Individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) often have difficulties with self-management skills such as scheduling daily tasks for educational, vocational, and leisure purposes. In this study, we used a multiple probe across participant design to evaluate the effects of constant time delay in teaching young adults with IDD the necessary steps to schedule events and set reminders using the Calendar application (app). Three students with IDD in a postsecondary education setting participated in this study and acquired the steps required for programming events and their reminders in the Calendar app. In addition, two participants independently attended the scheduled events without additional reminders from adults. Limitations, future research, and practical implications are discussed.
ArcherA. L.HughesC. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford Press.
3.
AyresK. M.MechlingL.SansostiF. J. (2013). The use of mobile technologies to assist with life skills/independence of students with moderate/severe intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorders: Considerations for the future of school psychology. Psychology in the Schools, 50(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21673
4.
BartonE. E.LloydB. P.SpriggsA. D.GastD. L. (2018). Visual analysis of graphic data. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research in behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 179–214). Routledge.
5.
BrownW. H.OdomS. L. (1994). Strategies and tactics for promoting generalization and maintenance of young children’s social behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-4222(94)90016-7
6.
CoughlinJ.McCoyK. M.KenzerA.MathurS. R.ZuckerS. H. (2012). Effects of a self-monitoring strategy on independent work behavior of students with mild intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(2), 154–164.
7.
DogoeM.BandaD. R. (2009). Review of recent research using constant time delay to teach chained tasks to persons with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 177–186.
8.
DoughertyK. M.JohnstonJ. M. (1996). Overlearning, fluency, and automaticity. The Behavior Analyst, 19(2), 289–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393171
9.
DouglasK. H.UpholdN. M. (2014). iPad® or iPod touch®: Evaluating self-created electronic photographic activity schedules and student preferences. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341402900301
10.
FreedmanS. (2010). Developing college skills in students with autism and Asperger’s syndrome. Jessica Kingsley.
11.
GetzelE. E.McManusS. (2005). Expanding support services on campus. In GetzelE. E.WehmanP. (Eds.), Going to college: Expanding opportunities for people with disabilities (pp. 139–154). Paul H. Brookes.
12.
GetzelE. E.ThomaC. A. (2008). Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 31(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885728808317658
13.
GunnS. L.SellersT. P.Lignugaris/KraftB. (2017). Application of coaching and behavioral skills training during a preschool practicum with a college student with autism spectrum disorder. Clinical Case Studies, 16(4), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534650117692673
14.
HasbrouckJ. E.IhnotC.RogersG. H. (1999). “Read naturally”: A strategy to increase oral reading fluency. Reading Research and Instruction, 39, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079909558310
KagoharaD. M.van der MeerL.SathiyaprakashR.O’ReillyM. F.LancioniG. E.DavisT. N.RispoliM.LangR.MarschikP. B.SutherlandD.GreenV. A.SigafoosJ. (2013). Using iPods and iPads in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.027
19.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research design: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
20.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794
LancioniG. E.SinghN. N. (2014). Assistive technologies for improving quality of life. In LancioniG. E.SinghN. N. (Eds.), Assistive technologies for people with diverse abilities (pp. 1–20). Springer.
23.
LaneJ. D.GastD. L. (2014). Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24, 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2013.815636
24.
LangR.RamdossS.RaulstonT.CarnetA.SigafoosJ.DiddenR.MooreD.O’ReillyM. F. (2014). Assistive technology for people with autism spectrum disorder. In LancioniG. E.SinghN. N. (Eds.), Assistive technologies for people with diverse abilities (pp. 157–190). Springer.
25.
McMahonD. D.CihakD. F.GibbonsM. M.FussellL. (2013). Using a mobile app to teach individuals with intellectual disabilities to identify potential food allergens. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(3), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341302800302
26.
MechlingL. C. (2007). Assistive technology as a self-management tool for prompting students with intellectual disabilities to initiate and complete daily tasks: A literature review. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42(3), 252–269.
27.
MylesB. S.FergusonH.HagiwaraT. (2007). Using a personal digital assistant to improve the recording of homework assignments by an adolescent with Asperger syndrome. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220021001
28.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA. M. (2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2)(NCSER 2009-3017). SRI International. www.nlts2.org/reports/2009_04/nlts2_report_2009_04_complete.pdf
29.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.WeiX.CametoR.ContrerasE.FergusonK.GreeneS.SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school. A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2)(NCSER 2011-3005). SRI International. https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pubs/20113005/pdf/20113005.pdf
RichardsS. B.BradyM. P.TaylorR. L. (2014). Cognitive and intellectual disabilities: Historical perspective, current practices, and future directions (2nd ed.). Routledge.
32.
RichterS. M.MustianA. L.TestD. W. (2012). Teaching strategies. In TestD. W. (Ed.), Evidence-based instructional strategies for transition (pp. 29–44). Paul H Brookes.
33.
RoedigerH. L. (1980). The effectiveness of four mnemonics in ordering recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.558
34.
SchulzeM. A. (2016). Self-management strategies to support students with ASD. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(5). 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916640759
35.
SchwartzK.MactavishJ.LutfiyyaZ. M. (2006). Making community connections: Educator perspectives on transition planning for students with intellectual disabilities. Exceptionality Education Canada, 16, 73–100.
36.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A.CastoG. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258700800206
37.
SpriggsA. D.MimsP. J.van DijkW.KnightV. F. (2017). Examination of the evidence base for using visual activity schedules with students with intellectual disability. Journal of Special Education, 5, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916658483
38.
StromerR.KimballJ. W.KinneyE. M.TaylorB. A. (2006). Activity schedules, computer technology, and teaching children with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576060210010301
39.
TherrienW. J.TaylorJ. C.WattS.KaldenbergE. R. (2014). Science instruction for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513503557
40.
UpholdN. M.DouglasK. H.LosekeD. L. (2016). Effects of using an iPod app to manage recreation tasks. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39, 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414548572
41.
van DijkW.GageN. A. (2019). The effectiveness of visual activity schedules for individuals with intellectual disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 44(4), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2018.1431761
WehmeyerM. L. (1999). Assistive technology and students with mental retardation: Utilization and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264349901400104
44.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203
45.
WoodW. M.FowlerC. H.UpholdN.TestD. W. (2005). A review of self-determination interventions with individuals with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 121–146. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.3.121
46.
YuanC.Balint-LangelK.HuaY. (2019). Effects of constant time delay on route planning using Google maps for young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54(3), 215–224.
