Assistive Technology Outcomes Measurement System. (2001–2003). About the ATOMS project. Retrieved May 12, 2005, from http://www.uwm.edu/CHS/atoms/about/.
2.
BattleD. E. (2002). Communication disorders in multicultural populations (3rd ed.) Boston: Andover Medical.
3.
BriegelA. R. (2000). Assistive technology assessment: More than the device. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35, 237–243.
4.
CampbellP.AlgozzineB. (2005). Using technology to enhance collaboration to benefit all students. In InEdyburnD. L.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.), The handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 747–776). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.
EdyburnD. L. (2005). Assistive technology and students with mild disabilities: From consideration to outcome measurement. InEdyburnD.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 239–270). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.
8.
EdyburnD. L. (2000). 1999 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(1), 7–18.
9.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
10.
LenkerJ. A.SchererM. J.FuhrerM. J.JutaiJ. W.DeRuyterF. (2005). Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology outcomes research. Assistive Technology, 17, 7–22.
11.
LevinD.ArafehS. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between internet-savvy students and their schools. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
12.
National Assistive Technology Research Institute. (2001–2003). NATRI home page. Retrieved May 6, 2005, from http://natri.uky.edu/.
13.
ParetteH. P. (2004, April). Millennial children in a digital age: Assistive technology futures in special education. Paper presented to the Council for Exceptional Children Annual Convention and Expo, New Orleans.
14.
ParetteH. P.Peterson-KarlanG. R. (in press). The state of assistive technology services nationally and implications for future development. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits.
15.
ParetteH. P.BrothersonM. J.HuerM. B. (2000). Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35(2), 177–190.
16.
ParetteH. P.HuerM. B.BrothersonM. J. (2001). Related service personnel perceptions of team AAC decision-making across cultures. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36(1), 69–82.
17.
ParetteH. P.HuerM. B.SchererM. (2004). Effects of acculturation on assistive technology service delivery. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(2), 31–41.
18.
ParetteH. P.HuerM. B.VanBiervlietA. (2005). Cultural issues and assistive technology. InEdyburnD. L.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.), The handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 81–103). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.
SmithS. J.AllsoppD. (2005). Technology and inservice professional development: Integrating an effective medium to bridge research to practice. InEdyburnD. L.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.), The handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 777–792). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.
21.
SotoG.HuerM. B.TaylorO. (1997). Multicultural issues. InLloydL. L.FullerD. H.ArvidsonH. H. (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 406–413). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
22.
SueD. W.ArredondoP.McDavisR. J. (1992). Multicultural counseling competencies and standards: A call to the profession. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 20, 64–88.
23.
SueD.W.BernierY.DurranA.FeinbergL.PedersenP.B.SmithE. J.Vasquez-NuttalE. (1982). Position paper: Cross-cultural counseling competencies. The Counseling Psychologist, 10, 45–52.
24.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (2002). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Washington, DC: Author. Retrievd May 12, 2005, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/.
25.
VanBiervlietA.ParetteH. P. (1999). Families, cultures, and AAC [CD-ROM]. Little Rock, AR: Southeast Missouri State University and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.
ZabalaJ. S.CarlD. F. (2005). Quality indicators for assistive technology services in schools. InEdyburnD. L.HigginsK.BooneR. (Eds.), The handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 179–207). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design, Inc.