Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Despite the pervasive use of wireless technology in today’s society, people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have limited access to technology. Technology is underutilized by this population for a variety of reasons including cost-related barriers and cognitive inaccessibility of devices and software applications. The lack of accessibility of these technologies is concerning, as people with disabilities often rely on technology to enhance independence and social integration. In the present study, a series of focus groups were conducted to determine what technologies individuals with IDD were using to navigate social environments and how they were using these technologies to improve their access to meaningful social experiences. Data were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach and an iterative, multi-cycle coding process. Six major themes emerged from the data, including Hardware and Software, Accessibility Features, Reasons for Connecting Socially, Barriers to and Supports for Connectivity, Concerns or Fears about Connectivity, and Outcomes of Social Connectivity. Findings have the potential to inform best practices for educators, transition specialists, parents, individuals with disabilities, and other stakeholders to advocate for increased training around and access to web-based technologies.

Keywords

intellectual disabilities developmental disabilities social skills mobile technology wireless technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alsalem

M. A.

(2016). Redefining literacy: The realities of digital literacy for students with disabilities in K-12. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(32), 205–215.

Asselin

S. B.

(2014). Learning and assistive technologies for college transition. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 40, 223–230. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-140687

Brickwood

K. J.

Watson

O’Brian

Williams

A. D.

(2019). Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 7(4), e11819. https://doi.org/10/2196/11819

Burgstahler

Crawford

(2007). Managing an e-mentoring community to support students with disabilities: A case study. AACE Journal, 15(2), 97–114.

Carey

A. C.

Friedman

M. G.

Bryen

D. N.

(2005). Use of electronic technologies by people with intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation, 43(5), 322–333.

Carter

E. W.

Sisco

L. G.

Chung

Y. C.

Stanton-Chapman

T. L.

(2010). Peer interactions of students with intellectual disabilities and/or autism: A map of the intervention literature. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 35(3–4), 63–79.

Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Physical activity. http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/basics/glossary/index.htm

Clement

Bigby

(2009). Breaking out of a distinct social space: Reflections on supporting community participation for people with severe and profound intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22(3), 264–275.

Davies

D. K.

Stock

S. E.

King

L. R.

Brown

R. B.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Shogren

K. A.

(2015). An interface to support independent use of Facebook by people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53(1), 30–41.

10.

Eshet

(2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

11.

Fernández-Batanero

J. M.

Cabero

López

(2019). Knowledge and degree of training of primary education teachers in relation to ICT taught to students with disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1961–1978.

12.

Glaser

Strauss

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine.

13.

Kaye

H. S.

(2000). Computer and internet use among people with disabilities. US Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.

14.

Lambert

V. A.

Lambert

C. E.

(2012). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255–256.

15.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

16.

Lombardi

Izzo

M V.

Gelbar

Murray

Buck

Johnson

Hsiao

Kowitt

(2017). Leveraging information technology literacy to enhance college and career readiness for secondary students with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 46(3), 389–397.

17.

Maher

Hadfield

Hutchings

de Eyto

(2018). Ensuring rigor in qualitative data analysis: A design research approach to coding combining NVivo with traditional material methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918786362

18.

Moisey

van de Keere

(2007). Inclusion and the internet: Teaching adults with developmental disabilities to use information and communication technology. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 35, 72–102.

19.

Palmer

S. B.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Davies

D. K.

Stock

S. E.

(2012). Family members’ reports of the technology use of family members with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(4), 402–414.

20.

Putnam

R. D.

(1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664–684.

21.

Spradley

J. P.

(1979). The ethnographic interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

22.

Stock

S. E.

Davies

D. K.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

(2008). Evaluation of cognitively accessible software to increase independent access to cellphone technology for people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52(12), 1155–1164.

23.

Tanis

E. S.

Palmer

Wehmeyer

Davies

D. K.

Stock

S. E.

Lobb

Bishop

(2012). Self-report computer-based survey of technology use by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 50(1), 53–68.

24.

Test

D. W.

Fowler

C. H.

Richter

S. M.

White

Mazzotti

Walker

A. R.

Kortering

(2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 115–128.

25.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Palmer

S. B.

Smith

S. J.

Davies

D. K.

Stock

(2008). The efficacy of technology use by people with intellectual disability: A single-subject design meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(3), 21–30.

26.

Wilson

R. E.

Gosling

S. D.

Graham

L. T.

(2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203–220.

Using Wireless Technology to Support Social Connectedness in Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Focus Group Study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References