Logging In to Press On: An Examination of High School Dropout and Completion Among Students With Disabilities in Online Courses

Abstract

Students with disabilities (SWDs) continue to experience rates of high school dropout greater than students not receiving special education services. Furthermore, there is a persistent gap in the rates of high school completion among students with and without disabilities. While criticized for lowering standards and learning, online learning represents a plausible mechanism to both decrease dropout and increase high school completion among SWDs. Drawing on theoretical frameworks advanced by Dynarski et al. and Cavanaugh et al., the current study uses a nationally representative data panel to investigate the association between online coursetaking among SWDs and two dependent variables: high school dropout and completion. Results indicated that online coursetaking was associated with increased probabilities of high school completion among SWDs. Implications and policy recommendations are discussed.

Keywords

online learning dropout high school completion students with disabilities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahn

McEachin

(2017). Student enrollment patterns and achievement in Ohio’s online charter schools. Educational Researcher, 46, 44–57.

Basham

J. D.

Stahl

(2014, 4). Supporting outcomes for all students in personalized learning environments. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.

Barbour

M. K.

Reeves

T. C.

(2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 52, 402–416. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.009

Belfield

C. R.

Levin

H. M.

(2007). The price we pay: Economic and social consequences of inadequate education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Belz

J. A.

Müller-Hartmann

(2003). Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional fault line. Modern Language Journal, 87, 71–89.

Burdette

Greer

P. L.

Woods

Kari

(2013). K-12 Online learning and students with disabilities: Perspectives from state special education directors. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17, 65–72.

Carr

(2000). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46, A39–A41. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/section/Home/5/?eio=34361

Carsen

(2016, 12 19). Alabama admits its high school graduation rate was inflated. National Public Radio Education. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2016/12/19/505729524/alabama-admits-its-high-school-graduation-rate-was-inflated

Cavanaugh

Gillan

K. J.

Kromrey

Hess

Blomeyer

(2004). The effects of distance education on K–12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.

10.

Cavanaugh

Repetto

Wayer

Spitler

(2013). Online learning for students with disabilities: A framework for success. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28, 1–8.

11.

Christensen

Horn

Johnson

(2008). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Crow

(2008). Four types of disabilities: Their impact on online learning. TechTrends, 52, 51–55.

13.

De la Varre

Irvin

M. J.

Jordan

A. W.

Hannum

W. H.

Farmer

T. W.

(2014). Reasons for student dropout in an online course in a rural K–12 setting. Distance Education, 35, 324–344. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.955259

14.

Dupin-Bryant

P. A.

(2004). Pre-entry variables related to retention in online distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 18, 199–206. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1804_2

15.

Dynarski

Clarke

Cobb

Finn

Rumberger

Smink

. (2008). Dropout prevention. IES practice guide. NCEE 2008-4025. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED502502.pdf

16.

Gabriel

(2011, 4 5). Rise in online classes flares debate about quality. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/06/education/06online.html

17.

Gemin

Pape

Vashaw

Watson

(2015). Keeping pace with K-12 digital learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Evergreen Education Group. Retrieved from http://www.kpk12.com/wp-content/uploads/Evergreen_KeepingPace_2015.pdf

18.

Gill

Walsh

Smither Wulsin

Matulewicz

Severn

Grau

… Kerwin

. (2015). Inside online charter schools. Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from https://www.mathematica-mpr.com/our-publications-and-findings/publications/inside-online-charter-schools

19.

Greer

D. L.

Crutchfield

S. A.

Woods

K. L.

(2013). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning, instructional design principles, and students with learning disabilities in computer-based and online learning environments. Journal of Education, 193, 41–50.

20.

Gross

Tuchman

Patrick

(2018). A national landscape scan of personalized learning in K-12 education in the United States. Vienna, VA: iNACOL.

21.

Hashey

A. I.

Stahl

(2014). Making online learning accessible for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 70–78.

22.

Heckman

J. J.

Lafontaine

P. A.

(2010). The American high school graduation rate: Trends and levels. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 244–262.

23.

Heissel

(2016). The relative benefits of live versus online delivery: Evidence from virtual algebra I in North Carolina. Economics of Education Review, 53, 99–115.

24.

Hellevik

(2009). Linear versus logistic regression when the dependent variable is a dichotomy. Quality & Quantity, 43, 59–74.

25.

Ingles

S. J.

Prat

D. J.

Herget

D. R.

Bryan

Fritch

L. B.

Ottem

… Wilson

(2015). High school longitudinal study of 2009 (HSLS:09) 2013 update and high school transcript data file documentation (No. NCES 2015-036). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015036.pdf

26.

International Association for K-12 Learning. (2013). The online learning definitions project. Retrieved from https://www.inacol.org/resource/the-online-learning-definitions-project/

27.

Kamenetz

Turner

(2016, 10 17). The high school graduation rate reaches a record high—Again. National Public Radio Education. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2016/10/17/498246451/the-high-school-graduation-reaches-a-record-high-again

28.

Lee

Choi

Kim

(2013). Discriminating factors between completers of and dropouts from online learning courses. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 44, 328–337.

29.

McFarland

Hussar

de Brey

Snyder

Wang

Wilkinson-Flicker

… Hinz

(2017). The condition of education 2017 (No. NCES 2017-144). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017144.pdf

30.

McFarland

Stark

Cui

(2016). Trends in high school dropout and completion rates in the United States: 2013 (No. NCES 2016-117). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016117rev.pdf

31.

McCleary

(2002). Using multiple imputation for analysis of incomplete data in clinical research. Nursing Research, 51, 339–343.

32.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Public high school 4-year adjusted cohort graduation rate (ACGR), by race/ethnicity and selected demographic characteristics for the United States, the 50 states, and the District of Columbia: School year 2015-16. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/tables/ACGR_RE_and_characteristics_2015-16.asp

33.

Patrick

Kennedy

Powell

(2013). Mean what you say: Defining and integrating personalized, blended and competency education. International association for K-12 online learning. Retrieved from https://www.inacol.org/resource/mean-what-you-say-defining-and-integrating-personalized-blended-and-competency-education/

34.

Phirangee

Malec

(2017). Othering in online learning: An examination of social presence, identity, and sense of community. Distance Education, 38, 160–172.

35.

Picciano

Seman

(2010). Class connections: High school reform and the role of online learning. Retrieved from https://www.inacol.org/resource/class-connections-high-school-reform-and-the-role-of-online-learning/

36.

Picciano

Seman

Day

(2011). Online learning in Illinois high schools: Has the time come? Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535142.pdf

37.

Qahmash

A. I. M.

(2018). The potentials of using mobile technology in teaching individuals with learning disabilities: A review of special education technology literature. TechTrends, 1–7. doi:10.1007/s11528-018-0298-1

38.

Repetto

Cavanaugh

Wayer

Liu

(2010). Virtual high schools: Improving outcomes for students with disabilities. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 11, 91–104.

39.

Roberts

J. B.

Crittenden

L. A.

Crittenden

J. C.

(2011). Students with disabilities and online learning: A cross-institutional study of perceived satisfaction with accessibility compliance and services. Internet & Higher Education, 14, 242–250.

40.

Rouse

C. E.

(2007). Quantifying the costs of inadequate education: Consequences of the labor market. In Belfield

C. R.

Levin

H. M.

(Eds.), The price we pay: Economic and Social consequences of inadequate education (pp. 99–124). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

41.

Royston

(2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. The Stata Journal, 4, 227–241.

42.

Rumberger

R. W.

(2011). Dropping out: Why students drop out of high school and what can be done about it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

43.

Shah

(2011). E-Learning access for special needs. Education Week, 31, S2–S4.

44.

Shea

C. S.

Pickett

(2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 175–190.

45.

Skårbrevik

K. J.

(2005). The quality of special education for students with special needs in ordinary classes. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 20, 387–401. Retrieved from http://10.0.4.56/08856250500268601

46.

Smith

S. J.

Basham

J. D.

(2014). Designing online learning opportunities for students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46, 127–137.

47.

Smith

Clark

Blomeyer

(2005). A synthesis of new research on K-12 online learning (p. 96). Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.

48.

Snart

(2017). Hybrid learning at the community college. New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2017, 59–67. Retrieved from http://10.0.3.234/tl.20227

49.

Sparks

S. D.

(2016). Many students “stop out” of high school, studies show. Education Week, 36, 7–7.

50.

Stark

Noel

A. M.

(2015). Trends in high school dropout and completion rates in the United States: 1972–2012 (No. NCES 2015-015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2015/2015015.pdf

51.

Sublett

Rumberger

(2017). Accounting for delayed high school graduates in California. California Dropout Research Project (Policy Report #22). Retrieved from http://cdrpsb.org/pubs_reports.htm

52.

Sum

Khatiwada

McLaughlin

(2009). The consequences of dropping out of high school: Joblessness and jailing for high school dropouts and the high cost for taxpayers. Center for Labor Market Studies. Retrieved from https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/downloads/neu:376324?datastream_id=content

53.

Tallent-Runnels

M. K.

Thomas

J. A.

Lan

W. Y.

Cooper

Ahern

T. C.

Shaw

S. M.

Liu

(2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76, 93–135. doi:10.3102/00346543076001093

54.

The Center on Online Learning and Students with Disabilities. (2016). Equity matters 2016: Digital & online learning for students with disabilities. Retrieved from http://www.centerononlinelearning.res.ku.edu/equity-matters-2016-digital-and-online-learning-for-students-with-disabilities/

55.

The Foundation for Blended and Online Learning and Evergreen Education Group. (2007). Why do students choose blended and online schools: The end of average requires personalized learning environments (no. The Foundation for Blended and Online Learning). Retrieved from http://www.blendedandonlinelearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/FBOL-Why-Students-Choose-Blended-Online-Schools-Jan-2017.pdf

56.

Tindle

East

Mellard

(2017). Online learning for students with disabilities: Considerations for SEA policies and procedures. Lawrence, KS: Center on Online Learning and Students with Disabilities.

57.

Watson

J. F.

Kalmon

(2005). Keeping pace with K–12 online learning: A review of state-level policy and practice. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. Retrieved August 4, 2011, from http://www.learningpt.org/pdfs/tech/Keeping_Pace2.pdf

58.

Watson

Murin

Vashaw

Gemin

Rapp

(2011). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning: An annual review of policy and practice. Evergreen, CO: Evergreen Education Group. Retrieved from https://www.evergreenedgroup.com/keeping-pace-reports/

59.

Wilkins

Huckabee

(2014). A literature map of dropout prevention interventions for students with disabilities. Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED571791

60.

Woodworth

J. L.

Raymond

M. E.

Chirbas

Gonzalez

Negassi

Snow

Van Donge

(2015). Online charter school study 2015. Retrieved from: https://virtualschooling.wordpress.com/2015/12/10/special-issue-of-journal-of-online-learning-research/

61.

Wojciechowski

Palmer

L. B.

(2005). Individual student characteristics: Can any be predictors of success in online classes? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8. Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/