The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a morphological awareness intervention on the spelling and writing of second-grade (n = 16) and third-grade (n = 10) students at risk for learning disabilities. The intervention was provided for 25 min per session 4 to 5 times per week for 5 weeks. Students were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 13) or comparison (n = 13) condition. Students were pre- and posttested using standardized tests of spelling and writing and were progress monitored twice weekly with a curriculum-based measure of writing. Intervention effects were measured using a univariate analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) on each outcome. Growth on the progress monitoring task was measured using hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). Results indicated the intervention did not have a significant effect on outcomes but a moderate positive effect was detected on writing. Practical applications including intervention revisions and feasibility of use are discussed.
AllenA. A.JungP.-G.PochA. L.BrandesD.ShinJ.LembkeE. S.McMasterK. M. (2019). Technical adequacy of curriculum-based measures in writing in grades1–3. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10573569.2019.1689211
2.
ApelK.BrimoD.DiehmE.ApelL. (2013). Morphological awareness intervention with kindergartners and first- and second-grade students from low socioeconomic status homes: A feasibility study. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44(2), 161–173.
3.
ApelK.DiehmE. (2014). Morphological awareness intervention with kindergarteners and first and second grade students from low SES homes: A small efficacy study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 65–75.
4.
ApelK.WerfelK. (2014). Using morphological awareness instruction to improve written language skills. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 45(4), 251–260.
5.
ApelK.Wilson-FowlerE. B.BrimoD.PerrinN. A. (2012). Metalinguistic contributions to reading and spelling in second and third grade students. Reading and Writing, 25(6), 1283–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9317-8
6.
BerningerV.AmtmannD. (2003). Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 345–363). Guilford.
7.
BowersP. N.KirbyJ. R.DeaconS. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 144–179. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309359353
8.
BrimoD. (2016). Evaluating the effectiveness of a morphological awareness intervention: A pilot study. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 38(1), 35–45.
9.
CarlisleJ. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 464–487.
10.
CarlisleJ. F.FlemingJ. (2003). Lexical processing of morphologically complex words in the elementary years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 239–253.
11.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
12.
CokerD. L. (2006). Impact of first-grade factors on the growth and outcomes of urban schoolchildren’s primary-grade writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 471–488.
13.
CokerD. L.RitcheyK. D.Uribe-ZarainX.JenningsA. S. (2017). An analysis of first-grade writing profiles and their relationship to compositional quality. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(4), 336–350.
14.
CutlerL.GrahamS. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907–919.
15.
DenoS. L.MirkinP. K.MarstonD. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of written expression and performance on standardized achievement tests (No. IRLDRR-22). Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities, University of Minnesota.
16.
DevonshireV.MorrisP.FluckM. (2013). Spelling and reading development: The effect of teaching children multiple levels of representation in their orthography. Learning and Instruction, 25, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.007
17.
DolchE. W. (1936). A basic sight vocabulary. Elementary School Journal, 36, 456–460.
18.
GoodJ. E.LanceD. M.RaineyJ. (2015). The effects of morphological awareness training on reading, spelling, and vocabulary skills. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 36(3), 142–151.
19.
GoodwinA. P.AhnS. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0041-x
20.
GoodwinA. P.AhnS. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-age children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(4), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.689791
21.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.McKeownD. (2013). The writing of students with learning disabilities, meta-analysis of self-regulated strategy development writing intervention studies, and future directions: Redux. In SwansonL.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 405–438). Guilford Press.
22.
GreenL.McCutchenD.SchwiebertC.QuinlanT.Eva-WoodA.JuelisJ. (2003). Morphological development in children’s writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.752
23.
KimY.-S.Al OtaibaS.FolsomJ. S.GreulichL.PuranikC. (2014). Evaluating the dimensionality of first-grade written composition. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 57(1), 199–211.
24.
KimY.-S.Al OtaibaS.PuranikC.FolsomJ. S.GreulichL.WagnerR. K. (2011). Componential skills of beginning writing: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.06.004
25.
KimY.-S.Al OtaibaS.WanzekJ.GatlinB. (2015). Toward an understanding of dimensions, predictors, and the gender gap in written composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 79–95.
26.
KimY.-S.GatlinB.Al OtaibaS.WanzekJ. (2018). Theorization and an empirical investigation of the component-based and developmental text writing fluency construct. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(4), 320–335.
27.
KimY.-S.PuranikC.Al OtaibaS. (2015). Developmental trajectories in writing skills in first grade: Examining the effects of SES and language and/or speech impairments. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 593–613.
28.
KimY.-S.SchatschneiderC. (2017). Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 35–50.
29.
LembkeE.DenoS. L.HallK. (2003). Identifying an indicator of growth in early writing proficiency for elementary school students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(3–4), 23–35.
30.
McCutchenD.StullS. (2015). Morphological awareness and children’s writing: Accuracy, error, and invention. Reading and Writing, 28(2), 271–289.
31.
McCutchenD.StullS.HerreraB. L.LotasS.EvansS. (2013). Putting words to work: Effects of morphological instruction on children’s writing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509969
32.
McMasterK. L.DuX.YeoS.DenoS. L.ParkerD.EllisT. (2011). Curriculum-based measures of beginning writing: Technical features of the slope. Exceptional Children, 77(2), 185–206.
33.
NagyW. E.CarlisleJ. F.GoodwinA. P. (2014). Morphological knowledge and literacy acquisition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509967
34.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The nation’s report card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012–470). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
35.
National Commission on Writing for America’s Families, Schools, and Colleges. (2004). Writing: A ticket to work. . .or a ticket out: A survey of business leaders. The College Board.
36.
NunesT.BryantP.OlssonJ. (2003). Learning morphological and phonological spelling rules: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 289–307.
37.
ParelR. (2006). The impact of training in morphological analysis on literacy in the primary grades. International Journal of Learning, 13(1), 19–128.
38.
ParkerD. C.McMasterK. L.MedhanieA.SilberglittB. (2011). Modeling early writing growth with curriculum-based measures. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(4), 290–304.
39.
PerfettiC. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383.
40.
ReedD. K. (2008). A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in grades K-12. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(1), 36–49.
41.
RitcheyK. D.CokerD. L.Jr. (2014). Identifying writing difficulties in first grade: An investigation of writing and reading measures. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(2), 54–65.
42.
RubinH. (1988). Morphological knowledge and early writing ability. Language and Speech, 31(4), 337–355.
43.
SemelE.WiigE.SecordW. A. (2013). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (5th ed.). The Psychological Corporation.
44.
SwansonH. L.BerningerV. W. (1996). Individual differences in children’s working memory and writing skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63(2), 358–385.
45.
TreimanR.CassarM. (1996). Effects of morphology on children’s spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141–170.
46.
VideenJ.DenoS.MarstonD. (1982). Correct word sequences: A valid indicator of proficiency in written expression (No. IRLDRR-84). University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
47.
WeschlerD. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). The Psychological Corporation.
48.
WolterJ. A.DilworthV. (2013). The effects of a multilinguistic morphological awareness approach for improving language and literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 76–85.
49.
WolterJ. A.WoodA.D’zatkoK. W. (2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(3), 286–298.
50.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewF. A.MatherN.SchrankF. A. (2007). Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement (3rd ed.). Riverside Publishing.
