Although functional behavioral assessments and behavior intervention plans (FBA-BIP) are standard practices for students with disabilities, the research base on the nature of FBA-BIPs is limited as most record reviews were conducted before 2010. We examined key compliance components of FBA-BIPs for 304 students with disabilities in one large U.S. local education agency, including demographic differences in FBA-BIP adequacy, and whether two key components could predict FBA-BIP quality. Results indicated variability in the quality rating of key FBA-BIP components and differences in FBA-BIP adequacy by grade level. Furthermore, strong associations were found between the overall quality of the FBA-BIP and the function of behavior as well as whether strategies were matched to the function. We discuss limitations, future research, and implications for professional learning and development.
BloodE.NeelR. S. (2007). From FBA to implementation: A look at what is actually being delivered. Education and Treatment of Children, 30(4), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2007.0021
2.
BruhnA. L.Balint-LangelK.TroughtonL.LanganS.LodgeK.KortemeyerS. (2015). Assessing and treating stereotypical behaviors using a functional approach. Behavioral Disorders, 41, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-41.1.21
3.
BruniT.DrevonD.HixsonM.WyseR.CorcoranS.FursaS. (2017). The effect of functional behavior assessment on school-based interventions: A meta-analysis of single-case research. Psychology in the Schools, 54, 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22007
4.
ConroyM. A.ClarkD.GableR. A.FoxJ. J. (1999). Building competence in the use of functional behavioral assessment. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 43(3), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459889909604989
5.
ConroyM. A.KatsiyannisA.ClarkD.GableR. A.FoxJ. J. (2002). State office of education practices implementing the IDEA disciplinary provisions. Behavioral Disorders, 27(2), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290202700201
6.
CookC. R.CrewsS. D.WrightD. B.MayerG. R.GaleB.KraemerB.GreshamF. M. (2007). Establishing and evaluating the substantive adequacy of positive behavioral support plans. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-006-9024-8
7.
CookC. R.MayerG. R.WrightD. B.KraemerB.WallaceM. D.DartE.CollinsT.RestoriA. (2012). Exploring the link among behavior intervention plans, treatment integrity, and student outcomes under natural educational conditions. The Journal of Special Education, 46(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466910369941
8.
CouvillonM. A.BullockL. M.GableR. A. (2009). Tracking behavior assessment methodology and support strategies: A national survey of how school utilize functional behavioral assessments and behavior intervention plans. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 14(3), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632750903073459
9.
GageN. A.LewisT. J.StichterJ. P. (2012). Functional behavioral assessment-based interventions for students with or at risk for emotional and/or behavioral disorders in school: A hierarchical linear modeling meta-analysis. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291203700201
10.
GarwoodJ. D. (2022). Special educator burnout and fidelity in implementing behavior support plans: A call to action. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266221099242
11.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400et seq. (2004). (Reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990).
IovannoneR.de BoerS.BatemanD.ChanP. (2022, April). Technical adequacy of state guidance documents for functional behavior assessments [Paper presentation]. Association for Positive Behavior Supports Conference, San Diego, CA, United States.
14.
KatsiyannisA.ConroyM.ZhangD. (2008). District-level administrators’ perspectives on implementation of functional behavior assessment in schools. Behavioral Disorders, 34(1), 14–26.
15.
KilluK.WeberK. P.DerbyK. M.BarrettoA. (2006). Behavior intervention planning and implementation of positive behavioral support plans. An examination of states’ adherence to standards for practice. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(4), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007060080040201
16.
Letter to Janssen, 51 IDELR 253 (OSERS 2008).
17.
LewisT. J.MitchellB. S.HarveyK.GreenA.McKenzieJ. (2015). A comparison of functional behavioral assessment and functional analysis methodology among students with mild disabilities. Behavioral Disorders, 41(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.17988/0198-7429-41.1.5
18.
LewisT. J.SugaiG. (1996a). Descriptive and experimental analysis of teacher and peer attention and the use of assessment based intervention to improve the pro-social behavior of a student in a general education setting. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110474
19.
LewisT. J.SugaiG. (1996b). Functional assessment of problem behavior: A pilot investigation of the comparative and interactive effects of teacher and peer social attention on students in general education settings. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088918
20.
LewisT. J.WehbyJ. H.ScottT. M. (2019). The Peacock Hill Working Group “problems and promises” three decades later: Introduction to the Creek Bend Consortium special issue. Behavioral Disorders, 44, 67–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918821323
MaagJ. W.KatsiyannisA. (2006). Behavioral intervention plans: Legal and practical considerations for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 31, 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290603100403
23.
MillerF. G.LeeD. L. (2013). Do functional behavioral assessments improve intervention effectiveness for students diagnosed with ADHD? A single-subject meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 253–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-013-9174-4
24.
NelsonJ. R.RobertsM. L.MathurS. R.RutherfordR. B. (1999). Has public policy exceeded our knowledge base: A review of the functional behavioral assessment literature. Behavioral Disorders, 24, 169–179.
25.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
26.
O’NeillR. E.AlbinR. W.StoreyK.HornerR. H.SpragueJ. R. (2015). Functional assessment program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.
27.
OSEP Questions and Answers. (1999, March12). Federal Register, 64(48), 12617–12632.
28.
ReidR.NelsonJ. R. (2002). The utility, acceptability, and practicality of functional behavioral assessment for students with high-incidence problem behaviors. Remedial and Special Education, 23(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193250202300103
29.
SassoG. M.ConroyM. A.StichterJ. P.FoxJ. J. (2001). Slowing down the bandwagon: The misapplication of functional assessment for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26(4), 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290102600407
30.
Strickland-CohenM. K.HornerR. H. (2015). Typical school personnel developing and implementing basic behavior support plans. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300714554714
31.
U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Functional behavioral assessment-based interventions: Children identified with or at risk for an emotional disturbance. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/InterventionReports/wwc_fba_011017.pdf
32.
Van AckerR.BoresonL.GableR. A.PottertonT. (2005). Are we on the right course? Lessons learned about current FBA/BIP practices in schools. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-005-0960-5
33.
WalkerV. L.ChungY.-C.BonnetL. K. (2018). Function-based intervention in inclusive school settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(4), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717718350
34.
ZirkelP. A. (2011). State special education laws for functional behavioral assessments and behavior intervention plans. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291103600405N
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
