The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of digital behavior intervention plans (DBIPs) with multimedia anchored instruction on general education teachers’ fidelity of implementation while teaching students with disabilities. A multiple probe design was used to investigate the effects of DBIPs across six teacher–student dyads. The effects on student desirable and undesirable behaviors were also examined across all phases of the study. Data for all six teacher participants suggest a functional relationship and show that all teachers increased their fidelity of implementation of BIPs. In addition, the teachers’ fidelity of implementation of the BIPs showed a moderate to high effect on increasing desirable student behavior and neutralized undesirable student behavior. Further results and implications for fidelity of implementation and research are discussed.
AlgozzineB.HornerR. H.SugaiG.BarrettS.DickeyC. R.EberL.…TobinT. (2010). Evaluation blueprint for school-wide positive behavior support: Technical assistance center on positive behavioral interventions and supports. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pbis.org
2.
AndersonD. H. (2002). Effects of a CD-ROM training program to teach elementary education teachers to conduct descriptive analyses of problem behavior in their classrooms. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utah State University, Logan.
3.
BegenyJ. C.MartensB. K. (2006). Assessing pre-service teachers’ training in empirically validated behavioral instruction practices. School Psychology Quarterly, 21, 262–285.
4.
BrunvandS.FishmanB. (2006). Investigating the impact of the availability of scaffolds on preservice teachers noticing and learning from video. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35, 151–174.
5.
CarrE. G.HornerR. H.TurnbullA. P.MarquisJ. G.McLaughlinD. M.…McAteeM. L. (1999). Positive behavior support as an approach for dealing with problem behavior in people with developmental disabilities: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: AAMR.
6.
ClarkR. C.MayerR. E. (2008). e-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
7.
CoddingR. SLivanisA.PaceG. M.VacaL. (2008). Using performance feedback to improve treatment integrity of classwide behavior plans: An investigation of observer reactivity. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 417–422.
8.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt University. (1990). Anchored-instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19, 2–10.
9.
CookC. R.CrewsD. B.WrightG. R.MayerB.GaleB.KraemerB.GreshamF. M. (2007). Establishing and evaluating the substantive adequacy of positive behavioral support plans. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 191–206.
10.
Digennaro-ReedF. D.CoddingR.CataniaC. N.MaguireH. (2010). Effects of video modeling on treatment integrity of behavioral interventions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 291–295.
11.
DunlapG.CarrE. G.HomerR. H.KoegelR. L.SailorW.ClarkeS.…BuschbacherP. (2010). A descriptive, multiyear examination of positive behavior support. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 259–279.
12.
DusenburyL.BranniganR.FalcoM.HansenW. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237–256.
13.
ElksninL. K. (2001). Implementing the case method of instruction in special education teacher preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 95–107.
14.
EmersonE.KiernanC.AlborzA. (2001). The prevalence of challenging behaviors: A total population study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 77–93.
15.
GarriottP. P.MillerM.SnyderL. (2003). Preservice teachers’ beliefs about inclusive education: What should teacher educators know?Action in Teacher Education, 25, 48–54.
16.
GreshamF. M.MacMillanD. L.Geebe-FrankenbergerM. E.BocianK. M. (2000). Treatment integrity in learning disabilities intervention research: Do we really know how treatments are implemented?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 198–205.
17.
HollingsworthH. (2005, August). Learning about teaching and teaching about learning: Using video data for research and professional development. Paper presented at the meeting of the Australian Council for Educational Research, Using Data to Support Learning, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved fromhttp://www.acer.Edu.au/research_conferences/2005.html
18.
HornerR. D.BaerD. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation on the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196.
19.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
20.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA). PL 108-446, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et.seq.
21.
IovannoneR.GreenbaumP. E.WangW.KincaidD.DunlapG.StrainP. (2009). Randomized controlled trial of the prevent-teach-reinforce (PTR) tertiary intervention for students with problem behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 17, 213–225.
22.
KelleherC.Riley-TillmanT. C.PowerT. J. (2008). An initial comparison of collaborative and expert-driven consultation on treatment integrity. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 18, 294–324.
23.
LaneK. L.BocianK. M.MacMillanD. L.GreshamF. M. (2004). Treatment integrity: An essential—but often forgotten—component of school-based interventions. Preventing School Failure, 48, 36–43.
24.
LavieT.SturmeyP. (2002). Training staff to conduct a paired-stimulus preference assessment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 209–211.
25.
LiuX. S.MeyerJ. P. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions of their jobs: A multilevel analysis of the teacher follow-up survey for 1994–1995. Teachers College Record, 5, 985–1003.
26.
MayerR. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13, 125–139.
27.
McNaughtonD.HallT. E.MacciniP. (2001). Case-based instruction in special education teacher preparation: Practices and concerns of teacher educator/researchers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 84–94.
28.
MihalicS. F. (2004). Successful program implementation: Lessons from blueprints. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
29.
MooreJ. W.FisherW. W. (2007). The effects of videotape modeling on staff acquisition of functional analysis methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 197–202.
30.
NeefN. A.TrachtenbergS.LoebJ.SternerK. (1991). Video-based training of respite care workers: An interactional analysis of presentation format. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 473–486.
31.
NoellG. H.WittJ. C.SliderN. J.ConnellJ. E.GattiS. L.WilliamsK. L.…DuhonG. J. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34, 87–106.
32.
ReimersT. M.WackerD. P. (1988). Parents’ rating of the acceptability of behavioral treatment recommendation made in an outpatient clinic: A preliminary analysis of the influence of treatment effectiveness. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 7–15.
33.
ReschlyD. J.GreshamF.M. (2006, April). Implementation fidelity of SLD identification procedures. Paper presented at the National SEA Conference on SLD Determination: Integrating RTI within the SLD Determination Process, Kansas City, MO. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nrcld.org/sea/presentations_worksheets/fidelity/Reschly.pdf
34.
SchwartzD. L.BrophyS.LinX.BransfordJ. D. (1999). Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 39–59.
35.
SkibaR. J.RauschM. K. (2006). Zero Tolerance, Suspension, and Expulsion: Questions of Equity and Effectiveness. In EvertsonC. M.WeinsteinC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1063–1089). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
36.
SnyderP.McWilliamP. J. (2003). Using case method of instruction effectively in early intervention personnel preparation. Infants and Young Children, 16, 284–295.
37.
SnyderT. D.DillowS. A. (2012). Digest of education statistics, 2011(NCES 2012-001), Table 47. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
38.
SpragueJ.HornerR. (2007). School wide positive behavioral support. Handbook of school violence and school safety: From research to practice. S. R. Jimerson and M. J. Furlong, Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
39.
TawneyJ. W.GastD. L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
40.
ThomasC. N.RiethH. J. (2011). A research synthesis of the literature on multimedia anchored-instruction in preservice teacher education. Journal of Special Education Technology, 26, 1–22.
41.
TurnbullA.P.EdmonsonH.GriggsP.WickhamD.SailorW.FreemanR.…WarrenJ. (2002). A blueprint for school-wide positive behavior support: Implementation of three components. Exceptional Children, 68, 377–402.
42.
WagnerM.FriendM.BursuckW. D.KutashK.DuchnowskiA. J.SumiW. C.EpsteinM. (2006). Educating students with emotional disturbances: A national perspective on school programs and services. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 12–30.
43.
WallaceM. D.DoneyJ. K.Mintz-ResudekC. M.TarboxR. S. F. (2004). Training educators to implement functional analyses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 37, 89–92.
