As co-teachers tackle the unique challenges of instructing in remote, hybrid, and socially distanced brick-and-mortar settings they can increase their success by incorporating technology solutions into their shared classrooms. Technology can facilitate co-teachers’ implementation of small-group instruction, increase options for student engagement and participation, and establish instructional consistency through clear communication. The result can be enhanced student learning and more efficient and effective delivery of the specially designed instruction that students with disabilities must receive.
AyçiçekB.Yanpar YelkenT. (2018). The effect of flipped classroom model on students’ classroom engagement in teaching English. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 385–398. https://search.ebscohost.com
2.
CookS. C.McDuffie-LandrumK. (2020). Integrating effective practices into co-teaching: Increasing outcomes for students with disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 55(4), 221–229.
FriendM. (2015). Welcome to co-teaching 2.0. Educational Leadership, 73(4), 16–22.
5.
FriendM. (2019). Co-teach: Building and sustaining effective classroom partnerships in inclusive schools (3rd ed.). Marilyn Friend.
6.
HewardW. L.CoursonF. H.NarayanJ. S. (1989). Using choral responding to increase active student response. Teaching Exceptional Children, 21(3), 72–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005998902100321
7.
HollingsheadA.WilliamsonP.CarnahanC. (2018). Cognitive and emotional engagement for students with severe intellectual disability defined by the scholars with expertise in the field. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 43(4), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918812803
8.
LehaneP.SeniorJ. (2020). Collaborative teaching: Exploring the impact of co-teaching practices on the numeracy attainment of pupils with and without special educational needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(3), 303–317.
9.
McDougalJ. L.GraneyS. B.WrightJ. A.ArdoinS. P. (2009). RTI in practice: A practical guide to implementing effective evidence-based interventions in your school. John Wiley & Sons.
10.
NagroS. A.HooksS. D.FraserD. W.CorneliusK. E. (2018). Whole-group response strategies to promote student engagement in inclusive classrooms. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(4), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916640749
11.
ReaP. J.McLaughlinV. L.Walther-ThomasC. (2001). Outcomes for students with learning disabilities in inclusive and pullout programs. Exceptional Children, 68(2), 203–222.
12.
SinclairA. C.BrayL. E.WeiY.ClancyE. E.WexlerJ.KearnsD. M.LemonsC. J. (2018). Coteaching in content area classrooms: Lessons and guiding questions for administrators. NASSP Bulletin, 102, 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636518812701
13.
SkinnerC. H.TurcoT. L.BeattyK. L.RasavageC. (1989). Cover, copy, and compare: A method for increasing multiplication performance. School Psychology Review, 18(3), 412–420.
14.
TremblayP. (2013). Comparative outcomes of two instructional models for students with learning disabilities: Inclusion with co-teaching and solo-taught special education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 13(4), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2012.01270.x
15.
WalshJ. M. (2012). Co-teaching as a school system strategy for continuous improvement. Preventing School Failure, 56(1), 29–36.
16.
Walther-ThomasC. S. (1997). Co-teaching experiences: The benefits and problems that teachers and principals report over time. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(4), 395–407.
17.
WangZ.BerginC.BerginD. A. (2014). Measuring engagement in fourth to twelfth grade classrooms: The classroom engagement inventory. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(4), 517–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq000005
18.
WexlerJ.KearnsD. M.LemonsC. J.MitchellM.ClancyE.DavidsonK.SinclairA. C.WeiY. (2018). Reading comprehension and co-teaching practices in middle school English language arts classrooms. Exceptional Children, 84, 384–402.
