Effective feedback is crucial for educating health professions students. This systematic review investigates the impact of extrinsic feedback on health professions students, encompassing medical, dental, and nursing fields. Through meticulous gathering and analysis of 37 studies, this review highlights verbal and visual feedback as predominant forms, often delivered immediately by instructors and supplemented by peer or simulated input. Notably, technology is increasingly utilised to enhance the provision of feedback. The impacts of feedback span various domains, including surgical skills and patient communication, revealing notable improvements in procedural skills such as suturing and knot-tying, as well as general patient communication proficiency. Meta-analyses underscore significant enhancements in communication skills and provide nuanced insights into chest compression techniques. Overall, the findings provide initial evidence that extrinsic feedback enhances surgical procedural skills and general patient communication proficiency among health professions students. The evolving role of technology in feedback provision is promising. Future studies should assess extrinsic feedback across different health professions to better understand its impacts and alignment with specific educational needs and accreditation standards, thereby enhancing learning outcomes.
*AhnC.LeeJ.OhJ.SongY.CheeY.LimT. H.KangH.ShinH. (2017). Effectiveness of feedback with a smartwatch for high-quality chest compressions during adult cardiac arrest: A randomized controlled simulation study. PLoS One, 12(4), e0169046–e0169049. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169046
2.
*Al FayyadhM. J.HassanR. A.TranZ. K.KempenichJ. W.BuneginL.DentD. L.WillisR. E. (2017). Immediate auditory feedback is superior to other types of feedback for basic surgical skills acquisition. Journal of Surgical Education, 74(6), e55–e61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.08.005
3.
*Al-JundiW.ElsharifM.AndersonM.ChanP.BeardJ.NawazS. (2017). A randomized controlled trial to compare e-feedback versus “standard” face-to-face verbal feedback to improve the acquisition of procedural skill. Journal of Surgical Education, 74(3), 390–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.11.011
4.
AlmusaedA.AlmssadA.YitmenI.HomodR. Z. (2023). Enhancing student engagement: Harnessing “AIED”’s power in hybrid education—a review analysis. Education Sciences, 13(7), 632–724. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070632
5.
*BeckersS. K.BiermannH.SopkaS.SkorningM.BrokmannJ. C.HeussenN.RossaintR.YounkerJ. (2012). Influence of pre-course assessment using an emotionally activating stimulus with feedback: A pilot study in teaching basic life support. Resuscitation, 83(2), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.08.024
6.
*BerneyA.CarrardV.Schmid MastM.BonvinR.StiefelF.BourquinC. (2017). Individual training at the undergraduate level to promote competence in breaking bad news in oncology. Psycho-Oncology, 26(12), 2232–2237. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4452
7.
BienstockJ. L.KatzN. T.CoxS. M.HueppchenN.EricksonS.PuscheckE. E.Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Undergraduate Medical Education Committee. (2007). To the point: Medical education reviews—providing feedback. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 196(6), 508–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.021
8.
*BoehlerM. L.RogersD. A.SchwindC. J.MayforthR.QuinJ.WilliamsR. G.DunningtonG. (2006). An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: A randomised controlled trial. Medical Education, 40(8), 746–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02503.x
9.
BrauerD. G.FergusonK. J. (2015). The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE guide No. 96. Medical Teacher, 37(4), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.970998
10.
BurgessA.van DiggeleC.RobertsC.MellisC. (2020). Feedback in the clinical setting. BMC Medical Education, 20(Suppl 2), 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02280-5
11.
*ChamberlandM.SetrakianJ.St-OngeC.BergeronL.MamedeS.SchmidtH. G. (2019). Does providing the correct diagnosis as feedback after self-explanation improve medical students diagnostic performance?BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1638-3
12.
CheungM. W. L. (2019). A guide to conducting a meta-analysis with non-independent effect sizes. Neuropsychology Review, 29(4), 387–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-019-09415-6
13.
CullenM.CadoganC.GeorgeS.MurphyS.FreeneyS.FitzpatrickR.StrawbridgeJ. (2022). Key stakeholders’ views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions' education: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03373-z
14.
*DeLeonS.MothnerB.MiddlemanA. (2018). Improving student documentation using a feedback tool. The Clinical Teacher, 15(1), 48–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12625
15.
*DenadaiR.ToledoA. P.OshiiwaM.Saad-HossneR. (2013). Acquisition of suture skills during medical graduation by instructor-directed training: A randomized controlled study comparing senior medical students and faculty surgeons. Updates in Surgery, 65(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-013-0199-y
16.
*DíezN.Rodríguez-DíezM. C.NagoreD.FernándezS.FerrerM.BeunzaJ. J. (2013). A randomized trial of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for medical students: Voice advisory mannequin compared to guidance provided by an instructor. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 8(4), 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e31828e7196
*EngererC.BerberatP. O.DinkelA.RudolphB.SattelH.WuenschA. (2019). Specific feedback makes medical students better communicators. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1470-9
19.
*FarquharsonA. L.CresswellA. C.BeardJ. D.ChanP. (2013). Randomized trial of the effect of video feedback on the acquisition of surgical skills. British Journal of Surgery, 100(11), 1448–1453. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9237
20.
FleissJ. L. (1993). Review papers: The statistical basis of meta-analysis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2(2), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029300200202
21.
FrankJ. R.SnellL. S.CateO. T.HolmboeE. S.CarraccioC.SwingS. R.HarrisP.GlasgowN. J.CampbellC.DathD.HardenR. M.IobstW.LongD. M.MungrooR.RichardsonD. L.SherbinoJ.SilverI.TaberS.TalbotM.HarrisK. A. (2010). Competency-based medical education: Theory to practice. Medical Teacher, 32(8), 638–645. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190
22.
HattieJ.GanM. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 303–319). Routledge.
*Herrmann-WernerA.LodaT.ErschensR.SchneiderP.JunneF.GilliganC.TeufelM.ZipfelS.KeifenheimK. E. (2019). Face yourself! - learning progress and shame in different approaches of video feedback: A comparative study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1519-9
25.
HigginsJ. P. T.AltmanD. G.GøtzscheP. C.JüniP.MoherD.OxmanA. D.SavovicJ.SchulzK. F.WeeksL.SterneJ. A.Cochrane Bias Methods Group. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 343(1), d5928–d5929. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
26.
HigginsJ. P. T.ThompsonS. G.DeeksJ. J.AltmanD. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
27.
*HobgoodC. D.Tamayo-SarverJ. H.HollarD. W.Jr.SawningS. (2009). Griev_Ing: Death notification skills and applications for fourth-year medical students. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 21(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401330903018450
28.
HounsellD. (2003). The evaluation of teaching. In FryH.KetteridgeS.MarshallS. (Eds.), A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice (2nd ed., pp. 200–212). Kogan Page.
29.
*KovacsG.BullockG.Ackroyd-StolarzS.CainE.PetrieD. (2000). A randomized controlled trial on the effect of educational interventions in promoting airway management skill maintenance. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 36(4), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2000.109339
30.
*KrauseF.SchmalzG.HaakR.RockenbauchK. (2017). The impact of expert- and peer feedback on communication skills of undergraduate dental students - a single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(12), 2275–2282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.025
31.
*LaiM. M. Y.RobertsN.MohebbiM.MartinJ. (2020). A randomised controlled trial of feedback to improve patient satisfaction and consultation skills in medical students. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 277–310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02171-9
32.
*LardonA.CheronC.PagéI.DugasC.DescarreauxM. (2016). Systematic augmented feedback and dependency in spinal manipulation learning: A randomized comparative study. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 39(3), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.02.002
33.
*LiQ.ZhouR. H.LiuJ.LinJ.MaE. L.LiangP.ShiT. W.FangL. Q.XiaoH. (2013). Pre-training evaluation and feedback improved skills retention of basic life support in medical students. Resuscitation, 84(9), 1274–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.04.017
34.
*LinE. C.ChenS. L.ChaoS. Y.ChenY. C. (2013). Using standardized patient with immediate feedback and group discussion to teach interpersonal and communication skills to advanced practice nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 33(6), 677–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.002
35.
LiuK.ZhangW.LiW.WangT.ZhengY. (2023). Effectiveness of virtual reality in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education, 23(9), 710. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04662-x
36.
MakV.MaloneD.KarunaratneN.YaoW.RandellL.VuT. (2022). A video-based reflective design to prepare first year pharmacy students for their first Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Healthcare, 10(2), 280–313. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020280
37.
*McCoyC. E.RahmanA.RendonJ. C.AndersonC. L.LangdorfM. I.LotfipourS.ChakravarthyB. (2019). Randomized controlled trial of simulation vs. standard training for teaching medical students high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 20(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2018.11.39040
38.
Murillo-LlorenteM. T.Navarro-MartínezO.ValleV. I.Pérez-BermejoM. (2021). Using the reflective journal to improve practical skills integrating affective and self-critical aspects in impoverished international environments. A pilot test. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8876–8912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168876
39.
NarcissS. (2013). Designing and evaluating tutoring feedback strategies for digital learning. Digital Education Review, 23(1), 7–26.
40.
*NematianH.MasoumniaA. M.ShakibaS.MilanN.VahdatiZ.Oryadi ZanjaniL.Saeid ErshadiF.MehrpourS. R.PayeshenasM.NabianM. H. (2023). Comparison of instructor-led and video-based instruction in teaching suturing to medical students. Journal of Surgical Research, 287), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.02.007
41.
NorciniJ.BurchV. (2007). Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE guide No. 31. Medical Teacher, 29(9), 855–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701775453
42.
*OlmsC.JakstatH. A.HaakR. (2016). The implementation of elaborative feedback for qualitative improvement of shade matching—a randomized study. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 28(5), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12231
43.
*OzcakarN.MevsimV.GuldalD.GunvarT.YildirimE.SisliZ.SeminI. (2009). Is the use of videotape recording superior to verbal feedback alone in the teaching of clinical skills?BMC Public Health, 9(1), 474–475. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-474
44.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(1), n71–n79. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
45.
*ParkJ. H.SonJ. Y.KimS.MayW. (2011). Effect of feedback from standardized patients on medical students' performance and perceptions of the neurological examination. Medical Teacher, 33(12), 1005–1010. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.588735
46.
*PavoN.GoliaschG.NierscherF. J.StumpfD.HaugkM.BreckwoldtJ.RuetzlerK.GreifR.FischerH. (2016). Short structured feedback training is equivalent to a mechanical feedback device in two-rescuer bls: A randomised simulation study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 24(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-016-0265-9
47.
*QureshiA. A.ZehraT. (2020). Simulated patient's feedback to improve communication skills of clerkship students. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 15–110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1914-2
48.
*RammellJ.MatthanJ.GrayM.BooklessL. R.NesbittC. I.RodhamP.MossJ.StansbyG.PhillipsA. W. (2018). Asynchronous unsupervised video-enhanced feedback as effective as direct expert feedback in the long-term retention of practical clinical skills: Randomised trial comparing 2 feedback methods in a cohort of novice medical students. Journal of Surgical Education, 75(6), 1463–1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.03.013
49.
RivasS. F.SaizC.OssaC. (2022). Metacognitive strategies and development of critical thinking in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1), 913219–913313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219
50.
*RogersD. A.BoehlerM. L.SchwindC. J.MeierA. H.WallJ. C.BrennerM. J. (2012). Engaging medical students in the feedback process. The American Journal of Surgery, 203(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.009
51.
*RoppoloL. P.HeymannR.PepeP.WagnerJ.CommonsB.MillerR.AllenE.HorneL.WainscottM. P.IdrisA. H. (2011). A randomized controlled trial comparing traditional training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to self-directed CPR learning in first year medical students: The two-person CPR study. Resuscitation, 82(3), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.10.025
52.
*SchülerI. M.Heinrich-WeltzienR.EiseltM. (2018). Effect of individual structured and qualified feedback on improving clinical performance of dental students in clinical courses-randomised controlled study. European Journal of Dental Education, 22(3), e458–e467. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12325
53.
*SheahanG.ReznickR.KlingerD.FlynnL.ZevinB. (2019). Comparison of faculty versus structured peer-feedback for acquisitions of basic and intermediate-level surgical skills. The American Journal of Surgery, 217(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.06.028
*SpenceA. D.DerbyshireS.WalshI. K.MurrayJ. M. (2016). Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students?BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0726-x
56.
*SpickardA.GiganteJ.SteinG.DennyJ. C. (2008). Automatic capture of student notes to augment mentor feedback and student performance on patient write-ups. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(7), 979–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0608-y
57.
TanR.TingJ. J. Q.HongD. Z.LimA. J. S.OngY. T.PisupatiA.ChongE. J. X.ChiamM.LeeA. S. I.TanL. H. S.ChinA. M. C.WijayaL.FongW.KrishnaL. K. R. (2022). Medical student portfolios: A systematic scoping review. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 9(65), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205221076022
58.
TantiphlachivaK.IramaneeratC.LertbunnaphongT. (2023). Improving surgical skills with feedback: Directly-observed versus video-recorded practice. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 660–669. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04635-0
59.
*TejosR.CrovariF.AchurraP.AvilaR.InzunzaM.JarryC.MartinezJ.RiquelmeA.AlseidiA.VarasJ. (2021). Video-based guided simulation without peer or expert feedback is not enough: A randomized controlled trial of simulation-based training for medical students. World Journal of Surgery, 45(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05766-x
60.
TekianA.WatlingC. J.RobertsT. E.SteinertY.NorciniJ. (2017). Qualitative and quantitative feedback in the context of competency-based education. Medical Teacher, 39(12), 1245–1249. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1372564
61.
*ThijssenD. H. J.HopmanM. T. E.van WijngaardenM. T.HoenderopJ. G. J.BindelsR. J. M.EijsvogelsT. M. H. (2019). The impact of feedback during formative testing on study behaviour and performance of (bio)medical students: A randomised controlled study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 97–98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1534-x
62.
TrehanA.Barnett-VanesA.CartyM. J.McCullochP.MaruthappuM. (2015). The impact of feedback of intraoperative technical performance in surgery: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 5(6), 0067599. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006759
63.
TumaF.NassarA. K. (2023). Feedback in medical education. StatPearls Publishing.
64.
Van De RidderJ. M. M.StokkingK. M.McGaghieW. C.Ten CateO. T. J. (2008). What is feedback in clinical education?Medical Education, 42(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02973.x
65.
VelouM. S.AhilaE. (2020). Types of feedback in medical education–a new hypothesis in alignment with competency-based medical education. International Archives of Integrated Medicine, 7(8), 86–90.
66.
WalkowskaA.PrzymuszałaP.Marciniak-StępakP.NowosadkoM.BaumE. (2023). Enhancing cross-cultural competence of medical and healthcare students with the use of simulated patients–a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2505–2524. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032505
67.
*WierinckE.PuttemansV.van SteenbergheD. (2006). Effect of tutorial input in addition to augmented feedback on manual dexterity training and its retention. European Journal of Dental Education, 10(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00392.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
