Virtual manipulatives are interactive and dynamic visual objects on a screen, which allow students to manipulate them to construct mathematical knowledge. The purpose of this study was to synthesize the literature on interventions that used virtual manipulatives to improve the mathematics performance of K–12 students with learning disabilities. A total of 19 single-case design studies (16 peer-reviewed articles and three dissertations) were selected using specific selection criteria. Overall, students with learning disabilities demonstrated mathematical improvement after receiving interventions involving virtual manipulatives. Although many students with learning disabilities maintained and generalized the intervention effects, further research is required to verify the current findings.
AgrawalJ.MorinL. L. (2016). Evidence-based practices: Applications of concrete representational abstract framework across math concepts for students with disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12093
2.
BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.). (2007). Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities. Brookes.
3.
*BouckE. C.BassetteL.ShurrJ.ParkJ.KerrJ.WhorleyA. (2017). Teaching equivalent fractions to secondary students with disabilities via the virtual–representational–abstract instructional sequence. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(4), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417727291
4.
*BouckE. C.ChamberlainC.ParkJ. (2017). Concrete and app-based manipulatives to support students with disabilities with subtraction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(3), 317–331. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26420403
5.
BouckE. C.FlanaganS. (2009). Assistive technology and mathematics: What is there and where can we do in special education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340902400202
6.
BouckE. C.ParkJ. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on mathematics manipulatives to support students with disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(1), 65–106. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2018.0003
7.
*BouckE. C.ParkJ. (2020). App-based manipulatives and the system of least prompts to support acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of adding integers. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(2), 158–172.
8.
*BouckE. C.ParkJ.CwiakalaK.WhorleyA. (2020). Learning fraction concepts through the virtual-abstract instructional sequence. Journal of Behavioral Education, 29(3), 519–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-019-09334-9
9.
*BouckE. C.ParkJ.LevyK.CwiakalaK.WhorleyA. (2020). App-based manipulatives and explicit instruction to support division with remainders. Exceptionality, 28(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2019.1586709
10.
*BouckE. C.ParkJ.SatsangiR.CwiakalaK.LevyK. (2019). Using the virtual-abstract instructional sequence to support acquisition of algebra. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(4), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643419833022
11.
*BouckE. C.ParkJ.ShurrJ. (2019). Using the virtual-representational instructional sequence to support the acquisition and maintenance of mathematics for students with intellectual disability. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2019.1640999
12.
*BouckE. C.ParkJ.StenzelK. (2020). Virtual manipulatives as assistive technology to support students with disabilities with mathematics. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(4), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2020.1762157
13.
BouckE. C.SatsangiR.ParkJ. (2018). The concrete-representational-abstract approach for students with learning disabilities: An evidence-based practice synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 39(4), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517721712
14.
*BouckE. C.ShurrJ.BassetteL.ParkJ.WhorleyA. (2018). Adding it up: Comparing concrete and app-based manipulatives to support students with disabilities with adding fractions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(3), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418759341
BrunerJ. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist, 19(1), 1–15.
17.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.DiBiaseA.-M. (Eds.). (2004). Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
CookB.BuysseV.KlingnerJ.LandrumT.McWilliamR.TankersleyM.TestD. (2014). Council for Exceptional Children: Standards for evidence-based practices in special education. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(6), 206–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914531389
19.
FuchsL. S.GearyD. C.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.SeethalerP. M.BryantJ. D.SchatschneiderC. (2010). Do different types of school mathematics development depend on different constellations of numerical versus general cognitive abilities?Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1731–1746. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020662
20.
GearyD. C. (2011). Consequences, characteristics, and causes of mathematical learning disabilities and persistent low achievement in mathematics. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 32(3), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0b013e318209edef
21.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.NugentL.BaileyD. H. (2012). Mathematical cognition deficits in children with learning disabilities and persistent low achievement: A five-year prospective study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025398
22.
GerstenR.BeckmannS.ClarkeB.FoegenA.MarshL.StarJ. R.WitzelB. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle Schools (NCEE 2009-4060). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
23.
GoldinG.ShteingoldN. (2001). Systems of representations and the development of mathematical concepts. In CurcioF. R. (Ed.), The roles of representation in school mathematics: 2001 yearbook (pp. 1–23). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
24.
*HammerR. (2018). Virtual manipulatives with technology-based graphic organizers (VM + TBGO): A combined mathematics intervention to support secondary students with learning disabilities to solve proportion word problems (Publication No. 13420380) [Doctoral dissertation, George Mason University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
25.
JitendraA. K.NelsonG.PullesS. M.KissA. J.HouseworthJ. (2016). Is mathematical representation of problems an evidence-based strategy for students with mathematics difficulties?Exceptional Children, 83(1), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915625062
26.
JudgeS.WatsonS. R. (2011). Longitudinal outcomes for mathematics achievement for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Research, 104(3), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671003636729
27.
KiruE. W.DoablerC. T.SorrellsA. M.CoocN. A. (2018). A synthesis of technology-mediated mathematics interventions for students with or at risk for mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417745835
28.
LafayA.OsanaH. P.ValatM. (2019). Effects of interventions with manipulatives on immediate learning, maintenance, and transfer in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A systematic review. Education Research International, 2019, 2142948. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2142948
29.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G., & the PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), Article e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
30.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.HillemeierM. M.MaczugaS. (2016). Who is at risk for persistent mathematics difficulties in the United States?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414553849
31.
Moyer-PackenhamP. S.BolyardJ. J. (2016). Revisiting the definition of a virtual manipulative. In Moyer-PackenhamP. S. (Ed.), International perspectives on teaching and learning mathematics with virtual manipulatives (pp. 3–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1
32.
Moyer-PackenhamP. S.SuhJ. (2012). Learning mathematics with technology: The influence of virtual manipulatives on different achievement groups. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 31(1), 39–59. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/37643
Moyer-PackenhamP. S.WestenskowA. (2013). Effects of virtual manipulatives on student achievement and mathematics learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 4(3), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.4018/jvple.2013070103
35.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
36.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.
37.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org/Math
OkM. W.BryantD. P.BryantB. R. (2020). Effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities: A synthesis of the research. Exceptionality, 28(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2019.1579723
41.
OkM. W.KimW. (2017). Use of iPads and iPods for academic performance and engagement of preK-12 students with disabilities: A research synthesis. Exceptionality, 25(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1196446
42.
*ParkJ.BouckE. C.FisherM. H. (2021). Using the virtual–representational–abstract with overlearning instructional sequence to students with disabilities in mathematics. The Journal of Special Education, 54(4), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466920912527
43.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
44.
PeltierC.MorinK. L.BouckE. C.LingoM. E.PulosJ. M.SchefflerF. A.SukA.MathewsL. A.SinclairT. E.DeardorffM. E. (2020). A meta-analysis of single-case research using mathematics manipulatives with students at risk or identified with a disability. The Journal of Special Education, 54(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919844516
45.
PowellS. R.FluhlerS. K. (2020). A brief measure of mathematics symbols: Performance at grades 1, 3, and 5. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 45(4), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418809884
46.
ReimerK.Moyer-PackenhamP. S. (2005). Third-graders learn about fractions using virtual manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics & Science Teaching, 24(1), 5–25. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/teal_facpub/40
47.
*ReneauJ. L. (2013). Using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence to connect manipulatives, problem solving schemas, and equations in word problems with fractions (Publication No. 3530320) [Doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
SargentJ. F. (2017). The U.S. science and engineering workforce: Recent, current, and projected employment, wages, and unemployment. Congressional Research Service. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43061.pdf
50.
*SatsangiR.BouckE. C. (2015). Using virtual manipulative instruction to teach the concepts of area and perimeter to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(3), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714550101
51.
*SatsangiR.BouckE. C.Taber-DoughtyT.BofferdingL.RobertsC. A. (2016). Comparing the effectiveness of virtual and concrete manipulatives to teach algebra to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(4), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948716649754
52.
*SatsangiR.HammerR.EvmenovaA. S. (2018). Teaching multistep equations with virtual manipulatives to secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(2), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12166
53.
*SatsangiR.HammerR.HoganC. D. (2018). Studying virtual manipulatives paired with explicit instruction to teach algebraic equations to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41(4), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948718769248
54.
SayeskiK. L. (2008). Virtual manipulatives as an assistive technology support for students with high-incidence disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340802300104
55.
SerianniB. A. (2014). Supporting middle school students with emotional or behavioral disorders in blended learning: A fraction intervention using virtual manipulatives (Publication No. 4723) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
56.
ShalevR. S.AuerbachJ.ManorO.Gross-TsurV. (2000). Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and prognosis. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 9(2), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007870070009
57.
ShalevR. S.von AsterM. (2008). Identification, classification, and prevalence of developmental dyscalculia. Encyclopedia of Language and Literacy Development. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-12874
58.
*ShinM.BryantD. P. (2017). Improving the fraction word problem solving of students with mathematics learning disabilities: Interactive computer application. Remedial and Special Education, 38(2), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516669052
59.
ShinM.BryantD. P.BryantB. R.McKennaJ. W.HouF.OkM. W. (2017). Virtual manipulatives: Tools for teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 52(3), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451216644830
60.
*SimsekO. (2016). Use of a game-based app as a learning tool for students with mathematics learning disabilities to increase fraction knowledge/skill (Publication No. 10145359) [Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
61.
SnyderT. D.de BreyC.DillowS. A. (2019). Digest of education statistics 2018 (NCES 2020-009). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
62.
StevensJ. J.SchulteA. C. (2017). The interaction of learning disability status and student demographic characteristics on mathematics growth. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415618496
63.
StultzS. (2017). Computer-assisted mathematics instruction for students with specific learning disability: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(4), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417725881
64.
SuhJ. M.Moyer-PackenhamP. S. (2008). Scaffolding special needs students’ learning of fraction equivalence using virtual manipulatives. In FiguerasO.CortinaJ. L.AlatorreS.RojanoT.SepulvedaA. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 297–304). http://mason.gmu.edu/~jsuh4/tenure/part4thru8/papers/RR.PME32.pdf
65.
VannestK. J.NinciJ. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(4), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12038
66.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO.AdiguzelT. (2016). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. Texas A&M University. http://www.singlecaseresearch.org/
67.
VordermanC.PorkessR.BuddC.DunneR.Rahman-HartP. (2011). A world-class mathematics education for all our young people. Conservative Party.
68.
WoodwardJ.BeckmannS.DriscollM.FrankeM.HerzigP.JitendraA.KoedingerK. R.OgbuehiP. (2012). Improving mathematical problem solving in grades 4 through 8: A practice guide (NCEE 2012-4055). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
69.
WoodwardJ.CarnineD. (1993). Uses of technology for mathematics assessment and instruction: Reflection on a decade of innovations. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12(1), 38–48.
70.
*XinY. P.ParkJ. Y.TzurR.SiL. (2020). The impact of a conceptual model-based mathematics computer tutor on multiplicative reasoning and problem-solving of students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58, 100762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100762
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
