Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

With technological advances and growth in availability of assistive technology, infants and toddlers with disabilities have many more options than they had previously. Professionals that serve this population are required by law to consider assistive technology for each child with a disability that they serve. This study examines the factors that impact the decisions made about assistive technology by the professionals that serve them through the Kentucky First Steps Program. Fifteen of 16 professionals approved to provide assistive technology services in Kentucky were interviewed. An analysis of the differences in experience, philosophy, and beliefs of the participants by discipline provide insight into the process of decision making and the implications they have on the implementation of assistive technology. The analysis revealed several contradictions. While appearing to be philosophically aligned, the participants delivered assistive technology services in many different ways. Teaming was espoused as an important component of service delivery but was frequently not implemented. Family members were not seen as important members of these teams but client goals were rated as extremely important factors in making decisions about assistive technology. Parents and professionals need to be aware of the differences between disciplines and delivery strategies to assure a complete and balanced look at the whole child.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angelo

Bunning

M. E.

Schmeler

, & Doster

(1997). Identifying best practice in the occupational therapy assistive technology evaluation: An analysis of three focus groups. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 51, 916–920.

Armstrong

, & Jones

(1995, June). Using family dreams to develop meaningful goals involving assistive technology. [On-line]. Retrieved from http://www.closingthegap.com/library/June-3-July95/armstrong.html.

Behrmann

M. M.

, & Schepis

M. M.

(1994). Assistive technology assessment: A multiple case study of three approaches with students with physical disabilities during the transition from school to work. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 4(3), 202–210.

Blackhurst

A. E.

, & Berdine

W.H.

(Eds.). (1993). An introduction to special education (3rd ed.). New York HarperCollins.

Blackhurst

A. E.

Lahm

E. A.

Harrison

E. M.

, & Chandler

W. G.

(1999). A framework for aligning technology with transition competencies. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 22(2), 153–183.

Bowen

R. E.

(1996). Should occupational therapy adopt a consumer-based model of service delivery? American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 899–902.

Cook

A. M.

, & Hussey

S. M.

(1995). Assistive technologies: Principles and practice. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

Deterding

Youngstrom

M. J.

, & Dunn

(1991). Position paper: Occupational therapy and assistive technology. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(12), 1076.

Education for All Handicapped Children Act, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq. (1975).

10.

Fuhrer

M. J.

(1995). An agenda for medical rehabilitation outcomes research. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 243–248.

11.

Grigley

(1998). Tapping the power of assistive technology. OT Week, 12(25), 12–13.

12.

Hobson

, & Trefler

(1995). Rehabilitation engineering technologies: Principles of application. Pittsburg, PA: CRC Press.

13.

Holder-Brown

, & Parette

(1992). Children with disabilities who use assistive technology: Ethical considerations. Young Children, 47(6), 73–77.

14.

Hutinger

Johanson

, & Stoneburner

(1996). Assistive technology applications in educational programs of children with multiple disabilities: A case study report on the state of the practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(1), 16–35.

15.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1986, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq. (1986).

16.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq. (1997).

17.

Kelligrew

, & Alien

(1996). Occupational therapy in full-inclusion classrooms: A case study from the Moorpark Model. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 718–723.

18.

Kentucky Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardaton Services. (2001a). First Steps: Kentucky Early Intervention Service: Guide to services. [On-line] Retrieved from http://dmhmrs.chr.state.ky.us/mr/firststeps/guide.asp.

19.

Kentucky Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardaton Services. (2001b). First Steps: Kentucky Early Intervention Service: Policy and procedures manual. [On-line] Retrieved from http://dmhmrs.chrstate.ky.us/mr/firststeps/mantoc.asp.

20.

King

T. W.

(1999). Assistive technology: Essential human factors. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

21.

Lange

M. L.

(1997). Focus on technology. OT Practice, 2(5), 51–52.

22.

Melichar

, & Blackhurst

A. E.

(1991). Introduction to a functional approach to assistive technology: A national assistive technology training series (NATTS) module. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation Counseling.

23.

McGregor

, & Pachuski

(1996). Assistive technology in schools: Are teachers ready, able, and supported? Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 4–15.

24.

Morris

(1991). Facilitation of learning. In Langely

M. B.

, & Lombardino

L. J.

, (Eds.), Neurodevelopmental strategies for managing communication disorders in children with severe motor dysfunction (pp. 251–295). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.

25.

Parette

H. P.

(1995, November). Culturally sensitive family-focused assistive technology assessment strategies. Paper presented at the DEC Early Childhood Conference on Children with Special Needs, Orlando, FL.

26.

Parette

H. P.

& Brotherson

M. J.

(1996). Family participation in assistive technology assessment for young children with mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 29–43.

27.

Proffit

, & Combs

(1998, July). IDEA Reauthorized. Paper presented at the administration meeting of Clay County Board of Education Staff, Manchester, KY.

28.

Rainforth

York

, & MacDonald

(1992). Collaborative teams for students with severe disabilities: Integrating therapy and educational services. Baltimore: Brookes.

29.

Scherer

(1994). Matching person and technology: A series of assessments for selecting and evaluating technologies used in rehabilitation, education, the workplace, and other settings. Unpublished manuscript.

30.

Scherer

M. J.

(2000). living in the state of stuck (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.

31.

Struck

(1996). Computer access: A link to classroom learning. OT Practice, 1(8), 18–25.

32.

Swinth

(1996). Evaluating toddlers for assistive technology. OT Practice, 1(3), 32–40.

Factors that Influence Assistive Technology Decision Making

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References