Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The internet is often portrayed as a borderless liberal space of equal opportunities and unconstrained communication. By contrast, this article emphasizes the profoundly contested nature of the communication on ‘the web’. Based on a short period of close observation of one internet newsgroup, this study illuminates specific discursive strategies by means of which domination, cooption, resistance and exclusion enter the virtual space of internet communication. In addition, the liberal character of the internet is observed to be not so much due to the reign of liberal principles as due to the strategic advantage enjoyed by ‘liberal actors’ in newsgroup exchanges. Hence, the study illuminates major mechanisms of the ‘liberal domination’ in the net as well as the operations of power in contemporary liberal societies at large.

Keywords

discursive analysis Habermas internet liberalism power

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bakhtin, M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press .

Bakhtin, M. and P. Medvedev (1985) The Formal Method in Literary Scholarship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

Benhabib, S. (1996) ‘Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy’, pp. 67-94 in S. Benhabib (ed.) Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .

Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

Bourdieu, P. and J.-C. Passeron (1990) Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage .

Brown, R. and C. Herndl (1996) ‘Beyond the Realm of Reason: Understanding the Extreme Environmental Rhetoric of the John Birch Society’, in pp. 213-235 in C. Herndle and S. Brown (eds) Green Culture: Environmental Rhetoric in Contemporary America. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press .

Eley, G. (1994) ‘Nations, Publics, and Political Culture: Placing Habermas in the 19th century’, in N.B. Dirks , G. Eley and S. Ortner (eds) Culture/Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .

Erlich, V. (1981) Russian Formalism: History - Doctrine. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .

Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman .

10.

Fraser, N. (1992) ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy’, pp. 109-142 in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

11.

Gimmler, A. (2001) ‘Deliberative Democracy, the Public Sphere and the Internet’ , Philosophy and Social Criticism 27(4): 21-39 .

12.

Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press .

13.

Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row .

14.

Habermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

15.

Habermas, J. (1993) ‘Further Reflections on the Public Sphere’, pp. 421-461 in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

16.

Habermas, J. (1998) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .

17.

Hanks, W. (2000) Intertexts: Writing on Language, Utterance, and Context. Boston, MA: Rowman and Littlefield .

18.

Havisher, G. and P. Sullivan (1999) ‘Fleeting Images: Women Visually Writing the Web’, pp. 268-291 in G. Havisher and C. Selfe (eds) Passions, Pedagogies, and 21st Century Technologies. Logan: Utah State University Press .

19.

Hengst, J. and P. Miller (1999) ‘The Heterogeneity of Discourse Genres: Implications for Development’ , World Englishes 18: 325-341 .

20.

Howcroft, D. (1999) ‘The Hyperbolic Age of Information: An Empirical Study of Internet Usage’ , Information, Communication and Society 2(3): 277-299 .

21.

Peters, B. (1997) ‘On Public Deliberation and Public Culture: Reflections on the Public Sphere’ , InIIS-Arbeitspapier 7: 42-76 .

22.

Rommetveit, R. (1992) ‘Outlines of a Dialogically Based Social-Cognitive Approach to Human Cognition and Communication’, pp. 19-44 in A. Wold (ed.) The Dialogical Alternative: Toward a Theory of Language and Mind. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press .

23.

Young, I.M. (1987) ‘Impartiality and the Civic Public: Some Implications of Feminist Critiques of Moral and Political Theory’, pp. 56-77 in S. Benhabib and D. Cornell (eds) Feminism as Critique. Cambridge: Polity Press .

24.

Wysocki, A. (forthcoming) ‘The Multiple Media of Texts: How Onscreen and Paper Texts Incorporate Words, Images, and Other Media’, in C. Bazerman and P. Prior (eds) What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analysis of Test and Textual Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .

The politics of the web: the case of one newsgroup

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References