The use of computer-based technology in teaching reading with students with disabilities is outlined in this article. Research from the last 10 years is presented and discussed using the metaphors of Tutor, Tool, and Agent as categories of instructional purpose. Although the new multimedia technologies now dominate much of the discussion and investigation concerning technology and reading instruction, drill and practice and tutorial computer assisted instructional programs are the most thoroughly researched area of computer use in reading and provide most of the substantive data that is supportive of computer use for students in special education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalajthyE. (1988). An investigation of learner-control variables in vocabulary learning using traditional instruction and two forms of computer-based instruction. Reading Research and Instruction, 27 (4), 15–24.
2.
BooneR.HigginsK. (in press). Hypermedia basal readers: Three years of school-based research. Journal of Special Education Technology.
3.
CasteelC. A. (1989). Effects of chunked reading among learning disabled students: An experimental comparison of computer and traditional chunked passages. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 17 (2), 115–121.
4.
DeckerB. C. (1991). Early literacy instruction with computers and whole language: An evaluation of the Writing-to-Read computer program with disadvantaged minority children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 335 635).
5.
FarmerM. E.KleinR.BrysonS. E. (1992). Computer-assisted reading: Effects of whole-word feedback on fluency and comprehension in readers with severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 13 (2), 50–60.
6.
GayG. (1986). Interaction of learner control and prior understanding in computer-assisted video instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78 (3), 225–227.
7.
GerstenR.CarnineD.WoodwardJ. (1987). Direct instruction research: The third decade. Remedial and Special Education, 8 (6), 48–56.
8.
GillinghamM. G.GarnerR.GuthrieJ. T.SawyerR. (1989). Children's control of computer-based reading assistance in answering synthesis questions. Computers in Human Behavior, 5, 61–75.
9.
GoldmanS. R.PellegrinoJ. W. (1987). Information processing and educational microcomputer technology: Where do we go from here?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20 (3), 144–154.
10.
GreeneE. (1988). Effects of new computer technology on increases in children's word recognition automaticity. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 295 643).
11.
GrockeM. (1983). Computers in the classroom: How can they teach reading?Australian journal of Reading, 6 (4), 175–185.
12.
HasselbringT. S.GoinL. I.WissickC. (1989). Making knowledge meaningful: Applications of hypermedia. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10 (2), 61–72.
13.
HeynM. (1992). Using a Hypermedia Encyclopedia with Third Graders. In BooneR.HigginsK. (Eds.), TAM Topical Guide #1; Multimedia. Nashville: Technology and Media Division, Council for Exceptional Children.
14.
HigginsK. (1988). Hypertext computer assisted instruction and the social studies achievement of learning disabled, remedial, and regular education students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
15.
HigginsK.BooneR. (1990). Hypertext computer study guides and the social studies achievement of students with learning disabilities, remedial students, and regular education students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23 (9), 529–540.
16.
HigginsK.BooneR. (1991). Hypermedia CAI: A supplement to an elementary school basal reader program. Journal of Special Education Technology, 11 (1), 1–15.
17.
HigginsK.BooneR. (1992). Hypermedia computer study guides for social studies: Adapting a Canadian history text. Social Education, 56 (3), 168–173.
18.
JohnsonG.GerstenR.CarnineD. (1987). Effects of instructional design variables on vocabulary acquisition of LD Students: A study of computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20 (4), 206–213.
19.
JonesK. M.TorgesenJ. K.SextonM. A. (1987). Using computer guided practice to Increase decoding fluency in learning disabled children: A study using the Hint and Hunt I program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20 (2), 122–128.
20.
KeeneS.DaveyB. (1987). Effects of computer-presented text on LD adolescents' reading behaviors. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 283–290.
21.
LinA.PodellD. M.ReinN. (1991). The effects of CAI on word recognition in mildly mentally handicapped and nonhandicapped learners. Journal of Special Education Technology, 11 (1), 16–25.
22.
MacArthurC. A.HaynesJ. (1991). The student assistant for learning from text (SALT): A hypermedia reading aide. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children Technology and Media Annual Conference, January 1992, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
23.
MajsterekD. (1984). WORDS: A microcomputer program for teaching and testing students' sight word vocabulary. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 265 842).
24.
MarriottM. (1990, September 12). Videodisk joining the book as a new tool in the classroom. The New York Times, p. 1.
25.
MartinJ. H.FriedbergA. (1986). Writing to read. [Computer program]. New York: Warner.
26.
McCarthyR. (1989). Multimedia: What the excitement's all about. Electronic Learning, June, pp. 26–31.
27.
McConkieG. W.ZolaD. (1987). Two examples of computer-based research on reading: Eye movement monitoring and computer-aided reading. In ReinkingD. (ed.), Reading and computers issues for theory and practice (pp. 97–107). New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
McGregorG.DrossnerD.AxelrodA. (1990). Increasing instructional efficiency: A comparison of voice plus text vs. text alone on the error rate of students with mild disabilities during CAI. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10 (4), 192–197.
29.
NiemiecR. P.WalbergH. J. (1985). Computers and achievement in the elementary schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1 (4), 435–440.
30.
OlsonR.FoltzG.WiseB. (1986). Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18 (2), 93–99.
31.
PapertS. (1980). Mindstorms. New York, NY: Basic Books.
32.
PorterB. (1990, May 9). Texas students get the picture with videodisk curriculum. Dallas Times Herald, pp. E1, E7.
33.
ReinkingD. (1988). Computer-mediated text and comprehension differences: The role of reading time, reader preference, and estimation of learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 23 (4), 484–498.
34.
ReinkingD.SchreinerR. (1985). The effects of computer-mediated text on measures of reading comprehension and reading behavior. Reading Research Quarterly, 20 (5), 536–551.
35.
RoblyerM. D.KingF. J. (1983). Reasonable expectations for computer-based instruction in basic reading skills. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, New Orleans, Louisiana.
36.
RothS. F.BeckI. L. (1987). Theoretical and instructional implications of the assessment of two microcomputer word recognition programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 22 (2), 197–218.
37.
SugarmanP.GivotovskyN.ReeveV.RiversA. (1990). Review of the twelfth conference on interactive videodisc in education and training. The Videodisc Monitor, 8 (10), 18–23.
38.
SalvinR. E. (1991). Reading effects of IBM's “Writing to Read” program: A review of evaluations. Educational evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13 (1), 1–11.
39.
TobiasS. (1987). Mandatory text review and interaction with student characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79 (2), 154–161.
40.
TorgesenJ. K.YoungK. A. (1983). Priorities for the use of microcomputers with learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16 (4), 234–237.
41.
TorgesenJ. K.WatersM. D.CohenA. L.TorgesenJ. L. (1988). Improving sight-word recognition skills in LD children: An evaluation of three computer program variations. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 11, 125–132.
42.
WeberW. R.HendersonE. H. (1989). A computer-based program of word study: Effects on reading and spelling. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 10, 157–171.
43.
WoodwardJ.CarnineD.GerstenR.GleasonM.JohnsonG.CollinsM. (1986). Applying instructional design principles to CAI for mildly handicapped students: Four recently conducted studies. Journal of Special Education Technology, 8 (1), 13–26.
