Being perceived as family-engaged is assumed to benefit politicians, augmenting moral capital they can trade for votes and power. Moral capital benefits of family engagement are particularly salient for male politicians, whose relationship to family generally invokes responsibility and strength. Is family engagement a moral capital resource for female politicians, whose stereotypical associations with family invoke dependency and support? This manuscript examines the fictional television series Commander in Chief, the first to seriously engage the issue of a female US president, juxtaposing her political life with her domestic life as a working wife and mother. Analysis of gender stereotypes deployed in the family narrative suggests that family engagement may not represent a moral capital resource for this fictional female politician, undermining the audience’s ability to see her as moral capital-worthy in the political sphere. Application is made to actual female politicians in the United States.
Acker J. ( 1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations . Gender and Society4(2): 139-158.
2.
Adams M. ( 2006) Women’s rights and wedding bells: 19th century pro-family rhetoric and (re) enforcement of the gender status quo. Journal of Family Issues28(4): 501-528.
3.
Bazinet KR ( 2008) From drab to fab! GOP doled out 150G to gussy up Sarah . Daily News (New York), 22 October, p. 5.
4.
Belsky J. ( 2001) Developmental risks (still) associated with early child care. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry42(7): 845-859.
5.
Bianculli D. ( 2005) ‘Chief’ elects to be unoriginal. Daily News (New York), 27 September, p. 99.
6.
Biernat M. and Wortman CB ( 1991) Sharing of home responsibilities between professionally employed women and their husbands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology60(6): 844-860.
7.
Bittman M., England P., Folbre N., et al. (2003) When does gender trump money? American Journal of Sociology109(1): 186-214.
8.
Blankenhorn D. ( 1996) Fatherless America. New York: Harper Perennial.
9.
Bourdieu P. ( 1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson JG (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 241-258.
10.
Bowlby J. ( 1953) Child Care and the Growth of Love. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
11.
Buckman A. ( 2006) ‘Commander’ pales next to ‘West Wing’ . The New York Post, 16 April, p. 3.
12.
Connell RW ( 1990) An iron man. In: Messner MA and Sabo DF (eds) Sport, Men and the Gender Order. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 83-95.
13.
Copeland L. ( 2008) Belittled woman; the candidate refuses to bend or bow out: cue another chorus of ‘Poor Hillary’. Washington Post, 16 May, p. C-01.
14.
Cott N. ( 2000) Public Vows. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Deaux K. and Kite M. ( 1987) Thinking about gender. In: Hess BB and Ferree MM (eds) Analyzing Gender. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 92-117.
16.
Derichs C., Fleschenberg A. and Hüstebeck M. ( 2006) Gendering moral capital. Critical Asian Studies38(3): 245-270.
17.
DeVault ML ( 1991) Feeding the Family. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Dow BJ ( 1996) Prime Time Feminism. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
19.
Duffy M. ( 2006) First Gent Ready to Shift into High Gear. Detroit Free Press, 17 January, p. F07.
20.
Falk E. and Jamieson K. ( 2003) Changing the climate of expectations. In: Watson RP and Gordon A (eds) Anticipating Madam President. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 43-52.
21.
Faludi S. (1991) Backlash. New York: Crown.
22.
Ferree MM ( 1990) Beyond separate spheres. Journal of Marriage and Family53(4): 866-884.
23.
Fuchs B. (2004) Romance. New York: Routledge.
24.
Gray J. ( 2004) Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus: The Classic Guide to Understanding the Opposite Sex. New York: Harper.
25.
Greenstein TN ( 2000) Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home. Journal of Marriage and the Family62(2): 322-335.
26.
Guendouzi J. ( 2006) ‘The guilt thing’: balancing domestic and professional roles. Journal of Marriage and Family68(4): 901-909.
27.
Harnden T. ( 2006) The woman Republicans love to hate: Nancy Pelosi; if Democrats win, she’s next speaker. Daily Telegraph ( London), 30 October 30, A16.
28.
Hays S. ( 1996) The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
Heldenfels RD ( 2006) ‘Commander in Chief’ struggles: show back, but has tough time slot, plot problems. The Akron Beacon Journal , 13 April, p. E1.
30.
Helman S. and Issenberg S. ( 2008) Late surge of sympathy may have aided Clinton: many factors swayed voters, analysts sayThe Boston Globe, 10 January, p. A18.
31.
Huddy L. and Terkildsen N. ( 1993) Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science37(1): 119-147.
32.
Kane J. ( 2001) The Politics of Moral Capital. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
33.
Katz C. ( 2007) Retired General Clark backs ‘smart, decisive, strong’ Hillary. Daily News (New York), 16 September, p. 15.
34.
Kennedy H. ( 2008) Losing it made Hil a big winner: weepy breakdown sent women flowing to her in droves’, Daily News ( New York), 10 January, p. 4.
35.
Kimmel M. ( 1996) Manhood in America. New York: Free Press.
36.
Komter A. ( 1989) Hidden power in marriage. Journal of Family Issues3(2): 187-216.
37.
Lakoff G. ( 2002) Moral Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Lawless JL and Fox RL ( 2005) It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office . New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Lorber J. ( 1994) Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
40.
Meek JG and Saltonstall D. ( 2008) Hockey mom drops gloves! Sarah calls herself a pit bull, then repeatedly sinks teeth into Obama. Daily News ( New York), 4 September, p. 5.
41.
Nock SL ( 1998) Marriage in Men’s Lives. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Paglia C. ( 2008) Sarah Palin: a feminist triumph or the most under-qualified vice-president ever?The Sunday Times ( London), 14 September, p. 6.
43.
Popenoe D. ( 1988) Disturbing the Nest. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
44.
Pyke KD ( 1994) Women’s employment as a gift or burden? Marital power across marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Gender & Society8(1): 73-91.
45.
Pyke KD and Coltrane S. ( 1996) Entitlement, obligation, and gratitude in family work . Journal of Family Issues17(1): 60-82.
46.
Rhee F. ( 2008) Palin on defensive as scrutiny rises: spent $150,000 of RNC money for clothing. The Boston Globe, 23 October, p. A18.
47.
Risman BJ ( 2004) Gender as a social structure. Gender and Society18(4): 429-450.
48.
Siemaszko C. ( 2008) Smiling barracuda Palin congenial & ‘calculating’, says nominee’s Miss Alaska foe. Daily News ( New York), 9 September, p. 9.
49.
Slater MD, Rouner D. and Long M. ( 2006) Television dramas and support for controversial public policies. Journal of Communication56(2): 235-252.
50.
Spary C. ( 2007) Female political leadership in India. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics45(3): 253-277.
51.
Thorson E., Christ WG and Caywood C. ( 1991) Effects of issue-image strategies, attack and support appeals, music, and visual content in political commercials. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media35(4): 465-486.
52.
Tichenor VJ ( 1999) Status and income as gendered resources. Journal of Marriage and Family61(3): 638-650.
53.
Tichenor VJ ( 2005) Maintaining men’s dominance: negotiating identity and power when she earns more. Sex Roles53(3/4): 191-205.
54.
Trujillo N. ( 1991) Hegemonic masculinity on the mound. Critical Studies in Mass Communication8(3): 290-308.
55.
Watson RP ( 2003) Introduction: the White House as ultimate prize. In Watson RP and Gordon A (eds) Anticipating Madam President. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1-17.
56.
Weintraub J. ( 2006) Television president needs a command performance. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 20 April, p. E Cue, 1.
57.
West C. and Zimmerman DH ( 1987) Doing gender. Gender and Society1(2): 125-151.
58.
Wörsching M. ( 2000) Sporting metaphors and the enactment of hegemonic masculinity . Journal of Popular Culture34(3): 59-85.
