, some things have persisted. Payola, the exchange of money or promotional consideration for radio airplay, has persisted if not increased over the past decade in the United States. This is due to the corresponding persistence of a series of contradictory social relationships between broadcasters, their sponsors and the audiences they seek to construct and maintain through the targeted deployment of music. I show here that payola, and its more legitimate cousin deregulation, are forms of ‘inter-elite communication’ designed to make the market in music more manageable and stable.

Keywords

elite communications hit making media deregulation payola popular music radio broadcasting

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahlkvist

(2001) Programming philosophies and the rationalization of music radio. Media, Culture & Society 23(3): 339–358.

Ahlkvist

Faulkner

(2002) ‘Will this record work for us?’ Managing music formats in commercial radio. Qualitative Sociology 25(2): 189–215.

Ahlkvist

Fisher

(2000) And the hits just keep on coming: music programming standardisation in commercial radio. Poetics 27: 301–325.

Albiniak

(2002) Music biz asks for radio probe. Broadcasting and Cable 132(22): 14.

Amoaku

(2005) The Industry. Chatsworth, CA: Image Entertainment.

Atkinson

(1994) The state, the media and thin democracy. In: Sharp

(ed.) Leap into the Dark: The Changing Role of the State in New Zealand Since 1984. Auckland: Auckland University Press, 146–150.

Bachman

Heine

(2005) Meet the new boss. Mediaweek 15(33): 14+.

Bishop

(2005) Building international empires of sound: concentrations of power and property on the ‘global’ music market. Popular Music and Society 28(4): 443–471.

Boehlert

(1996a) Cheap trick: labels buy hits by giving away bargain-priced cassette singles. Rolling Stone, 22 February, 23–4.

10.

Boehlert

(1996b) Pay to play: independent promoters cash in on the hits as alternative radio becomes big business. Rolling Stone, 22 August, 34.

11.

BPI Communications (1997) Broadcasters, labels grapple with paid airplay issue. Billboard 109–110 (52–1): 14, 99.

12.

Broadcast confidential. (1997) Rock and Rap Confidential 146: 2–3.

13.

Butler

(2005) Spitzer fallout: Sony BMG sued. Billboard 117(44): 9.

14.

Calabrese

(2004) Stealth regulation: moral meltdown and political radicalism at the Federal Communications Commission. New Media and Society 6(1): 106–113.

15.

Cave

(2004) Clear channel: inside music’s superpower. Rolling Stone, 2 September, 53, 56.

16.

Coase

(1979) Payola in radio and television broadcasting. Journal of Law and Economics 22(2): 269–328.

17.

Cobo

(2002) Radio research: how much does it determine what gets played how often? Billboard 114(50): LM1–LM6.

18.

Dannen

(1991) Hit Men: Power Brokers and Fast Money Inside the Music Business. New York: Vintage.

19.

Davis

(2000) Public relations, business news and the reproduction of corporate elite power. Journalism 1(3): 282–304.

20.

Davis

(2003) Whither mass media and power? Evidence for a critical elite theory alternative. Media, Culture & Society 25(5): 669–690.

21.

DiCola

(2006) False Premises, False Promise: A Quantitative History of Ownership Consolidation in the Radio Industry. Washington DC: The Future of Music Coalition.

22.

DiCola

Thomson

(2002) Radio Deregulation: Has It Served Citizens and Musicians? Washington DC: The Future of Music Coalition.

23.

Edwards

(2006) The fine line between placement and payola. Brandweek 47(5): 11.

24.

Eliscu

(2003) Why radio sucks. Rolling Stone, 3 April, 22.

25.

Fairchild

(1999) Deterritorializing radio: deregulation and the continuing triumph of the corporatist perspective. Media, Culture & Society 21(4): 549–562.

26.

Fairchild

(2001) Community Radio and Public Culture: Being an Examination of Media Access and Equity in the Nations of North America. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

27.

Fairchild

(2008) Pop Idols and Pirates: Mechanisms of Consumption and the Global Circulation of Popular Music. Aldershot: Ashgate.

28.

Farrish

(2002) Radio airplay 101. Canadian Musician 24(1): 10.

29.

FCC (Federal Communications Commission) (1999) Strategic Plan: A New FCC for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Federal Communications Commission.

30.

Ferguson

(2010) Inside Job. Los Angeles: Sony Pictures Classics.

31.

Fisher

(2007) Something in the Air: Radio, Rock, and the Revolution that Shaped a Generation. New York: Random House.

32.

Foege

(2008) Right of the Dial: The Rise of Clear Channel and the Fall of Commercial Radio. New York: Faber and Faber.

33.

Garofalo

(1999) From music publishing to MP3: music and industry in the 20th century. American Music 17(3): 318–354.

34.

Garrity

(2004) PDs not moved by spins. Billboard 116(26): 5, 92.

35.

Garrity

(2005a) Payola probe fallout begins. Billboard 117(32): 5–6.

36.

Garrity

(2005b) WMG latest label to pay up for payola. Billboard 117(49): 5–6.

37.

Garrity

(2006) A song at any cost. Billboard 118(23): 22–23.

38.

Gaviria

Smith

(2010) The Spill. Boston, MA: WGBH Educational Foundation.

39.

Gloede

(1993) Play-for-pay comes of age. Mediaweek 3(8): 18.

40.

Goodman

(2006) Stealth marketing and editorial integrity. Texas Law Review 85(1): 83–152.

41.

Gross

(2005) What’s wrong with payola? Slate, 27 July. Available at: http://www.slate.com/id/2123483/

42.

Harding

(2008) Indies try to turn up radio airtime. Billboard 120(45): 15.

43.

Heine

(2006) Communication breakdown? Billboard 118(14): 24.

44.

Heine

Tucker

(2007) Indie promoters on ice? Billboard 119(34): 8.

45.

Herman

McChesney

(1997) The Global Media: The New Missionaries of Global Capitalism, London: Cassell.

46.

Holland

(2002) Artists, labels lobby FCC. Billboard 114(22): 4.

47.

Huntemann

(1999) Corporate interference: the commercialization and concentration of radio post the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Journal of Communication Inquiry 23(4): 390–407.

48.

Jouvenal

(2008) More Static: Independent Labels and Commercial Airplay 18 Months after the FCC Consent Decree and the ‘Rules of Engagement’. Washington, DC: American Association of Independent Music and The Future of Music Coalition.

49.

Just why exactly do we need the music industry? (1998) Rock and Rap Confidential 148: 1–2.

50.

Kielbowicz

Lawson

(2004) Unmasking hidden commercials in broadcasting: origins of the sponsorship identification regulations, 1927–1963. Federal Communications Law Journal 56(2): 329–376.

51.

Kingsley

(2011) Is Twitter the new celebrity PR? Guardian.co.uk , 22 February. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/feb/22/is-twitter-new-celebrity-pr

52.

Kirk

(2004) The Way the Music Died. Boston, MA: WGBH Educational Foundation.

53.

Kot

(2001) What’s wrong with radio? Rolling Stone, 16 August, 25–6.

54.

Manly

(2006) Is it a show or a commercial? New York Times, 9 January, 14.

55.

Martens

(2005) After payola settlement, airplay still meager for indie acts. Billboard 117(33): 6.

56.

Martens

(2007a) More airplay for indies? Billboard 119(11): 6.

57.

Martens

(2007b) Indies build coalition to advance mainstream airplay. Billboard 119(20): 18.

58.

McChesney

(1993) Telecommunications, Mass Media, and Democracy: The Battle for the Control of U.S. Broadcasting, 1928–1935. New York: Oxford University Press.

59.

McConnell

(2003) Clear channel drops pay-for-play deals. Broadcasting and Cable 133(15): 3.

60.

Mokhiber

(2005) Sony’s Payola. Multinational Monitor, July/August, 70.

61.

Mol

Wijnberg

(2007) Competition, selection and rock and roll: the economics of payola and authenticity. Journal of Economic Issues 41(3): 701–714.

62.

Morris

(2000) Isgro pleads not guilty to extortion charges. Billboard 112(14): 3, 78.

63.

Moses

(2011) Secret sell: brands exploit viral videos. Sydney Morning Herald. Available at: http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/secret-sell-brands-exploit-viral-videos-20110224-1b61p.html

64.

Moss

Fein

(2003) Radio regulation revisited: Coase, the FCC, and the public interest. Journal of Policy History 15(4): 389–416.

65.

Negus

(1993) Plugging and programming: pop radio and record promotion in Britain and the United States. Popular Music 12(1): 57–68.

66.

Phillips

(1996) Labels need new strategies for radio. Billboard 108(30): 5.

67.

Pride

McGeever

Lorenz

McClure

. (1998) Global views vary on pay-for-play. Billboard 110(19): 82–83.

68.

Prins

(2006) Other People’s Money: The Corporate Mugging of America. New York: New Press.

69.

Radio killed the concert star. (1996) Rock and Rap Confidential 131: 4.

70.

Ramey

(2007) Mass Media Unleashed: How Washington Policymakers Shortchanged the American Public. Lanham, MS: Rowman and Littlefield.

71.

Rennhoff

(2010) The consequences of ‘consideration payments’: lessons from payola. Review of Industrial Organization 36(2): 133–47.

72.

Rose

(2006) Post-Spitzer, indie labels still need access to radio PDs. Billboard 118(19): 4.

73.

Ross

(2003) Just how standardized are today’s radio stations? Billboard 115(31): 6, 56.

74.

Salganik

Dodds

Watt

(2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(10 February): 854–856.

75.

Saxe

(2000) Are consultants worth the cost? Billboard 112(38): 80, 84.

76.

Seabrook

(2003) The money note: can the record business be saved? New Yorker 79(18): 42–55. Available at: http://www.ufomusic.com/about/articles/jason_flom_article.pdf

77.

Segrave

(1994) Payola in the Music Industry: A History, 1880–1991. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Co.

78.

Serpick

(2006) FCC targets radio giants – stations tighten playlists as investigation expands. Rolling Stone, 18 May, 42.

79.

Silberman

(1999) Virtual radio becomes real option. Billboard 111(6): 69–70.

80.

Silberman

(2000) The new face of radio: Synd City. Billboard 112(42): 104.

81.

Stark

(1999) Do MDs still call the shots at radio? Billboard 111(49): 3, 149.

82.

Sterne

Yorke

(2009) Remote control. Billboard 121(19): 8.

83.

Surowiecki

(2004) Paying to play. New Yorker 80(19): 42.

84.

Taibbi

(2011) Why isn’t Wall Street in jail? Rolling Stone Online. Available at: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-isnt-wall-street-in-jail-20110216

85.

Taylor

(1998) Paid play changing biz landscape. Billboard 110(19): 1, 82.

86.

Thigpen

(1998) Is that a song or a sales pitch? Time 153(5): 73.

87.

Thomson

(2009) Same Old Song: An Analysis of Radio Playlists in a Post-FCC Consent Decree World. Washington, DC: The Future of Music Coalition.

88.

Thussu

(2007) News as Entertainment: The Rise of Global Infotainment. Los Angeles: Sage.

89.

Winseck

(2002) Netscapes of power: convergence, consolidation and power in the Canadian mediascape. Media, Culture & Society 24(6): 795–819.

Alan Freed still casts a long shadow: the persistence of payola and the ambiguous value of music

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References