This study investigated spell check programs to determine how they differ in producing target words in first position in the replacement list for misspellings generated by students with learning disabilities. A pool of 1,008 misspellings taken from 111 writing samples generated by students with learning disabilities, grades three through eight, were spell checked by the spell check function of nine word processing software programs. Misspellings were classified by the level of phonetic mismatch to the target word (phonetic error level) and the proportion of correct two-letter sequences (bigram ratio). A significant difference was found among spell checkers in their ability to produce target words first in the replacement list. In addition, a significant difference with respect to phonetic error level and bigram ratio was found. Efficiency of spell checkers increased as the phonetic error level or the bigram ratio of the misspellings increased. These results suggest that spell checkers are overall ineffective in producing target words first in the replacement list for misspellings generated by students with learning disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AugustG. J., & GarfinkelB. D. (1990). Comorbidity of ADHD and leading disability among clinic-referred children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 29–45.
2.
BalletL. L. (1990). Spelling rule usage among students with learning disabilities and normally achieving students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 121–128.
3.
BailetL. L., & LyonG. R. (1985). Deficient linguistic rule application in a learning disabled speller: A case study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 162–165.
4.
Bank street writer III. (1992). [Computer software]. New York: Scholastic Software.
5.
BeersJ. W. (1980). Developmental strategies of spelling competence in primary school children. In HendersonE. H. & BeersJ. W. (Eds.), Developmental and cognitive aspects of learning to spell (pp. 36–45). Newark, DL: International Beading Association.
6.
CarlisleJ. F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning-disabled and normal students. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 90–108.
7.
CohenM. J.RiccioC. A., & GonzalezJ. J. (1994). Methodological differences in the diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Impact on prevalence. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2, 31–38.
CrealockC., & SitkoM. (1990). Comparison between computer and handwriting technologies in writing training with learning disabled students. International Journal of Special Education, 5, 173–183.
10.
DaltonB.WinburyN. E., & MoroccoC. C. (1990). “If you could just push a button”: Two fourth grade boys with learning disabilities learn to use a computer spelling checker. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 177–191.
11.
EnglertC. S.HiebertE. H., & StewartS. R. (1985). Spelling unfamiliar words by an analogy strategy. Journal of Special Education, 19, 291–306.
12.
FergusonG. A., & TakaneY. (1989). Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
GammonG. H. (1989). Sunburst's 1 school speller. Spell checking for Magic Slate II. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 13, 189–193.
14.
GerlachG. J.JohnsonJ. R., & OuyangR. (1991). Using an electronic speller to correct misspelled words and verify correctly spelled words. Reading Improvement, 28, 188–194.
15.
GlazerS. M., & CurryD. (1988). Word processing programs: Survival tools for children with writing problems. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 4, 187–199.
16.
JinkersonL., & BaggettP. (1993). Spell checkers: Aids in identifying and correcting spelling errors. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 4, 291–306.
17.
KerchnerL. B., & KistingerB. J. (1984). Language processing/word processing: Written expression, computers and learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 329–335.
18.
LeuenbergerJ., & MorrisM. (1990). Analysis of spelling errors by learning disabled and normal college students. Learning Disabilities Focus, 5, 103–118.
19.
MacArthurC. A. (1996). Using technology to enhance the writing processes of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 344–354.
20.
MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.HaynesJ. B., & DeLaPazS. (1996). Spell checkers and students with learning disabilities: Performance comparisons and impact on spelling. Journal of Special Education, 30, 35–57.
21.
McNaughtonD.HughesC., & OfieshN. (1997). Proofreading for students with learning disabilities: Integrating computer and strategy use. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 12, 16–28.
22.
Microsoft Word. (1994). (Version 6.0 for DOS). [Computer software]. Bothell, WA: Microsoft Corporation.
23.
Microsoft Works. (1992). (Version 4.0). [Computer software]. Bothell, WA: Microsoft Corporation.
24.
MittonR. (1987). Spelling checkers, spelling correctors and the misspellings of poor spellers. Information Processing & Management, 23, 495–505.
25.
MontgomeryD. J., & MastropieriM. A. (1995). A qualitative analysis of the writing process and use of technology by college students with learning disabilities. Unpublished raw data.
26.
OlsonJ. L., & PlattJ. M. (1996). Teaching children and adolescents with special needs (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27.
OuthredL. (1989). Word processing: Its impact onchildren's writing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 262–264.
28.
PenningtonB. F.McCabeL. L.SmithS. D.LeflyD. L.BookmanM. O.KimberlingW. J., & LubsH. A. (1986). Spelling errors in adults with a form of familial dyslexia. Child Development, 57, 1001–1013.
Semrud-ClikemanM.BiedermanJ.Sprich-BuckminsterS.LehmanB. K.FaraoneS. V., & NormanD. (1992). Comorbidity between ADDH and learning disability: A review and report in a clinically referred sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 439–448.
TarnowskiK. J.PrinzR. J., & NayS. M. (1986). Comparative analysis of attentional deficits in hyperactive and learning-disabled children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 341–345.
33.
WagnerM.BlackorbyJ., & HebbelerK. (1993). Beyond the report card: The multiple dimensions of secondary school performance of students with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park: SRI International.
34.
WordPerfect for windows. (1992). (Version 5.2) [Computer software]. Orem, UT. WordPerfect Corporation.
35.
Write this way. (1993). [Computer software]. San Diego, CA: Hartley Courseware, Inc.
36.
Write outloud. (1993). [Computer software]. Wauconda, IL: Don Johnston Developmental Equipment, Inc.
37.
ZentallS. S. (1990). Fact-retrieval automatization and math problem solving by learning disabled, attention-disordered, and normal adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 856–865.
38.
ZentallS. S. (1993). Research on the educational implications of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Exceptional Children, 60, 143–153.
