Audience studies, as they have been traditionally associated with cultural studies, have recognized relations of power at each end of the communication process, privileging the framework of ‘text-reader’ relations. This article offers an alternative method of reception analysis which seeks to overcome text/reader/context distinctions and place the communicative ‘act’ itself at the centre. It argues that broadcasting needs to be understood within the terms of communication per se with specific tools designed for that dedicated purpose. A model for reception analysis is offered which captures the specifically communicative relationship between daytime talk programmes and viewers by using a ‘text-in-action’ approach. The findings illuminate the viewing experiences as pragmatically negotiated discursive encounters, establishing the possibility of a ‘mediated conversational floor’.
Ang, I. (1985) Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. London: Methuen .
2.
Austin, J. (1963) How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
3.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press .
4.
Brown, M. (1994) Soap Opera and Women's Talk. London and New York: Sage .
5.
Buckingham, D. (1993) Children Talking Television: The Making of Television Literacy. London: Falmer Press .
6.
Cameron, D. (1995) ‘Rethinking Language and Gender Studies: Some Issues for the 1990s’, pp. 31–44 in S. Mills (ed.) Language and Gender. Milton Keynes: Open University Press .
7.
Coates, J. (1993) Women, Men and Language. London: Longman .
8.
Coates, J. (1994) ‘No Gaps, Lots of Overlap: Turn-taking Patterns in the Talk of Women Friends’, in D. Graddol , J. Maybin and B. Stierer (eds) Researching Language and Literacy in Social Context. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters .
9.
Coates, J. (1996) Women Talk: Conversations Between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell .
10.
Corner, J. , K. Richardson and N. Fenton (1990) Nuclear Reactions: Form and Response in ‘Public Issue’ Television. London: John Libbey .
11.
Giddens, A. (1991) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity .
12.
Gillespie, M. (1995) Television, Ethnicity and Cultural Change. London: Routledge .
13.
Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
14.
Hall, S. (1980) ‘Encoding/Decoding’, in S. Hall , D. Hobson , A. Lowe and P. Willis (eds) Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies. London: Hutchinson .
15.
Hall, S. (1989 [1980]) ‘Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms’, in T. Bennett , G. Martin , C. Mercer and J. Woollacott (eds) Culture, Ideology and Social Process: A Reader. Buckingham: Open University Press .
16.
Heritage, J. (1985) ‘Analysing News: Aspects of Talk for the Overhearing Audience’, in T. Van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 3: Genres of Discourse. New York: Academic Press .
17.
Heritage, J. and D. Greatbatch (1991) ‘On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews’, in D. Boden and D. Zimmerman (eds) Talk as Social Structure. Cambridge: Polity Press .
18.
Hobson, D. (1982) Crossroads – The Drama of a Soap Opera. London: Methuen .
19.
Horton, D. and R. Wohl (1956) ‘Mass Communication and Para-social Interaction: Observations on Intimacy at a Distance’ , Psychiatry19(3): 215–229 .
20.
Hutchby, I. and R. Wooffitt (1998) Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press .
21.
Jhally, S. and J. Lewis (1992) Enlightened Racism: ‘The Cosby Show’, Audiences and the Myth of the American Dream. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
22.
Livingstone, S. and P. Lunt (1994) Talk on Television. London: Routledge .
Moores, S. (1997) ‘Broadcasting and Its Audiences’, in H. Mackay (ed.) Consumption and Everyday Life. London: Sage/Open University Press .
25.
Moores, S. (2000) Media and Everyday Life in Modern Society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press .
26.
Morley, D. (1980) The Nationwide Audience. London: BFI .
27.
Munson, W. (1993) All Talk: The Talk Show in Media Culture. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press .
28.
Naficy, H. (1993) The Making of Exile Cultures: Iranian Television in Los Angeles. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press .
29.
Peck, J. (1995) ‘TV Talk Shows as Therapeutic Discourse: The Ideological Labour of the Talking Cure’ , Communication Theory5(1): 58–81 .
30.
Rakow, L. (ed.) (1992) Women Making Meaning: New Feminist Directions in Communication. New York: Routledge .
31.
Ross, K. and V. Nightingale (2003) Media and Audiences: New Perspectives. Maidenhead: Open University Press .
32.
Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation, edited by G. Jefferson . Oxford: Blackwell .
33.
Sacks, H. , E.A. Schegloff , G. Jefferson (1974) ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn-taking in Conversation’ , Language50(4): 696–735 .
34.
Scannell, P. (1991) ‘Introduction: The Relevance of Talk’, in P. Scannell (ed.) Broadcast Talk. London: Sage .
35.
Scannell, P. (1996) Radio, Television and Modern Public Life. Oxford: Blackwell .
36.
Schlesinger, P. , R.E. Dobash , R.P. Dobash and C.K. Weaver (1992) Women Viewing Violence. London: BFI .
37.
Schrøder, K. (2000) ‘Making Sense of Audience Discourses: Towards a Multidimensional Model of Mass Media Reception’ , European Journal of Cultural Studies3(2): 233–258 .
38.
Searle, J. (1969) Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
39.
Seiter, E. (1999) Television and New Media Audiences. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
40.
Silverstone, R. (1994) Television and Everyday Life. London: Routledge .
41.
Thompson, J. (1995) The Media and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity .
42.
Tolson, A. (2001) ‘Talking about Talk: The Academic Debates’, pp. 7–30 in A. Tolson (ed.) Television Talk Shows: Discourse, Performance, Spectacle. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
43.
Volosinov, V.N. (1973) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. New York: Seminar Press .
44.
Walkerdine, V. (1986) ‘Video Replay: Families, Films and Fantasy’, in V. Burgin , J. Donald and C. Kaplan (eds) Formations of Fantasy. London: Methuen .
45.
Wood, H. (2001) ‘Interacting with Television’, unpublished PhD thesis, Open University.
46.
Wood, H. (2005) ‘Texting the Subject: Gender, Television and Modern Self-reflexivity’ , Communication Review8(2): 115–135 .
