Computers can empower children with disabilities to participate in the normal processes of spoken and written language learning. To accomplish this, teachers must put access to computer-based speech output and text under the control of children with disabilities. Then, teachers must support children's construction of internal grammars by providing the language structure needed to link the computer-based speech and text with the children's personal meaning systems. A research project with children with Down syndrome is reported, supporting the contention that combining access to speech and text through technology with teaching methods that provide the language structure to link the speech output and text with personal meaning results in significantly improved language use compared with implementation of identical teaching methods with computers without speech output, or identical teaching methods with pencil and paper. Implications about the requirements for effective computer-based language interventions and about the role of teachers are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashton-WarnerS. (1986). Teacher (rev. ed.). Simon & Schuster: New York.
2.
BivloskyJ.ShareJ. (1965). The ITPA and Down's syndrome: An exploratory study. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 70, 78–82.
3.
BloomL. (1991). Language development from two to three. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BrunH. (1986). My words and where I want them. London: Princelet Editions.
5.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6.
BrunerJ. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In SinclairA.JarvellaA.LeveltW.W. (Eds.), The child's conception of language. (pp. 241–256). New York: Springer-Verlag.
7.
ChomskyN. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
8.
CochranP.BullG. (1991). Integrating word processing into language intervention. Topics in Language Disorders, 11(2), 31–49.
9.
FowlerA. (1988). Determinants of rate of language growth. In NadelL. (Ed.) The neurobiology of Down syndrome (Pp. 217–245). Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
10.
FreireP. (1985). Reading the world and reading the word: An interview with Paulo Freire. Language Arts. 62(January), 15–21.
11.
GreenfieldP. (1983). A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In RogoffB.LaveJ. (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12.
IllichI. (1988). Tools for conviviality. Berkeley: Heyday Books.
13.
Kluppel-VetterD. (1991). Needed: Intervention research. In MillerJ. (Ed.), Research on child language disorders: A decade of progress (pp. 243–252). Austin: Pro-Ed.
14.
LennebergE. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
15.
MacnamaraJ. (1972). The cognitive basis of language learning in infants. Psychological Review, 79, 1–13.
16.
MarcellM.ArmstrongV. (1982). Auditory and visual sequential memory of Down Syndrome and nonretarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 87, 86–95.
17.
MeyersL. (1984a). Use of microprocessors to initiate language use in young non-oral children. In PerkinsW. (Ed.), Current therapy of communication disorders: Language handicaps in children, (pp. 43–55) New York: Thieme-Stratton, Inc.
18.
MeyersL. (1984b). Unique contributions of microcomputers to language intervention with handicapped children. In MeyersL. (Guest Ed.), Augmenting language skills with microcomputers, Seminars in Speech and Language, 5(1), 23–34.
19.
MeyersL. (1987). Bypassing the prerequisites: The computer as a language scaffold. Closing the Gap, 5:(6), 1–3.
20.
MeyersL. (1988). Using computers to teach children with Down syndrome spoken and written language skills. In NadelL. (Ed.), The neurobiology of Down syndrome (pp. 247–265). Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
21.
MeyersL. (1989). Language development and intervention. In Van DykeD.LangD.HeideF.van DyneS.SoucekM. (Eds.), Clinical management considerations in Down syndrome (pp. 153–164). New York: Springer-Verlag.
22.
MeyersL. (1990). Technology: A powerful tool for children learning language. OSERS News in Print (U.S. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services), 3:2, 2–7.
23.
MeyersL. (1992a). La macchina di linguaggio: II computer per aiutare i bambini a construire realta e linguaggio (The language machine: Using computers to help children construct reality and language). In PerticariP. (Ed.), Conoscenza come educazione, (pp. 143–169). Milan: FrancoAngeli.
24.
MeyersL. (1992b). Teach me my language: Teaching children with learning disabilities to link meaning with speech and text. The Writing Notebook: Creative Word Processing in the Classroom. May, 44–46.
25.
MeyersL.LanskyP. (1991). Dancing cheek to cheek: Nurturing beginning social, play and language interactions. Los Angeles: Blind Childrens Center.
26.
MillerJ. (1981). Assessing language production in children. Baltimore: University Park Press.
27.
MillerJ. (1987). Language and communication characteristics of children with Down syndrome. In PeuschelS.TingeyC.RyndersJ.CrockerA.CrutcherD. (Eds.), New perspectives on Down syndrome (pp. 233–262). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.
28.
MillerJ. (1988). The developmental asynchrony of language development in children with Down syndrome. In NadelL. (Ed.), The neurobiology of Down Syndrome (pp. 167–198). Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
29.
PeuschelS. (1988). Visual and auditory processing. In NadelL. (Ed.), The neurobiology of Down syndrome (pp. 199–216). Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
30.
PrizantB. (1987). Toward an understanding of verbal repetition in the language of visually impaired children. Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders, 15, 79–90.
31.
SmithF. (1986). Insult to intelligence: The bureaucratic invasion of our classrooms. New York: Arbor House.
32.
StarkR.TallalP. (1988). Language, speech and reading disorders in children: Neuropsychological Studies. Austin: Pro-Ed.
33.
StratfordB. (1980). Preferences in attention to visual cues in Down syndrome and normal children. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 24, 57–64.
34.
TallalP. (1991). Back to the future: Research on developmental disorders of language. In MillerJ. (Ed.) Research on child language disorders: A decade of progress (pp. 399–407). Austin: Pro-Ed.
35.
Von GlasersfeldE. (1987). Learning as constructive activity. In Von GlasersfeldE. (Ed.), The construction of knowledge (pp. 307–331). Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications.
36.
WeisskopfV. (1985). The real window of vulnerability. Outlook, 56, 25–30.
