This article explains the usefulness of PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) in streamlining the currently cumbersome exceptional student referral process. With PERT, realistic time and personnel needs can be established so that the referral process can be completed within reasonable time limits. In addition, the status of every referral can be known at all times.
A sample work breakdown structure for referrals is developed as the initial step in PERT. With this step, the process is broken down into small manageable units. Based on this, a network is developed. The network shows the interrelationships and priorities of the steps needed to complete the referral process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CookD.Program evaluation and review technique: Applications in education. Washington, University Press of America1979.
2.
Education for the Handicapped Law Review, Case No. 10798, 3EHLR 503:258, 1982a.
3.
Education for the Handicapped Law Review, Capistrano Unified School District, 3EHLR 255:21, 1982b.
4.
Education for the Handicapped Law Review, Ukiah Unified School District, 3EHLR 255:178, 1982c.
5.
Education for the Handicapped Law Review, Case No. 82–28, 3EHLR 504:191, 1982d.
6.
Education for the Handicapped Law Review, Case No. 82–34, 3EHLR 504:185, 1982e.
7.
Education for the Handicapped Law Review. Case No. 82111, 3EHLR 82–250, 3EHLR 504:174, 1982f.
8.
Education for the Handicapped Law Review, Case No. 10988, 3EHLR 504:272, 1983.
9.
Federal Electric Corporation.A programmed introduction to PERT: Program Evaluation and Review Technique. New York: Wiley Interscience, 1963.
10.
MaherC. A.Time management training for providers of special services. Exceptional Children, 1982, 48, 523–528.
11.
McMahonH.CampbellJ.MorrisseyM. J.PERTing your office: Is it possible and/or practical?College and University, 1981, 56, 355.
12.
Milestone. Livermore, CA: Organic Software, 1980.
13.
SchiffmanG.TobinD.Cassidy-BronsonS.Computers in the schools. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982, 15, 422–425.
