BoardmanA.G.ArguellesM.E.VaughnS.HughesM.T.KlingnerJ. (2005). Special education teachers' views of research-based practices. Journal of Special Education, 39(3), 168–180.
2.
EdyburnD.L. (2000). 1999 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 7–18.
3.
EdyburnD.L. (2001). 2000 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(2), 5–25.
4.
EdyburnD.L. (2002). 2001 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(2), 5–24.
5.
EdyburnD.L. (2003). 2002 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18(3), 5–28.
6.
EdyburnD.L. (2004). 2003 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(4), 57–80.
7.
FuchsD.FuchsL. (2005). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A blueprint for practitioners, policymakers, and parents. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 57–61.
8.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 28(4), 249–260.
9.
OkoloC.M. (2005). Technology and social studies instruction for students with mild disabilities. InEdyburnD.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 623–641). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.
VaughnS.FuchsL.S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 137–146.