Disability law and technology services share a rich history. This article investigates this transformative relationship through the contextual framework of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. A summary of legal cases, accommodation services, and barriers to access are explored. This includes an overview of the challenges facing technology as we develop the classrooms of the 21st century. A reflection of past rulings, technological advancements, and ongoing questions culminates in a look at where special education technology is heading.
Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
7.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
8.
CollinsA.HalversonR. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
9.
CurtisS. E. (2005). Parents and litigation: Insights from a special education law clinic. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 510.
DayJ. N.HuefnerD. S. (2003). Assistive technology: Legal issues for students with disabilities and their schools. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18, 23–34.
12.
EdyburnD. L. (2004). Rethinking assistive technology. Special Education Technology Practice, 5, 16–23.
13.
E.H. v. Tinozzi 16 IDELR 787, 16 LRP 761 (D. Conn., 1990).
14.
Eric M. v. North East Indep. School District, Comm’r Dec. No. 286-SE-495 (614, 1995).
15.
FoleyA.FerriB. A. (2012). Technology for people, not disabilities: Ensuring access and inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12, 192–200.
16.
GoldenD. (1998). Assistive technology in special education: Policy and practice. Albuquerque, NM: Council of Administrators of Special Education.
17.
Greater Albany Public School District, 32 IDELR 157 (SEA OR1999).
18.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (1997).
19.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
20.
Irene Y. v. Houston Indep. School District, Comm’r Dec. No. 153-SE-0102 (38, 2002).
21.
JohnM. & L. M., v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of Chicago, 52 IDELR 154 (N. D., IL2009).
22.
K.A. v. Fulton County School District, 62 IDELR 161 (11th Cir., 1220, 2013).
23.
LeeH.TempletonR. (2008). Ensuring equal access to technology: Providing assistive technology for students with disabilities. Theory into Practice, 47, 212–219.
24.
L.P. v Longmeadow Public Schools, 59 IDELR 169 (MA.2012).
25.
Miller, 565 F.3d 1232(10th Cir.2009).
26.
Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia, 348 F. Supp. 866 (D.D.C.1972).
27.
MullC. A.SitlingtonP. L. (2003). The role of technology in the transition to postsecondary education of students with learning disabilities a review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 26–32.
28.
M.M. v. San Ramon Valley Unified School District, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57395 (N.D. Cal. April 22, 2013).
29.
National Council on Disability. (2012). Rocking the cradle: Ensuring the rights of parents with disabilities and their children. Washington, DC: Author.
30.
NelsonL. L.RoseD. H. (2014). Design and deliver: Planning and teaching using universal design for learning. Baltimore, MD: Brooks Publishing.
31.
ParetteH. P.Peterson-KarlanG. R.SmithS.GrayT.Silver-PacuillaH. (2006). The state of assistive technology: Themes from an outcomes summit. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 3, 15–33.
32.
PasseyD.RogersC.MachellJ.MchughG. (2004), The motivational effect of ICT on pupils. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University, Department of Educational Research. DfES.
33.
Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 334 F. Supp. 1257 (E.D. Pa. 1971), 343 F. Supp. 279 (E.D. Pa.1972).
34.
President’s Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Jessup, MD: U.S. Department of Education.
35.
Regional School District no. 9 Bd. of Educ. v. Mr. & Mrs. P, State of Connecticut Department of Educ., 51 IDELR 241 (CT2009).
36.
ReynoldsD.TreharneD.TrippH. (2003). ICT: The hopes and the reality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 151–167.
37.
RoseD. H.MeyerA. (2000). The future is in the margins: The role of technology and disability in educational reform. A report prepared for the U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Technology. Washington, DC: USDOE.
38.
Sidney Public Schools, 110 LRP 19430 (SEA Neb.2010).
39.
Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988. Catalogue No. 850. (Senate Rpt. 100-438). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
