The Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) and the Fear of Daily Activities Questionnaire (FDAQ) assess fear-avoidance model components. However, the questionnaires are not available in Brazilian Portuguese. This study aimed to translate the original English FACS and FDAQ into Brazilian (Br) Portuguese and assess their measurement properties in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP). One hundred thirty volunteers with CLBP participated in this study. Structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and hypothesis testing for construct validity were analyzed. Results indicated a 2-factor solution for the FACS-Br, while the FDAQ-Br had a one-factor solution. Internal consistency showed acceptable Cronbach’s alpha (alpha >.8). Suitable reliability was found for the FDAQ-Br (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC] = .98). For both FACS-Br factors, suitable reliability was found as well (ICC = .95 and .94). Hypothesis testing for construct validity confirmed more than 75% of the hypotheses proposed a priori for the FACS maladaptive pain/movement-related beliefs domain and the FDAQ-Br. In conclusion, the FACS-Br and FDAQ-Br demonstrated acceptable reliability, internal consistency, and structural validity measurement properties and their correlation (r < .50) suggests that the tools are not interchangeable measures.
AasdahlL.MarchandG. H.GismervikS. Ø.MyhreK.FimlandM. S.RøeC. (2020). The fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) does it really measure fear beliefs?Spine, 45(2), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003188
2.
AbreuA. M.FariaC. D.CardosoS. M.Teixeira-SalmelaL. F. (2008). Versão Brasileira do fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire [the Brazilian version of the fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire]. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 24(3), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2008000300015
3.
BeatonD. E.BombardierC.GuilleminF.FerrazM. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
4.
BollenK. A.StineR. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002004
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos. In Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421
7.
CarregaroR. L.da SilvaE. N.van TulderM. (2019). Direct healthcare costs of spinal disorders in Brazil. International Journal of Public Health, 64(6), 965–974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01211-6
8.
ChaY. J.KimK. (2011). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the fear of daily activities questionnaire for patients with low back pain. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 11(5), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.5.224
CostaL. O.MaherC. G.LatimerJ.FerreiraP. H.FerreiraM. L.PozziG. C.FreitasL. M. (2008). Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: Which one is the best?Spine, 33(22), 2459–2463. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181849dbe
11.
CrombezG.EcclestonC.Van DammeS.VlaeyenJ. W.KarolyP. (2012). Fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: The next generation. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 28(6), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182385392
12.
Cuesta-VargasA. I.NeblettR.GatchelR. J.Roldán-JiménezC. (2020). Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Spanish fear-avoidance components scale and clinical implications in primary care. BMC Family Practice, 21(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01116-x
13.
De BaetsL.SergoorisA.NeblettR.MatheveT.MingelsS.Van GoethemA.HuybrechtsX.CortenK.GeritsD.VandevoortD.TimmermansA.JanssensL. (2023). The development and measurement properties of the Dutch version of the fear-avoidance components scale (FACS-D) in persons with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 23(2), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2022-0046
14.
de LiraM. R.de OliveiraA. S.FrançaR. A.PereiraA. C.GodfreyE. L.ChavesT. C. (2020). The Brazilian Portuguese version of the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS-Br) showed acceptable reliability, validity and responsiveness in chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21(1), 294. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03308-z
15.
DenisonE.ÅsenlöfP.LindbergP. (2004). Self-efficacy, fear avoidance, and pain intensity as predictors of disability in subacute and chronic musculoskeletal pain patients in primary health care. Pain, 111(3), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.07.001
16.
DeyoR. A.DworkinS. F.AmtmannD.AnderssonG.BorensteinD.CarrageeE.CarrinoJ.ChouR.CookK.DeLittoA.GoertzC.KhalsaP.LoeserJ.MackeyS.PanagisJ.RainvilleJ.TostesonT.TurkD.Von KorffM.WeinerD. K. (2015). Report of the NIH task force on research standards for chronic low back pain. International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork, 8(3), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.3822/ijtmb.v8i3.295
17.
DupuisF.CherifA.BatchoC.Massé-AlarieH.RoyJ. S. (2023). The Tampa scale of kinesiophobia: A systematic review of its psychometric properties in people with musculoskeletal pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 39(5), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001104
18.
DurstineJ. L.GordonB.WangZ.LuoX. (2013). Chronic disease and the link to physical activity. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 2(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2012.07.009
19.
ElsmanE. B. M.MokkinkL. B.Langendoen-GortM.RuttersF.BeulensJ.EldersP. J. M.TerweeC. B. (2022). Systematic review on the measurement properties of diabetes-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for measuring physical functioning in people with type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care, 10(3), Article e002729. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002729
20.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E.McHughP. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
21.
GBD 2021 Low Back Pain Collaborators. (2023). Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990–2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: A systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021. The Lancet. Rheumatology, 5(6), e316–e329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00098-X
22.
GeorgeS. Z.StrykerS. E. (2011). Fear-avoidance beliefs and clinical outcomes for patients seeking outpatient physical therapy for musculoskeletal pain conditions. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 41(4), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2011.3488
23.
GeorgeS. Z.ValenciaC.ZeppieriG.Jr.RobinsonM. E. (2009). Development of a self-report measure of fearful activities for patients with low back pain: The fear of daily activities questionnaire. Physical Therapy, 89(9), 969–979. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090032
24.
GheldofE. L.CrombezG.Van den BusscheE.VinckJ.Van NieuwenhuyseA.MoensG.MairiauxP.VlaeyenJ. W. (2010). Pain-related fear predicts disability, but not pain severity: A path analytic approach of the fear-avoidance model. European Journal of Pain, 14(8), 870.e1–870.e8709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2010.01.003
25.
HartvigsenJ.HancockM. J.KongstedA.LouwQ.FerreiraM. L.GenevayS.HoyD.KarppinenJ.PranskyG.SieperJ.SmeetsR. J.UnderwoodM.Lancet Low Back Pain Series Working Group. (2018). What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet (London, England), 391(10137), 2356–2367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X
26.
KamperS. J. (2019). Interpreting outcomes 3-clinical meaningfulness: Linking evidence to practice. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 49(9), 677–678. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2019.0705
27.
KeefeF. J.MainC. J.GeorgeS. Z. (2018). Advancing psychologically informed practice for patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain: Promise, pitfalls, and solutions. Physical Therapy, 98(5), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzy024
28.
KnezevicA.NeblettR.GatchelR. J.Jeremic-KnezevicM.Bugarski-IgnjatovicV.Tomasevic-TodorovicS.BoskovicK.Cuesta-VargasA. I. (2018). Psychometric validation of the Serbian version of the fear avoidance component scale (FACS). PLoS One, 13(9), Article e0204311. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204311
29.
LeeuwM.GoossensM. E.LintonS. J.CrombezG.BoersmaK.VlaeyenJ. W. (2007). The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: Current state of scientific evidence. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-006-9085-0
30.
LethemJ.SladeP. D.TroupJ. D.BentleyG. (1983). Outline of a fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception--I. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 21(4), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(83)90009-8
31.
LinI.WilesL.WallerR.GouckeR.NagreeY.GibberdM.StrakerL.MaherC. G.O’SullivanP. P. B. (2020). What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: Systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099878
32.
LintonS. J.ShawW. S. (2011). Impact of psychological factors in the experience of pain. Physical Therapy, 91(5), 700–711. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100330
33.
LundbergM.Grimby-EkmanA.VerbuntJ.SimmondsM. J. (2011). Pain-related fear: A critical review of the related measures. Pain Research and Treatment, 2011, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/494196
34.
MainC. J.GeorgeS. Z. (2011). Psychologically informed practice for management of low back pain: Future directions in practice and research. Physical Therapy, 91(5), 820–824. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20110060
35.
MardiaK. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334770
MokkinkL. B.de VetH. C. W.PrinsenC. A. C.PatrickD. L.AlonsoJ.BouterL. M.TerweeC. B. (2018). COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 27(5), 1171–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
38.
MutubukiE. N.BeljonY.MaasE. T.HuygenF. J. P. M.OsteloR. W. J. G.van TulderM. W.van DongenJ. M. (2020). The longitudinal relationships between pain severity and disability versus health-related quality of life and costs among chronic low back pain patients. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 29(1), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02302-w
39.
MutubukiE. N.LuitjensM. A.MaasE. T.HuygenF. J. P. M.OsteloR. W. J. G.van TulderM. W.van DongenJ. M. (2020). Predictive factors of high societal costs among chronic low back pain patients. European Journal of Pain, 24(2), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1488
40.
NeblettR.MayerT. G.HartzellM. M.WilliamsM. J.GatchelR. J. (2016). The fear-avoidance components scale (FACS): Development and psychometric evaluation of a new measure of pain-related fear avoidance. Pain Practice: The Official Journal of World Institute of Pain, 16(4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12333
41.
NeblettR.MayerT. G.WilliamsM. J.AsihS.Cuesta-VargasA. I.HartzellM. M.GatchelR. J. (2017). The fear-avoidance components scale (FACS): Responsiveness to functional restoration treatment in a chronic musculoskeletal pain disorder (CMPD) population. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 33(12), 1088–1099. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000501
42.
NevittJ.HancockG. R. (2001). Performance of bootstrapping approaches to model test statistics and parameter standard error estimation in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_2
43.
OrfaleA. G.AraújoP. M.FerrazM. B.NatourJ. (2005). Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research = Revista Brasileira de Pesquisas Médicas e Biológicas, 38(2), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-879x2005000200018
44.
OsteloR. W.DeyoR. A.StratfordP.WaddellG.CroftP.Von KorffM.BouterL. M.de VetH. C. (2008). Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: Towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine, 33(1), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815e3a10
45.
O’SullivanP.CaneiroJ. P.O’KeeffeM.O’SullivanK. (2016). Unraveling the complexity of low back pain. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 46(11), 932–937. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2016.0609
46.
PincusT.SmeetsR. J.SimmondsM. J.SullivanM. J. (2010). The fear avoidance model disentangled: Improving the clinical utility of the fear avoidance model. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 26(9), 739–746. https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181f15d45
47.
PrinsenC. A. C.MokkinkL. B.BouterL. M.AlonsoJ.PatrickD. L.de VetH. C. W.TerweeC. B. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 27(5), 1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
48.
SardaJ.NicholasM. K.PimentaC. A. M.AsghariA. (2007). Pain- related self-efficacy beliefs in a Brazilian chronic pain patient sample: A psychometric analysis. Stress and Health, 23(3), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1135
49.
Schermelleh‐EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MüllerH. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Test of significance and descriptive goodness‐of‐fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74. https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12784
50.
SehnF.ChachamovichE.VidorL. P.Dall-AgnolL.de SouzaI. C.TorresI. L.FregniF.CaumoW. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the pain catastrophizing scale. Pain Medicine, 13(11), 1425–1435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01492.x
51.
SiqueiraF. B.Teixeira-SalmelaL. F.MagalhãesL. d. C. (2007). Análise das propriedades psicométricas da versão brasileira da escala Tampa de cinesiofobia. Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, 15(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-78522007000100004
52.
Sleijser-KoehorstM. L. S.BijkerL.CuijpersP.Scholten-PeetersG. G. M.CoppietersM. W. (2019). Preferred self-administered questionnaires to assess fear of movement, coping, self-efficacy, and catastrophizing in patients with musculoskeletal pain-A modified Delphi study. Pain, 160(3), 600–606. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001441
53.
TuranK.SarıZ.ÖzdenF. (2024). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the fear avoidance components scale in patients with chronic pain related to musculoskeletal disorders. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 136(1-2), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-023-02224-1
54.
van KampenD. A.WillemsW. J.van BeersL. W.CasteleinR. M.ScholtesV. A.TerweeC. B. (2013). Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 8(40), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-8-40
55.
VigattoR.AlexandreN. M.Correa FilhoH. R. (2007). Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry disability index: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity. Spine, 32(4), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000255075.11496.47
WaddellG.NewtonM.HendersonI.SomervilleD.MainC. J. (1993). A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain, 52(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(93)90127-B
58.
WertliM. M.Rasmussen-BarrE.WeiserS.BachmannL. M.BrunnerF. (2014). The role of fear avoidance beliefs as a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with nonspecific low back pain: A systematic review. The Spine Journal: Official Journal of the North American Spine Society, 14(5), 816.e4–836.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.036
59.
WolfE. J.HarringtonK. M.ClarkS. L.MillerM. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
