Although the 2003 Iraq invasion was not wholly framed as a ‘humanitarian intervention’, the rhetoric of bringing liberation, democratization and human rights to the Iraqi people was widely advanced by the coalition and supporters as a legitimating reason for war. This article assesses the role played by press photography in legitimizing or challenging this crucial framing during the invasion across a range of UK national newspapers. Privileging visual content in research design, the study presents selected results from a comprehensive content and framing analysis of press photography during the invasion period (March–April 2003), specifically examining the prominence and treatment of photographs in the humanitarian-related visual coverage, along with the accompanying words used to define, support or detract from the events depicted. While finding that the rationale of humanitarianism generally played well for the coalition during this study period, this article explores the problematic nature of the narrative of liberation.
EntmanRM (2004) Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and US Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
FahmyS (2007) ‘They took it down’: exploring determinants of visual reporting in the toppling of the Saddam statue in national and international newspapers. Mass Communication & Society10(2): 143–170.
14.
FahmySKimD (2008) Picturing the Iraq War: constructing the image of war in the British and US press. International Communication Gazette70(6): 443–462.
15.
FreedlandJ (2010) Campbell may be a true believer, but Iraq has poisoned our faith in politics. The Guardian, 13January, p. 29.
16.
GitlinT (1980) The Whole World Is Watching. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17.
GoddardPRobinsonPParryK (2008) Patriotism meets plurality: reporting the 2003 Iraq War in the British press. Media, War & Conflict1(1): 9–30.
18.
GriffinM (2004) Picturing America’s ‘War on Terrorism’ in Afghanistan and Iraq. Journalism5(4): 381–402.
19.
HallinDCGitlinT (1994) The Gulf War as popular culture and television drama. In: BennettWLPaletzDL (eds) Taken by Storm. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 149–163.
20.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HammondP (2007a) Framing Post-Cold War Conflicts: The Media and International Intervention. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
22.
HammondP (2007b) Media, War and Postmodernity. London and New York: Routledge.
23.
HansenACottleSNegrineRNewboldC (1998) Mass Communication Research Methods. New York: New York University Press.
24.
HarimanRLucaitesJL (2007) No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
HoskinsAO’LoughlinB (2007) Television and Terror: Conflicting Times and the Crisis of News Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
HoskinsAO’LoughlinB (2010) War and Media: The Emergence of Diffused War. Cambridge: Polity.
27.
HoweP (2002) Shooting Under Fire: The World of the War Photographer. New York: Artisan.
28.
KeithSSchwalbeCBSilcockBW (2010) Comparing war images across media platforms: methodological challenges for content analysis. Media, War & Conflict3(1): 87–98.
29.
KellnerD (1992) The Persian Gulf TV War. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30.
KellnerD (2005) Media Spectacle and the Crisis of Democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
31.
KennedyL (2008) Securing vision: photography and US foreign policy. Media, Culture & Society30(3): 279–294.
32.
KingGKeohaneROVerbaS (1994) Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
KonstantinidouC (2008) The spectacle of suffering and death: the photographic representation of war in Greek newspapers. Visual Communication7(2): 143–169.
34.
KozolW (2004) Domesticating NATO’s war in Kosovo/a: (in)visible bodies and the dilemma of photojournalism. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism4(2): 1–38.
35.
KressG (2010) Multimodality. London: Routledge.
36.
LewisJBrookesRMosdellNThreadgoldT (2006) Shoot First and Ask Questions Later: Media Coverage of the 2003 Iraq War. New York: Peter Lang.
37.
LinfieldS (2010) The Cruel Radiance: Photography and Political Violence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
LutzCACollinsJL (1993) Reading National Geographic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
MathesonDAllanS (2009) Digital War Reporting. Cambridge: Polity.
40.
MessarisPAbrahamL (2001) The role of images in framing news stories. In: ReeseSGandyOGrantA (eds) Framing Public Life. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 215–226.
41.
MitchellWJT (2005) There are no visual media. Journal of Visual Culture4(2): 257–266.
42.
MoorcroftPLTaylorPM (2008) Shooting the Messenger: The Political Impact of War Reporting. Washington, DC: Potomac.
ParryK (2009) Visually framing the 2003 Iraq invasion in British press photography. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
45.
ParryK (2010a) Media visualisation of conflict: studying news imagery in 21st century wars. Sociology Compass4(7): 417–429.
46.
ParryK (2010b) A visual framing analysis of British press photography during the 2006 Israel–Lebanon conflict. Media, War and Conflict3(1): 67–85.
47.
PerlmutterDD (1999) Visions of War: Picturing Warfare from the Stone Age to the Cyber Age. New York: St Martin’s Griffin.
48.
PfauMHaighMGettleMDonnellyMScottGWarrD. (2004) Embedding journalists in military combat units: impact on story frames and tone. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly81(1): 74–88.
49.
RobinsonP (2002) The CNN Effect: The Myth of News, Foreign Policy and Intervention. London: Routledge.
50.
RobinsonPGoddardPParryKMurrayCTaylorPM (2010) Pockets of Resistance: British News Media, War and Theory in the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
51.
RodríguezLDimitrovaD (2008) The levels of visual framing. Paper presented at the 58th Annual ICA Conference, Montreal, 22–26 May.
52.
RoseG (2001) Visual Methodologies. London: Sage.
53.
RoslerM (1989) In, around and afterthoughts (on documentary photography). In: BoltonR (ed.) The Contest of Meaning: Critical Histories of Photography. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 303–342.
54.
SekulaA (1982) On the invention of photographic meaning. In: BurginV (ed.) Thinking Photography. London: Macmillan, 84–109.
55.
Soloman-GodeauA (1991) Photography at the Dock: Essays on Photographic History, Institutions and Practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
56.
SontagS (1979) On Photography. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
57.
SontagS (2003) Regarding the Pain of Others. London: Penguin.
58.
SteeleJ (2008) Defeat: Why They Lost Iraq. London: I.B. Tauris.
59.
TaggJ (1988) The Burden of Representation: Essays on Photographies and Histories. London: Macmillan.
60.
TathamS (2006) Losing Arab Hearts and Minds: The Coalition, Al Jazeera and Muslim Public Opinion. London: Hurst and Co.
61.
Trivundža ITomanić (2004) Orientalism as news: pictorial representations of the US attack on Iraq in Delo. Journalism5(4): 480–499.
62.
Trivundža ITomanić (2006) Many voices, one picture: photographic coverage of foreign news in Slovenian daily press (1980, 2004). Javnost/The Public13(2): 21–40.
63.
TumberHPalmerJ (2004) Media at War: The Iraq Crisis. London: Sage.
64.
WrightT (2008) Visual Impact: Culture and the Meaning of Images. Oxford: Berg.
65.
ZelizerB (1998) Remembering to Forget: Holocaust Memory through the Camera’s Eye. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66.
ZelizerB (2004) When war is reduced to a photograph. In: AllanSZelizerB (eds) Reporting War: Journalism in Wartime. London: Routledge, 115–135.
67.
ZillmannDKnoblochSYuHS (2001) Effects of photographs on the selective reading of news reports. Media Psychology3: 301–324.
68.
ŽižekS (2004) Iraq: The Borrowed Kettle. London: Verso.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
