The Effect of a Morphological Awareness Intervention on Early Writing Outcomes

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a morphological awareness intervention on the spelling and writing of second-grade (n = 16) and third-grade (n = 10) students at risk for learning disabilities. The intervention was provided for 25 min per session 4 to 5 times per week for 5 weeks. Students were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 13) or comparison (n = 13) condition. Students were pre- and posttested using standardized tests of spelling and writing and were progress monitored twice weekly with a curriculum-based measure of writing. Intervention effects were measured using a univariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) on each outcome. Growth on the progress monitoring task was measured using hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). Results indicated the intervention did not have a significant effect on outcomes but a moderate positive effect was detected on writing. Practical applications including intervention revisions and feasibility of use are discussed.

Keywords

writing instructional strategies at risk language arts

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

A. A.

Jung

P.-G.

Poch

A. L.

Brandes

Shin

Lembke

E. S.

McMaster

K. M.

(2019). Technical adequacy of curriculum-based measures in writing in grades 1–3. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10573569.2019.1689211

Apel

Brimo

Diehm

Apel

(2013). Morphological awareness intervention with kindergartners and first- and second-grade students from low socioeconomic status homes: A feasibility study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44(2), 161–173.

Apel

Diehm

(2014). Morphological awareness intervention with kindergarteners and first and second grade students from low SES homes: A small efficacy study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 65–75.

Apel

Werfel

(2014). Using morphological awareness instruction to improve written language skills. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 45(4), 251–260.

Apel

Wilson-Fowler

E. B.

Brimo

Perrin

N. A.

(2012). Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students. Reading and Writing, 25(6), 1283–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9317-8

Berninger

Amtmann

(2003). Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice. In Swanson

H. L.

Harris

Graham

(Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 345–363). Guilford.

Bowers

P. N.

Kirby

J. R.

Deacon

S. H.

(2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144–179. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309359353

Brimo

(2016). Evaluating the effectiveness of a morphological awareness intervention: A pilot study. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 38(1), 35–45.

Carlisle

J. F.

(2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 464–487.

10.

Carlisle

J. F.

Fleming

(2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 239–253.

11.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Academic Press.

12.

Coker

D. L.

(2006). Impact of first-grade factors on the growth and outcomes of urban schoolchildren’s primary-grade writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 471–488.

13.

Coker

D. L.

Ritchey

K. D.

Uribe-Zarain

Jennings

A. S.

(2017). An analysis of first-grade writing profiles and their relationship to compositional quality. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(4), 336–350.

14.

Cutler

Graham

(2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907–919.

15.

Deno

S. L.

Mirkin

P. K.

Marston

(1980). Relationships among simple measures of written expression and performance on standardized achievement tests (No. IRLDRR-22). Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities, University of Minnesota.

16.

Devonshire

Morris

Fluck

(2013). Spelling and reading development: The effect of teaching children multiple levels of representation in their orthography. Learning and Instruction, 25, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.007

17.

Dolch

E. W.

(1936). A basic sight vocabulary. Elementary School Journal, 36, 456–460.

18.

Good

J. E.

Lance

D. M.

Rainey

(2015). The effects of morphological awareness training on reading, spelling, and vocabulary skills. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 36(3), 142–151.

19.

Goodwin

A. P.

Ahn

(2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0041-x

20.

Goodwin

A. P.

Ahn

(2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(4), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.689791

21.

Graham

Harris

K. R.

McKeown

(2013). The writing of students with learning disabilities, meta-analysis of self-regulated strategy development writing intervention studies, and future directions: Redux. In Swanson

Harris

K. R.

Graham

(Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 405–438). Guilford Press.

22.

Green

McCutchen

Schwiebert

Quinlan

Eva-Wood

Juelis

(2003). Morphological development in children’s writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.752

23.

Kim

Y.-S.

Al Otaiba

Folsom

J. S.

Greulich

Puranik

(2014). Evaluating the dimensionality of first-grade written composition. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 57(1), 199–211.

24.

Kim

Y.-S.

Al Otaiba

Puranik

Folsom

J. S.

Greulich

Wagner

R. K.

(2011). Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.004

25.

Kim

Y.-S.

Al Otaiba

Wanzek

Gatlin

(2015). Toward an understanding of dimensions, predictors, and the gender gap in written composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 79–95.

26.

Kim

Y.-S.

Gatlin

Al Otaiba

Wanzek

(2018). Theorization and an empirical investigation of the component-based and developmental text writing fluency construct. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(4), 320–335.

27.

Kim

Y.-S.

Puranik

Al Otaiba

(2015). Developmental trajectories in writing skills in first grade: Examining the effects of SES and language and/or speech impairments. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 593–613.

28.

Kim

Y.-S.

Schatschneider

(2017). Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 35–50.

29.

Lembke

Deno

S. L.

Hall

(2003). Identifying an indicator of growth in early writing proficiency for elementary school students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(3–4), 23–35.

30.

McCutchen

Stull

(2015). Morphological awareness and children’s writing: Accuracy, error, and invention. Reading and Writing, 28(2), 271–289.

31.

McCutchen

Stull

Herrera

B. L.

Lotas

Evans

(2013). Putting words to work: Effects of morphological instruction on children’s writing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509969

32.

McMaster

K. L.

Yeo

Deno

S. L.

Parker

Ellis

(2011). Curriculum-based measures of beginning writing: Technical features of the slope. Exceptional Children, 77(2), 185–206.

33.

Nagy

W. E.

Carlisle

J. F.

Goodwin

A. P.

(2014). Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509967

34.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012–470). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

35.

National Commission on Writing for America’s Families, Schools, and Colleges. (2004). Writing: A ticket to work. . .or a ticket out: A survey of business leaders. The College Board.

36.

Nunes

Bryant

Olsson

(2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 289–307.

37.

Parel

(2006). The impact of training in morphological analysis on literacy in the primary grades. International Journal of Learning, 13(1), 19–128.

38.

Parker

D. C.

McMaster

K. L.

Medhanie

Silberglitt

(2011). Modeling early writing growth with curriculum-based measures. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(4), 290–304.

39.

Perfetti

(2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383.

40.

Reed

D. K.

(2008). A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in grades K-12. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(1), 36–49.

41.

Ritchey

K. D.

Coker

D. L.

Jr. (2014). Identifying writing difficulties in first grade: An investigation of writing and reading measures. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(2), 54–65.

42.

Rubin

(1988). Morphological knowledge and early writing ability. Language and Speech, 31(4), 337–355.

43.

Semel

Wiig

Secord

W. A.

(2013). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (5th ed.). The Psychological Corporation.

44.

Swanson

H. L.

Berninger

V. W.

(1996). Individual differences in children’s working memory and writing skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63(2), 358–385.

45.

Treiman

Cassar

(1996). Effects of morphology on children’s spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141–170.

46.

Videen

Deno

Marston

(1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of proficiency in written expression (No. IRLDRR-84). University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

47.

Weschler

(2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). The Psychological Corporation.

48.

Wolter

J. A.

Dilworth

(2013). The effects of a multilinguistic morphological awareness approach for improving language and literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 76–85.

49.

Wolter

J. A.

Wood

D’zatko

K. W.

(2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(3), 286–298.

50.

Woodcock

R. W.

McGrew

F. A.

Mather

Schrank

F. A.

(2007). Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement (3rd ed.). Riverside Publishing.