Manipulatives offer students with disabilities access and support in classrooms. However, it is important for educators to be aware that concrete manipulatives are not the only option. Teachers serving students identified with a disability in the middle grades may consider selecting virtual manipulatives as supplement, complement, or in lieu of concrete manipulatives. In this technology in action, the authors provide information for educators about using virtual manipulatives and how they can be used across different settings, instructional needs, and mathematical content areas for middle school students with disabilities.
BelenkyD. M.NokesT. J. (2009). Examining the role of manipulatives and metacognition on engagement, learning, and transfer. The Journal of Problem Solving, 2, 6.
2.
BouckE. C.BassetteL.ShurrJ.ParkJ.KerrJ.WhorleyA. (2017). Teaching equivalent fractions to secondary students with disabilities via the virtual-representational-abstract instructional sequence. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32, 220–231.
3.
BouckE. C.ChamberlainC.ParkJ. (2017). Concrete and app-based manipulatives to support students with disabilities with subtraction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52, 317–331.
4.
BouckE. C.FlanaganS.BouckM. (2015). Learning area and perimeter with virtual manipulatives. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 34, 381–393.
5.
BouckE. C.ParkJ. (2018). Mathematics manipulatives to support students with disabilities: A systematic review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 41, 65–106.
6.
BouckE. C.ParkJ.LevyK.CwiakalaK.WhorleyA. (2019). App-based manipulatives and explicit instruction to support division with remainders. Exceptionality. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1080/09362835.2019.1486709
7.
BouckE. C.ParkJ.ShurrJ.BassetteL.WhorleyA. (2018). Using the virtual-representational-abstract approach to support students with intellectual disability in mathematics. Focus on Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 237–248.
8.
BouckE. C.ParkJ.SprickJ.ShurrJ.BassetteL.WhorleyA. (2017). Using the virtual-abstract instructional sequence to teach addition of fractions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 70, 163–174.
9.
BouckE. C.SatsangiR.ParkJ. (2018). The concrete-representational-abstract approach for students with learning disabilities: An evidence-based practice synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 39, 211–228.
10.
BouckE. C.ShurrJ.BassetteL.ParkJ.KerrJ.WhorleyA. (2018). Adding it up: Comparing concrete and app-based manipulatives to support students with disabilities with adding fractions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33, 194–206.
11.
BouckE. C.ShurrJ.TomK.JasperA. D.BassetteL.MillerB.FlanaganS. M. (2012). Fix it with TAPE: Repurposing technology to be assistive technology for students with high incidence disabilities. Preventing School Failure, 56, 121–128.
12.
BouckE. C.SprickJ. (2019). The virtual-representational-abstract framework for supporting students with disabilities in mathematics. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54, 173–180.
13.
BouckE. C.WorkingC.BoneE. (2018). Manipulative apps to support students with disabilities in mathematics. Intervention in School & Clinic, 53, 177–182.
CarbonneauK. J.MarleyS. C.SeligJ. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 380–400. doi:10.1037/a0031084
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446. (2004).
19.
JimenezB. A.StangerC. (2017). Math manipulatives for students with severe intellectual disability: A survey of special education teachers. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 36, 1–12.
20.
KimJ.KimJ.DesJardinsS. L.McCallB. P. (2015). Completing algebra II in high school: Does it increase college access and success?The Journal of Higher Education, 86, 628–662.
21.
MacciniP.GagnonJ. C. (2000). Best practices for teaching mathematics to secondary students with special needs. Focus on Exceptional Children, 32, 1–22.
MishraP.KoehlerM. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.
24.
MoyerP. S.BolyardJ. J.SpikellM. A. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives?Teaching Children Mathematics, 8, 372–377.
PeltierC.MorinK. L.BouckE. C.LingoM. E.PulosJ.SchefflerF. A.…DeardorffM. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of single-case research using mathematics manipulatives with students at risk or identified with a disability. Journal of Special Education. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1177/0022466919844516
27.
SatsangiR.BouckE. C. (2015). Using virtual manipulative instruction to teach the concepts of area and perimeter to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 174–186.
28.
SatsangiR.BouckE. C.Taber-DoughtyT.BofferdingL.RobertsC. A. (2016). Comparing the effectiveness of virtual and concrete manipulatives to learn algebra for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39, 240–253.
29.
SatsangiR.HammerR.EvmenovaA. S. (2018). Teaching multistep equations with virtual manipulatives to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33, 99–111. doi:10.111/ldrp.12166
30.
SatsangiR.MillerB. (2017). The case for adopting virtual manipulatives in mathematics education for students with disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 61, 303–310.
31.
ShinM.BryantD. P.BryantB. R.McKennaJ. W.HouF.OkM. W. (2017). Virtual manipulatives: Tools for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52, 148–153. doi:10.1177/1043451216644830
32.
SuhJ.Moyer-PackenhamP. (2007). Developing students’ representational fluency using virtual and physical algebra balances. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26, 155–173.
33.
Uribe-FlórezL. JWilkinsJ. L. (2010). Elementary school teachers’ manipulative use. School Science and Mathematics, 110, 363–371.
