For decades, educators have searched for answers to explain the persistent and pervasive underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education. In too many school districts, arbitrary cutoff scores on standardized tests and lack of teacher referral are major barriers to the participation of minority students in gifted education. School districts have several options and alternatives for increasing the participation on underrepresented groups in gifted education. One option is to adopt the Schoolwide Enrichment Model. With its focus on talent development, this philosophy and educational approach opens doors to minority students who—for too long—have been shut out of gifted education. The SEM is a model of opportunity, excellence, and equity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeaneJ. A. (1990). Affect in the curriculum: Toward democracy, dignity, and diversity. New York: Teachers College Press.
2.
BeaneJ. A. (1995). Introduction: What is a coherent curriculum? In BeaneJ. A. (Ed.), Toward a coherent curriculum. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3.
FordD. Y. (1994). The recruitment and retention of Black students in gifted programs. Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
4.
FordD. Y. (1995). Counseling gifted Black students: Underachievement, identity, and social and emotional well-being. Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
5.
FordD. Y. (1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students: Promising practices and programs. New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
ForgioneP. D.Jr. (1998). What we've learned from TIMSS about science education in the United States: Address to the 1998 Conference of the National Science Teachers Association. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U. S. Department of Education.
7.
FrasierM. (1991, Fall). Eliminating four barriers to the identification of gifted minority students. Update on Gifted Education, 2–10.
8.
BensonHale J. (1986). Black children: Their roots, culture, and learning styles. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
9.
HarrisJ. J.IIIFordD. Y. (1991). Identifying and nurturing the promise of gifted Black students. Journal of Negro Education, 60(1), 3–18.
10.
KozolJ. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: HarperPerennial.
11.
LevinH. M. (1990). The educationally disadvantaged are still among us. In BainJ. G.HermanJ. L. (Eds.), Making schools work for underachieving minority students (pp. 3–11). New York, Greenwood.
12.
MacLeodJ. (1996). Ain't no makin' it: Leveled aspirations in low-income neighborhood (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.
13.
PurkeyW. W.NovakM. (1996). Inviting school success: A self-concept approach to teaching, learning, and democratic practice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
14.
ResnickL. B.KlopferL. E. (1989). Toward the thinking curriculum: An overview. In ResnickL. B.KlopferL. E. (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 1–18. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
15.
RenzulliJ. S. (1999). What is this thing called giftedness, and how do we develop it? A twenty-five year perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 3–54.
16.
ShadeB. J. (1994). Understanding the African American learner. In HollinsE. R.KingJ. E.HaymanW. C. (Eds.), Teaching diverse populations: Formulating a knowledge base (pp. 175–189. New York: State University of New York.
17.
SilbermanM. (1996). Active learning: 101 strategies to teach any subject. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
SternbergR. J. (1997, Dec. 3). A waste of talent. Education Week on the Web, 1–3.
19.
SuskindR. (1998). A hope in the unseen: An American odyssey from the inner city to Ivy League. New York: Broadway.
20.
TatumB. D. (1997). “Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?” and other conversations about race. New York: Basic Books.
21.
U. S. Department of Education. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
22.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (1997). Excellence as a standard for all education. Roeper Review, 20, 9–12.
23.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (1998). The development of academic talent: The mandate for educational best practice. Phi Delta Kappan.
