The purpose of this study was to determine whether struggling adolescent writers could learn sentence and paragraph writing skills from a software program. Nine junior-high and nine senior-high struggling writers participated in a multiple-probe across-students design that was replicated six times. Instructional procedures within the software program were based on methods previously found to be successful in teaching learning strategies to adolescents. Measures included scores on practice activities, time spent working through the program, quiz and knowledge test scores, a sentence-construction score, a complete sentences score, a paragraph-organization score, a planning score, satisfaction with the software program, and satisfaction with personal writing skills. All of the students met mastery on all of the activities and quizzes in the program. Significant differences representing large effect sizes (range of Cohen’s d = 1.42 to 2.39) were found between baseline and post-instruction scores in the multiple-probe design on the Complete Sentence and Paragraph-Organization measures. Students indicated that they were satisfied with the software program and their own writing.
ACT. (2019). The official ACT prep guide 2019-2020. John Wiley & Sons.
2.
ApplebeeA.LangerJ. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle and high schools. English Journal, 100, 14–27.
3.
ArcherA.HughesC. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Efficient and effective teaching. Guilford Publications.
4.
BuiY.SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (2006). Effects of a comprehensive package of writing strategy interventions on the writing performance of students with disabilities on state writing competency exams. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21(4), 244–260.
5.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin.
6.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
CutlerL.GrahamS. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 907–919. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012656
8.
DatchukS. M. (2016). Writing simple sentences and descriptive paragraphs: Effects of an intervention on adolescents with writing difficulties. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 166–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9236-x
9.
DatchukS. M. (2017). A direct instruction and precision teaching intervention to improve the sentence construction of middle school students with writing difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 51, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916665588
10.
DatchukS. M.KubinaR. M. (2012). A review of teaching sentence-level writing skills to students with writing difficulties and learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 34(3), 180–192. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741932512448254
11.
DatchukS. M.KubinaR. M. (2017). A writing intervention to teach simple sentences and descriptive paragraphs to adolescents with writing difficulties. Education and Treatment of Children, 40, 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2017.0013
12.
DatchukS. M.RodgersD. B. (2018). Text writing within simple sentences: A writing fluency intervention for students with high-incidence disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12185
13.
DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B. (1988). An instructional model for teaching students how to learn. In GradenJ. L.ZinsJ. E.CurtisM. J. (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 391–411). The National Association of School Psychologists.
14.
DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B. (2006). Teaching adolescents with disabilities: Accessing the general education curriculum. Corwin Press.
15.
DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B.BuiY.VernonD. S. (2006). High schools and adolescents with disabilities: Challenges at every turn. In DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B. (Eds.), Teaching adolescents with disabilities: Accessing the general education curriculum (pp. 1–34). Corwin Press.
16.
EllisE. S.DeshlerD. D.LenzB. K.SchumakerJ. B.ClarkF. L. (1991). An instructional model for teaching learning strategies. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23(6), 1–24. (Reprinted from Educating Students with Mild Disabilities, pp. 151–187, by E. L. Meyen, G. A. Vergason, & R. J. Whelan (Eds.), Love Publishing Co)
17.
EllisE. S.DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B. (1989). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities to generate and use task-specific strategies. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(2), 108–119, 130. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221948902200206
18.
FureyW. M.MarcotteA. M.WellsC. S.HintzeJ. M. (2017). The effects of supplemental sentence-level instruction for fourth-grade students identified as struggling writers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(6), 563–578. http://dxdoi.org/10.1080/10573569.2017.1288591
19.
GilbertJ.GrahamS. (2010). Teaching writing to elementary students in grades 4 to 6: A national survey. Elementary School Journal, 110, 494–518. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/651193
20.
GillespieA.GrahamS. (2014). A meta-analysis of writing interventions for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 453–473. http://doi:10.1177/0014402914527238
21.
GrahamS.CollinsA. A.Rigby-WillsH. (2017). Writing characteristics of students with learning disabilities and typically achieving peers: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 83(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916664070
22.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2013). Common core state Standards, writing, and students with LD: Recommendations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 28(1), 28–37. https://dx.doi.ord/10.11/ldrp.12004
23.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007a). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–476. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
24.
GrahamS.PerinD. (2007b). Writing next: A report to the Carnegie corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education.
25.
HornerR. D.BaerD. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation of the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196. https://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-189
26.
KiuharaS.GrahamS.HawkenL. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 136–160. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013097
27.
KlineF. M.SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (1991). Development and validation of feedback routines for instructing students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(3), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510849
LancasterP. E.LancasterS. J. C.HughesC. A. (2007). A multimedia program for teaching students to use the Test-Taking Strategy. Edge Enterprises, Inc.
30.
LancasterP. E.LancasterS. J. C.SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (2006). The efficacy of an interactive hypermedia program for teaching a test-taking strategy to students with high-incidence disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 17–30. http://doi:10.1177/016264340602100202
31.
LancasterP. E.LancasterS. J. C.Van ReusenA. K. (2005). A multimedia program for teaching students to use the self-advocacy strategy. Edge Enterprises, Inc.
32.
LancasterP. E.SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (2002). The development and validation of an interactive hypermedia program for teaching a self-advocacy strategy to students with disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 277–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511358
33.
LancasterP. E.SchumakerJ. B.LancasterS. J. C.DeshlerD. D. (2009). Effects of a computerized program on use of the Test-taking Strategy by students with disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(3), 165–179. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/27740366
34.
LaneS. F.LewandowskiL. (1994). Oral and written compositions of students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 142–153.
35.
MoranM. R. (1981). Performance of learning disabled and low achieving secondary students on formal features of a paragraph-writing task. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 271–280. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1510948
36.
MyersB.ParkS. Y.NakanoY.MuellerG.KoA. (September, 2008). How designers design and program interactive behaviors [Paper presentation]. 2008 IEEE Symposium of Visual Language and Human-Centric Computing. Herrsching am Ammersee, Germany.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012–470). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
39.
National Commission on Writing. (2006). Writing and school reform. College Board.
40.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, and technical subjects. http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/ELA_Standards1.pdf
41.
NewcomerP. L.BarenbaumE. M. (1991). The written composing ability of children with learning disabilities: A review of the literature from 1980-1990. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 578–593. http://doi:10.1177/0022221949102401001
42.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. (2009). An improved effect size for single-case research: Nonoverlap of all pairs. Behavior Therapy, 40, 357–367.
43.
PoplinM. S.GrayR.LarsenS.BanikowskiA.MehringT. (1980). A comparison of components of written expression abilities in learning disabled and non-learning disabled students at three grade levels. Learning Disability Quarterly, 3, 46–53. http://doi:10.2307/1510674
44.
Princeton Review. (2018). Cracking the SAT: 2020 Edition. Penguin Random House, LLC.
45.
PustejovskyJ. E. (2020). Scdhlm: A Web-based calculator for between-case standardized mean differences (Version 0.4.2.9000)/[Web application/]. https://jepusto.shinyapps.io/scdhlm
46.
PutnamL. M.DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B. (1992). The investigation of setting demands: A missing link in learning strategy instruction. In MeltzerL. (Ed.), Strategy assessment and instruction for students with learning disabilities: From theory to practice (pp. 325–351). Pro-Ed.
47.
RayA. B.GrahamS.LiuX. (2018, August10). Effects of SRSD college entrance essay exam instruction for high school students with disabilities or at-risk for writing difficulties. Reading and Writing, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9900-3/
48.
SaddlerB.AsaroK.BehforoozB. (2008). The effects of peer-assisted sentence-combining practice on four young writers with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 6, 17–31.
49.
SaddlerB.BehforoozB.AsaroK. (2008). The effects of sentence-combining instruction on the writing of fourth-grade students with writing difficulties. Journal of Special Education, 42, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.43
50.
SaddlerB.GrahamS. (2005). The effects of peer-assisted sentence-combining instruction on the writing performance of more ad less skilled young writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.43
51.
SchmidtJ. L.DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B.AlleyG. R. (1988–1989). Effects of generalization instruction on the written language performance of adolescents with learning disabilities in the mainstream classroom. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 4(4), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/0748763880040406
52.
SchrankF. A.MatherN.McGrewK. S. (2014). Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery IV: Tests of achievement. Riverside.
53.
SchumakerJ. B. (2013). The fundamentals of paragraph writing; A multimedia program for teaching paragraph writing strategies. Edge Enterprises, Inc.
54.
SchumakerJ. B. (2014). Proficiency in paragraph writing: A multimedia program for teaching students to write a variety of paragraphs. Edge Enterprises, Inc.
55.
SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (1984). Setting demand variables: A major factor in program planning for the LD adolescent. Topics in Language Disorders, 4(2), 22–40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00011363-198403000-00006
56.
SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (1992). Validation of learning strategy interventions for students with LD: Results of a programmatic research effort. In WongB. Y. L. (Ed.), Intervention research with students with learning disabilities. Springer-Verlag.
57.
SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (2003). Can students with LD become competent writers?Learning Disability Quarterly, 26(2), 129–141. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1593595
58.
SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (2006). Teaching adolescents to be strategic learners. In DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B. (Eds.), Teaching adolescents with disabilities: Accessing the general education curriculum (pp. 1–34). Corwin Press.
59.
SchumakerJ. B.DeshlerD. D. (2009). Adolescents with learning disabilities as writers: Are we selling them short?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(2), 81–92.
60.
SchumakerJ. B.FisherJ. B.WalshL. D. (2019). Effects of computerized instruction on the use of punctuation strategies by students with LD. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(3), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12203
61.
SchumakerJ. B.LyerlaK. (1991). The paragraph writing strategy: Instructor’s manual. University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning.
62.
SchumakerJ. B.SheldonJ. B. (1985). Proficiency in the sentence writing strategy: Instructor’s manual. The University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning.
63.
SchumakerJ. B.SheldonJ. B. (1998). Fundamentals in the sentence writing strategy: Instructor’s manual. The University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning.
64.
SchumakerJ. B.SheldonJ. B. (2009). Multimedia program for teaching the Commas Strategies to students. Edge Enterprises, Inc.
65.
SchumakerJ. B.SheldonJ. B. (2010). Multimedia program for teaching the punctuation strategies to students. Edge Enterprises, Inc.
66.
SchumakerJ. B.WalshL. D.FisherJ. B. (2019). Effects of computerized instruction on mastery and generalized use of commas strategies by students with LD. Journal of Special Education Technology, 1–15. https://doi.org/101177/0162643419878146
67.
ShapiroS. S.WilkM. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3-4), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591
68.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM. (1998). Experimental intervention research for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 276–321. http://doi:10.3102/00346543068003277
69.
SwansonH. L.HoskynM.LeeC. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Guilford Press.
70.
Van ReusenA. K.BosC. S.DeshlerD. D.SchumakerJ. B. (1994). The self-advocacy strategy: Instructor’s manual. Edge Enterprises, Inc.
71.
WarnerM. M.SchumakerJ. B.AlleyG. R.DeshlerD. D. (1980). Learning disabled adolescents in the public schools: Are they different from other low achievers?Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1(2), 27–35. http://doi:10.1177/074193258000100207
WolfM. M. (1978). The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214.
74.
ZigmondN.ThortonH. (1985). Follow-up of postsecondary age learning disabled graduates and drop-outs. Learning Disabilities Research, 1(1), 50–55.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
