We used an adapted alternating treatment single-case design to compare the effect of affirmative feedback to affirmative plus suggestive feedback on educators’ use of naturalistic instruction. Three early childhood special educators and a focus child within their preschool classrooms participated. Visual analysis of our data suggest that affirmative plus suggestive feedback produced stronger effects compared to affirmative feedback. Based on these data, faculty and professional development providers should plan to provide their educators with both affirmative and suggestive feedback to strengthen educators’ practice. Implications for practice and research are included.
Artman-MeekerK. M.HemmeterM. L. (2013). Effects of training and feedback on teachers’ use of classroom preventive practices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121412447115
2.
Artman-MeekerK. M.HemmeterM. L.SnyderP. (2014). Effects of distance coaching on teachers’ use of pyramid model practices: A pilot study. Infants & Young Children, 27(4), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000016
3.
BartonE. E.FullerE. A.SchnitzA. (2016). The use of emailto coach preservice early childhood teachers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 36(2), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415612728
4.
BartonE. E.PokorskiE. A.GossettS.SweeneyE.QiuJ.ChoiG. (2018). The use of email to coach early childhood teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 40(3), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815118760314
5.
BartonE. E.RigorM. N.PokorskiE. A.VelezM.DomingoM. (2019). Using text messaging to deliver performance feedback to preservice early childhood teachers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 39(2), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121418800016
6.
BartonE. E.WoleryM. (2007). Evaluation of e-mail feedback on the verbal behaviors of pre-service teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 30(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510703000105
7.
CoogleC. G.NagroS.ReganK.O’BrienK. M.OttleyJ. R. (2019). The impact of real-time feedback and video analysis on early childhood teachers’ practice. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121419857142
8.
CoogleC. G.OttleyJ. R.StorieS.RahnN. L.Kurowski-BurtA. (2018). Performance-based feedback to enhance preservice teachers’ practice and preschool children’s expressive communication. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118803583
9.
CoogleC. G.RahnN. L.OttleyJ. R. (2015). Pre-service teacher use of communication strategies upon receiving immediate feedback. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.03.003
10.
CoogleC. G.StorieS.OttleyJ. R.RahnN. L.Kurowski-BurtA. (2019). Technology-enhanced performance-based feedback to support teacher practice and child outcomes. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121419838624
ForestE. J.HornerR. H.Lewis-PalmerT.ToddA. W. (2004). Transitions for young children with autism from preschool to kindergarten. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007040060020501
13.
Grisham-BrownJ.HemmeterJ. W.Pretti-FrontczakK. L. (2005). Blended practices for teaching young children in inclusive settings. Brookes.
14.
HartJ. E.WhalonK. (2013). Misbehavior or missed opportunity? Challenges in interpreting the behavior of young children with autism spectrum disorder. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0527-8
15.
HemmeterM. L.SnyderP.KinderK.ArtmanK. (2011). Impact of performance feedback delivered via electronic mail on preschool teachers’ use of descriptive praise. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.05.004
16.
HoganT. P.CainK.BridgesM. S. (2012). Young children’s oral language abilities and later reading comprehension. In ShanahanT.LoniganC. J. (Eds.), Early childhood literacy: The national early literacy panel and beyond (pp. 45–70). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
17.
KampsD.Thiemann-BourqueK.Heitzman-PowellL.SchwartzI.RosenbergN.MasonR.CoxS. (2015). A comprehensive peer network intervention to improve social communication of children with autism spectrum disorders: A randomized trial in kindergarten and first grade. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1809–1824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2340-2
18.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794
19.
LaneJ. D.ShepleyC.Lieberman-BetzR. (2016). Promoting expressive language in young children with or at-risk for autism spectrum disorder in a preschool classroom. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 3216–3231. http://dx.doi.org.mutex.gmu.edu/10.1007/s10803-016-2856-8
20.
McLeodR. H.KimS.ResuaK. A. (2019). The effects of coaching with video and email feedback on preservice teachers’ use of recommended practices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 38(4), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121418763531
National Professional Development Center on Inclusion. (2008). What do we mean by professional development in the early childhood field?The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute. https://npdci.fpg.unc.edu
23.
NohJ.AllenD.SquiresJ. (2009). Use of embedded learning opportunities within daily routines by early intervention/early childhood special education teachers. International Journal of Special Education, 24(2), 1–10.
24.
PaulR.RothF. P. (2011). Characterizing and predicting outcomes of communication delays in infants and toddlers: Implications for clinical practice. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(3), 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-03602009/08-0083
25.
Pretti-FrontczakK.BrickerD. (2001). Use of the embedding strategy during daily activities by early childhood education and early childhood special education teachers. Infant-Toddler Intervention: The Transdisciplinary Journal, 11, 111–128. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ629406
26.
RahnN. L.CoogleC. G.OttleyJ. R. (2019). Early childhood special education teachers’ use of embedded learning opportunities within classroom routines and activities. Infants and Young Children, 32(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000132
27.
RakapS.Parlak-RakapA. (2011). Effectiveness of embedded instruction in early childhood special education: A literature review. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000132
RockM. L.GreggM.GableR. A.ZigmondN. P. (2009). Virtual coaching for novice teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 91, 36–41.
30.
RomanoM.WoodsJ. (2018). Collaborative coaching with early head start teachers using responsive communication strategies. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 38(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121417696276
31.
ScheelerM. C.MoranoS.LeeD. L. (2018). Effects of immediate feedback using bug-in-ear with paraeducators working with students with autism. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416666645
32.
ScheelerM. C.RuhlK. L.McAfeeJ. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(4), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640402700407
33.
SnyderP.HemmeterM. L.McLaughlinT. (2011). Professional development in early childhood intervention: Where we stand on the silver anniversary of PL 99-457. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111428336
34.
SnyderP.HemmeterM. L.McLeanM.SandallS.McLaughlinT.AlginaJ. (2018). Effects of professional development on preschool teachers’ use of embedded instruction practices. Exceptional Children, 84(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917735512
35.
SnyderP. A.HemmeterM. L.FoxL. (2015). Supporting implementation of evidence-based practices through practice-based coaching. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(3), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415594925
36.
SnyderP. A.RakapS.HemmeterM. L.McLaughlinT. W.SandallS.McLeanM. E. (2015). Naturalistic instructional approaches in early learning: A systematic review. Journal of Early Intervention, 37(1), 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815115595461
37.
SolomonB. G.KleinS. A.PolityloB. C. (2012). The effect of performance feedback on teachers’ treatment integrity: A meta-analysis of the single-case literature. School Psychology Review, 41(2), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087518
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
