Computer-assisted instruction (CAI) gives students with visual impairment (VI) immediate access to information and enables direct collaboration with sighted educators and peers. This systematic review examined interventions addressing the impact of CAI interventions on school-age children with VI. Twenty-eight studies examined CAI interventions implemented with 339 students with VI. The CAI interventions fell into five categories: digital texts, word processors, haptic simulations, educational platforms, and serious games. Findings from this review highlight the need for: (a) addressing students’ preparation or mastery for technology skills needed to participate in CAI; (b) more diverse recruitment of participants with VI; and (c) incorporating educators as implementers of CAI. Implications for practice and research are also addressed.
AbnerG. H.LahmE. A. (2002). Implementation of assistive technology with students who are visually impaired: Teachers’ readiness. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(2), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0209600204
2.
American Printing House for the Blind. (2019). Annual report (Fiscal Year 2019). APH Press.
3.
*ArslantasT. K.YildirimS.ArslantekinB. A. (2019). Educational affordances of a specific web-based assistive technology for students with visual impairment. Interactive Learning Environments27(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619587
4.
ArthanatS.ElsaesserL. J.BauerS. (2017). A survey of assistive technology service providers in the USA. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(8), 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2016.1265015
5.
BarragaN. C.ErinJ. N. (2001). Visual impairment and learning (4th ed.). Pro-ed.: Austin, TX.
6.
*BealC. R.RosenblumL. P. (2018). Evaluation of the effectiveness of a tablet computer application (App) in helping students with visual impairments solve mathematics problems. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1811200102
7.
*BealC. R.RosenblumL. P.SmithD. W. (2011). A pilot study of a self-voicing computer program for prealgebra math problems. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(3), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1110500310
8.
*BealC. R.ShawE. (2009). An online math problem solving system for middle school students who are blind. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 630–638.
9.
*BeeversR.HallinanP. (1990). Talking word processors and text editing for visually impaired children: A pilot case study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 84(10), 552–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X9008401018
10.
*BickfordJ. O.FalcoR. A. (2012). Technology for early braille literacy: Comparison of traditional braille instruction and instruction with an electronic notetaker. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 106(10), 679–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1210601012
11.
BouckE. C.FlanaganS.JoshiG. S.SheikhW.SchleppenbachD. (2011). Speaking math—A voice input, speech output calculator for students with visual impairments. Journal of Special Education Technology, 26(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341102600401
12.
*BouckE. C.MeyerN. K.JoshiG. S.SchleppenbachD. (2013). Accessing algebra via MathSpeak™: Understanding the potential and pitfalls for students with visual impairments. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341302800105
13.
*BouckE. C.WengP. L. (2014a). Reading math: A comparison of reading and listening to algebraic problems. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341402900401
14.
*BouckE. C.WengP. L. (2014b). Hearing math: Algebra supported eText for students with visual impairments. Assistive Technology, 26(3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2013.870939
15.
*BouckE. C.WengP. L.SatsangiR. (2016). Digital versus traditional: Secondary students with visual impairments’ perceptions of a digital algebra textbook. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 110(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1611000105
16.
BrownC. M.PackerT. L.PassmoreA. (2013). Adequacy of the regular early education classroom environment for students with visual impairment. The Journal of Special Education, 46(4), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466910397374
17.
CampbellP. H.MilbourneS.DuganL. M.WilcoxM. J. (2006). A review of evidence on practices for teaching young children to use assistive technology devices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214060260010101
18.
ChengP. H. (2016). Wearable ultrasonic guiding device with white cane for the visually impaired: A preliminary verisimilitude experiment. Assistive Technology, 28(3), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2015.1123781
19.
*CooperH. L.NicholsS. K. (2007). Technology and early braille literacy: Using the Mountbatten Pro Brailler in primary-grade classrooms. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 101(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0710100104
20.
CornA. L.KoenigA. J. (2002). Literacy for students with low vision: A framework for delivering instruction. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 96(5), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0209600503
21.
EricksonW.LeeC.von SchraderS. (2017). Disability statistics from the American Community Survey (ACS). Cornell University Yang-Tan Institute.
22.
*FarnsworthC. R.LucknerJ. L. (2008). The impact of assistive technology on curriculum accommodation for a Braille-reading student. RE:view, 39(4), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.3200/REVU.39.4.171-187
23.
FedericiS.BorsciS. (2016). Providing assistive technology in Italy: the perceived delivery process quality as affecting abandonment. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 11(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2014.930191
*FrankelL.BrownsteinB.SoifferN. (2017). Expanding audio access to mathematics expressions by students with visual impairments via MathML. ETS Research Report Series, 2017(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12132
26.
*HahnM. E.MuellerC. M.GorlewiczJ. L. (2019). The comprehension of STEM graphics via a multisensory tablet electronic device by students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 113(5), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X19876463
27.
*JonesM. G.ChildersG.EmigB.ChevrierJ.TanH.StevensV.ListJ. (2014). The efficacy of haptic simulations to teach students with visual impairments about temperature and pressure. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 108(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1410800106
28.
*Kamei-HannanC.LawsonH. (2012). Impact of a braille-note on writing: Evaluating the process, quality, and attitudes of three students who are visually impaired. Journal of Special Education Technology, 27(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341202700301
29.
*Kamei-HannanC.McCarthyT.D’AndreaF. M.HolbrookM. C. (2020). Investigating the efficacy of Reading Adventure Time! For improving reading skills in children with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 114(2), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X20913128
30.
Kamei-HannanC.TuttleM.SongkhoaR. (2022). A conceptual framework for digital competence of students with visual impairment and blindness.Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness[in press].
31.
*KappermanG.StickenJ.SmithT. (2011). The effectiveness of the Nemeth Code tutorial for the BrailleNote. Insight: Research and Practice in Visual Impairment and Blindness, 4(1), 22-28.
32.
*KappermanG.StickenJ.SmithT. (2012). The effectiveness of the nemeth code tutorial for the braillenote: A follow-up study. Insight: Research and Practice in Visual Impairment and Blindness, 5(4), 168–174.
33.
*LandauS.RussellM.GourgeyK.ErinJ. N.CowanJ. (2003). Use of the talking tactile tablet in mathematics testing. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0309700204
34.
*McCarthyT.RosenblumL. P.JohnsonB. G.DittelJ.KearnsD. M. (2016). An artificial intelligence tutor: A supplementary tool for teaching and practicing braille. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 110(5), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1611000503
35.
McDonnallM. C.CruddenA. (2009). Factors affecting the successful employment of transition-age youths with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(6), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0910300603
36.
*McLaughlinR.Kamei-HannanC. (2018). Paper or digital text: Which reading medium is best for students with visual impairments?Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(4), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1811200401
37.
*MioduserD.Tur‐KaspaH.LeitnerI. (2000). The learning value of computer‐based instruction of early reading skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00115.x
38.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G.Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PloS Med, 6(7), (b2535). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
39.
OdomS. L.ThompsonJ. L.HedgesS.BoydB. A.DykstraJ. R.DudaM. A.SzidonK. L.BordA.SmithL. E.(2015). Technology-aided interventions and instruction for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 3805–3819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2320-6
40.
*RadeckiA.BujaczM.SkulimowskiP.StrumiłłoP. (2020). Interactive sonification of images in serious games as an education aid for visually impaired children. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12852
41.
RootJ. R.StevensonB. S.DavisL. L.Geddes-HallJ.TestD. W. (2017). Establishing computer-assisted instruction to teach academics to students with autism as an evidence-based practice. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2947-6
42.
*RoviraK.GapenneO. (2009). Tactile classification of traditional and computerized media in three adolescents who are blind. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103(7), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0910300707
43.
*SánchezJ.ElíasM. (2007). Science learning by blind children through audio-based interactive software. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine, 5, 184–190.
44.
*SánchezJ.FloresH. (2005). Training blind children to develop mathematics skills through audio. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(4), 354–355.
45.
*SanfordL. (1984). A formative evaluation of an instructional program designed to teach visually impaired students to use microcomputers. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 15(4), 136–144.
46.
ScaddenL. A. (2000). Technology and society. In SilverstoneB.LangM. A.RosenthalB. P.FayeE. E. (Eds.), The Lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation: Vol. II. Vision rehabilitation (pp. 907–919). Oxford University Press.
47.
ShadishW. R.ZelinskyN. A.VeveaJ. L.KratochwillT. R. (2016). A survey of publication practices of single‐case design researchers when treatments have small or large effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(3), 656–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.308
VarmaR.Ying-LaiM.KleinR.AzenS. P.& Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group. (2004). Prevalence and risk indicators of visual impairment and blindness in Latinos: The Los Angeles Latino eye study. Ophthalmology, 111(6), 1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.02.002
50.
WolffeK. E. (2017). Growth and development in middle childhood and adolescence. In Kamei-HannanC.HolbrookM. C.McCarthyT. (2017). Foundations of education. Volume I: History and theory of teaching children and youths with visual impairments (pp.146–184), APH Press.
