This study employs an exploratory netnographic research approach to explore how educators in K-12 and higher education settings publicly engage with artificial intelligence (AI) on TikTok as a professional learning network, with an emphasis on supporting students with disabilities. Using deidentified, publicly accessible video data, 209 videos were qualitatively coded, and statistical analysis of thematic coding frequencies identified five overarching themes. These included: (1) AI as a Pedagogical and Productivity Tool for Educators, (2) AI for Personalization, Inclusion, Access, and Student Support, (3) AI Literacy, Ethics, and Societal Implications, (4) AI in the Workforce and Skill Development, and (5) AI Tool Demonstrations. The findings explore ways in which educators and students, especially those in secondary and higher education environments, are using TikTok as an informal professional learning network where AI tools, ethical considerations, and inclusive practices are shared and debated, contributing to emerging scholarship at the intersection of AI, special education, and digital educator culture. These insights and findings aim to better understand how educators and students develop shared knowledge in AI in algorithmically mediated public spaces.
Al-ZahraniA. M.AlasmariT. M. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: The dynamics of ethical, social, and educational implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4
BaileyM. (2018). The performance of politics in social media. Routledge.
5.
CarpenterJ. P.HarveyS. (2019). “There’s no referee on social media”: Challenges in educator professional social media use. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, Article 102904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102904
6.
CarpenterJ. P.SheltonC. C.SchroederS. E. (2023). The education influencer: A new player in the educator professional landscape. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 55(5), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2030267
7.
ChenX.XieH.ZouD.HwangG.-J. (2020). Application and theory gaps during the rise of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, Article 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100002
8.
CostelloL.McDermottM.-L.WallaceR. (2017). Netnography: Range of practices, misperceptions, and missed opportunities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917700647
9.
GreenhowC.AskariE. (2017). Learning and teaching with social network sites: A decade of research in K-12 related education. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 623–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9446-9
KangH.LouC. (2022). AI agency vs. human agency: Understanding human-AI interactions on TikTok and their implications for user engagement. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(5), Article zmac014. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac014
14.
KeskinB. (2018). Van Dijk, Poell, and de Wall, The Platform Society: Public values in a connectiveworldGlobalization & Development Review (2018). Markets,. 3(3). https://doi.org/10.23860/MGDR-2018-03-03-08
15.
KozinetsR. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage.
16.
KozinetsR. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. Sage.
17.
KozinetsR. V. (2019). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
18.
KozinetsR. V. (2020). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research.
KozinetsR.GretzelU. (2024). Netnography evolved: New contexts, scope, procedures and sensibilities. Annals of Tourism Research, 104, Article 103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103693
21.
Kulavuz-OnalD. (2015). Using netnography to explore the culture of online language teaching communities. CALICO Journal, 32(3), 426–448. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i3.26636
22.
LandersR. N.SchmidtG. B. (2016). Social media in employee selection and recruitment: Theory, practice, and current challenges. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29989-1
23.
LazerD. M. J.BaumM. A.BenklerY.BerinskyA. J.GreenhillK. M.MenczerF.MetzgerM. J.NyhanB.PennycookG.RothschildD.SchudsonM.SlomanS. A.SunsteinC. R.ThorsonE. A.WattsD. J.ZittrainJ. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
24.
LeeA. Y.EllisonN. B.HancockJ. T. (2023). To use or be used? The role of agency in social media use and well-being. Frontiers in Computer Science, 5, Article 1123323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2023.1123323
25.
LiuY.BakiciT. (2019). Enterprise social media usage: The motives and the moderating role of public social media experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.029
MardianaH. (2016). Social media and implications for education: Case study in the Faculty of Technology and Science, Universitas Buddhi Dharma, Tangerang, Indonesia (Online submission). Sains Terapan dan Teknologi FST Buddhi Dharma, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/cp8ah
McKoyS. L. (2023). A phenomenographic analysis of elementary student teachers’ reflections using TikTok as a resource for classroom management (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/4861/
30.
McKoyS. L.JordanL. S. (2022). Netnography as a method for studying online cultures. In CloverD. E.SanfordK.AllenW. S. (Eds.), Academic project designs and methods (pp. 143–148). University of Victoria. https://doi.org/10.57945/manara.24137463.v1
31.
MercadoF. M. S.ShinS. (2025). K-12 teachers’ professional development and learning on social media: A systematic literature review. Information and Learning Sciences, 126(3-4), 214–244. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-12-2023-0198
32.
MoraisG.SantosV.GonçalvesC. (2020). Netnography: Origins, foundations, evolution and axiological and methodological developments and trends. The Qualitative Report, 25(2), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4227
33.
NaatzA. J.RupparA. (2025). Special education teachers’ use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): An Exploratory Survey of frequency and factors influencing adoption. Journal of Special Education Technology, 41(2), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434251379800
34.
NortvigA. M.PetersenA. K.BalleS. H. (2018). A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction, and engagement. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 16(1), 46–55. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1175336.
35.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372(71), Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
36.
PekkalaK.Van ZoonenW. (2022). Work-related social media use: The mediating role of social media communication self-efficacy. European Management Journal, 40(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.03.004
37.
PreeceA. (2024). Educator perceptions of appropriate social media practices. Theses, Dissertations and Capstones, 1853. https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/1853
38.
PrimackB. A. (2021). You are what you click: How being selective, positive, and creative can transform your social media experience. Chronicle Books.
39.
PriorD. D.MillerL. M. (2012). Webethnography: Towards a typology for quality in research design. International Journal of Market Research, 54(4), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.2501/ijmr-54-4-503-520
40.
SawyerA. G.DredgerK.MyersJ.BarnesS.WilsonR.SullivanJ.SawyerD. (2020). Developing teachers as critical curators: Investigating elementary preservice teachers’ inspirations for lesson planning. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(5), 518–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119879894
41.
SchreursL.MeierA.VandenboschL. (2022). Exposure to the positivity bias and adolescents’ differential longitudinal links with social comparison, inspiration, and envy depending on social media literacy. Current Psychology, 42, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03893-3
42.
SchreursL.VandenboschL. (2021). Introducing the Social Media Literacy (SMILE) model with the case of the positivity bias on social media. Journal of Children and Media, 15(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1809481
SherryJ. F. Jr.KozinetsR. V. (2001). Qualitative inquiry in marketing and consumer research. In IacobucciDawn (Ed.), Kellogg on Marketing (pp. 94–165). New York: Wiley Books.
45.
Staudt WilletK. B. (2024). Early-career teachers’ expansion of professional learning networks through social media. Professional Development in Education, 50(2), 386–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2178481
46.
SunL.ZhouK.LiL.CheungW. M.LinC.-H. (2025). From teachers to influencers: Exploring edu-influencers’ social media practices through uses and gratification theory. System, 133, Article 103774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103774
TrustT.KrutkaD. G.CarpenterJ. P. (2016). Together we are better: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102(102), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
51.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2023, May). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. U.S. Department of Education.
52.
Van DijckJ. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
53.
WallaceR.CostelloL.DevineA. (2018). Netnographic slog: Creative elicitation strategies to encourage participation in an online community of practice for early education and care. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918797796
54.
Xie-CarsonL.BenckendorffP.HughesK. (2023). Not so different after all? A netnographic exploration of user engagement with non-human influencers on social media. Journal of Business Research, 167, Article 114149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114149
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
