This study examined parental preference of play outcomes and selection of toys and assistive technology used in meeting the identified outcomes for children, birth to 3, with developmental delays. Additionally, parent satisfaction related to how well selected materials assisted their child in meeting play outcomes was measured. Participants included families receiving assistive technology services to support play as part of an Early Intervention Program. Parents most often stated an interest in increasing play options as a play outcome for their child. Additionally, parents most often chose low-tech, off-the-shelf toys that encouraged functional play to help their child meet identified play outcomes, although no difference in satisfaction levels by type of toy was noted. Conclusions point to a need for interventionists and parents to encourage a variety of play through a variety of toys for children with special needs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BehrmannM. M.JonesJ. K.WildsM. L. (1997). Technology intervention for very young children with disabilities. InBlackmanJ.A. (Ed.), Technology in early intervention (pp.10–23). Gaithersburg, MA: Aspen Publications.
2.
BehrmannM. M.LahmE. (1984). Babies and robots: Technology to assist learning. Rehabilitation Literature, 45, 194–201.
3.
BradleyR. H. (1985). Social-Cognitive development and toys. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5(3), 11–30.
4.
BrodinJ. (1999). Play in children with severe multiple disabilities: Play with toys: A review. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 46(1), 25–34.
5.
BrunerJ.SherwoodV. (Eds.) (1976). Play: Its role in development and evolution. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin.
6.
ChanceP. (1979). Learning through play. New York: Gardner Press.
7.
ChristensenK. E.StockdaleD. F. (1991). Predictors of toy selection criteria of preschool children's parents. Children's Environments Quarterly, 8(1), 25–36.
8.
Clarke-StewartK. (1973). Interactions between mothers and their young children: Characteristics and consequences. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 8.
9.
DanielsL. E.SparlingJ. W.ReillyM.HumphryR. (1995). Use of assistive technology with young children with severe and profound disabilities. Infant-Toddler Intervention, 5, 91–112.
FallonM. A.HarrisM. B. (1989). Factors influencing the selection of toys for handicapped and normally developing preschool children. Journal of Genetic Psychology. 150, 125–134.
12.
GarveyC. (1990). Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
GlassyD.RomanoJ. (2003). Selecting appropriate toys for young children: The pediatrician's role. Pediatrics. 111(4), 911–913.
14.
GowenJ. W.Johnson-MartinN.GoldmanB. D.HusseyB. (1992). Object play and exploration in children with and without developmental disabilities: A longitudinal study. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 97(1), 21–38.
15.
HanzlikJ. R. (1989). The effect of intervention on the free-play experience for mothers and their infants with developmental delay and cerebral palsy. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 9(2), 33–51.
16.
HowesC.StewardP. (1987). Child's play with adults, toys, and peers: An examination of family and child-care influences. Child Development, 23(3), 423–430.
17.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 2004, P.L. 108–446.
18.
JudgeS. L.ParetteH. P. (Eds.) (1998). Assistive technology for young children with disabilities. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
19.
LaneS. J.MistrettS. G. (1996). Play and assistive technology issues for infants and young children with disabilities: A preliminary examination. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 11(2), 96–104.
20.
LewisJ. M. (1993). Childhood play in normality, pathology, and therapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63, 6–15.
21.
LinderT. W. (1993). Transdisciplinary play-based assessment: A functional approach to working with young children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
22.
MackW.LinquistJ.E.ParhamD.L. (1982). A synthesis of occupational behavior and sensory integration concepts in theory and practice, part 1: Theoretical foundations. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 36, 365–374.
23.
MaloneD. M.LangoneJ. (1999). Teaching object-related play skills to preschool children with developmental concerns. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 46(3), 325–336.
24.
MistrettS. G. (2001). Let's Play! Project final report (Final Report to OSERS, No. H024B50051). Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo, Center for Assistive Technology.
25.
MistrettS, (2004). Assistive technology helps young children with disabilities participate in daily activities. Technology and Media Division, 1(4), 1–8.
26.
MistrettS. G.RaimondiS. L.BarnettM. P. (1990). The use of technology with preschoolers with handicaps. Buffalo, NY: Preschool Integration through Technology Systems.
27.
MuñozJ.P. (1986). The significance of fostering play development in handicapped children. In Play: A skill for life (pp. 1–12). Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
28.
ParetteH. P. (1990). A question of assistive technology and services for young children with physical disabilities. Project TAARK. Little Rock, AR: Arkansas University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services N0. ED 331212).
29.
PiagetJ. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.
30.
RobinsonA. L. (1977). Play the arena for acquisition of rules for competent behavior. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 3, 248–253.
31.
RodgerS.ZivianiJ. (1999). Play based occupational therapy. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 46(3), 337–364.
32.
RubinK.HoweN. (1985). Toys and play behaviors: An overview. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5(3), 1–9.
33.
SchillerP. H. (1957) Innate motor action as a basis of learning. InSchillerC.H. (Ed.), Instinctive behavior (pp. 264–287). New York: International Universities Press.
34.
SwinthY.AnsonD.DietzJ. (1993). Single switch computer access for infants and toddlers. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47, 1031–1038.
35.
TakataN. (1971). The play milieu-a preliminary appraisal. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25, 281–284.
36.
VygotskyL. (1976). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. InBrunerJ.JollyA.SylvaK. (Eds.), Play: It's role in development and evolution (pp. 537–544). New York: Basic Books.
37.
WachsT. (1976). Utilization of a Piagetian approach in the investigation of early experience effects: A research strategy and some illustrative data. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 22, 11–29.
38.
WachsT. (1978). The relationship of infants' physical development to their Binet performance at 2 ½ years. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1, 51–65.
39.
WhaleyK. K. (1990). The emergence of social play in infancy: A proposed developmental sequence of infant-adult social play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5, 347–358.
40.
WhiteheadA.JesienG.UlanskiB. K. (1998). Weaving parents into the fabric of early intervention interdisciplinary training: How to integrate and support family involvement in training. Infants and Young Children, 10(3), 44–53.
41.
WildsM. L. (1989). Effective use of technology with young children. NICHCY News Digest, 13, 6–7.
42.
WilliamsS.E.MatesiD.V. (1988). Therapeutic intervention with an adapted toy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42(10), 673–676.
43.
YawkeyT. D.Toro-LopezJ. A. (1985). Examining descriptive and empirically based typologies of toys for handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5(3), 47–58.
