Anderson-InmanL.HorneyM. A. (2000). Transforming text for at-risk readers. InReinkingD.McKennaM. C.LabboL. D.KiefflerR. (Eds.) Handbook of literacy and technology. Transformations in a post-typographical world (pp. 15–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
Anderson-InmanL. (2005). National Center for the Study of Supported Electronic Text. Grant proposal submitted to the United States Department of Education, Office of Special Education Services. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
3.
Avi (2004). Crispin: The cross of lead. New York: Hyperion Books.
BiermanP. (2006, May). Reconsidering the textbook. Paper presented at Reconsidering the Textbook Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy of the Sciences.
6.
BooneR.HigginsK. (2003). Reading, writing, and publishing digital text. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 132–140.
7.
HigginsE. L.RaskindM. H. (1997). The compensatory effectiveness of optical character recognition/speech synthesis on the reading comprehension of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 75–87.
8.
KerscherG.FruchtermanJ. (2002). The soundproof book: Exploration of rights conflict and access to commercial Ebooks for people with disabilities. First Monday, 7(6), retrieved October 26, 2006, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_6/kerscher/index.html.
9.
MyersM. P.SavageT. (2005). Enhancing student comprehension of social studies material. The Social Studies, 96(1), 18–24.
NormanD. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. New York: Addison-Wesley.
12.
OakesJ.SaundersM. (2004). Education's most basic tool: Access to textbooks and instructional materials in California's public schools. Teachers College Record, 106, 1967–1988.
13.
OkoloC. M. (2006). Using video to teach content-area information: How can the web help teacher?Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(3), 48–51.
14.
PerlE. S. (2002). Federal and state legislation regarding accessible materials. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Education Curriculum. Retrieved October 25, 2006, from http://www.cast.org/publications/ncac/ncac_policy.hthm#report3.
15.
RoseD. H.MeyerA. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Washington, DC: Association for the Supervision and Curriculum Development.
16.
StahlS. (2003). The NFF: A national file format for accessible instructional materials. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(2), 65–67.
TwymanT.TindalG. (2006). Using a computer-adapted, conceptually based history text to increase comprehension and problem-solving skills of students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 5–16.