Since Bem's (1974) formulation of androgyny, numerous research efforts have focused on the relationship between gender identity and self esteem. These efforts have tested the descriptive adequacy of the hypothesized relationship between gender identity and self esteem (Whitley, 1983). The present study examines the relationship between a circumscribed aspect of gender identity, self perceptions of socioaffective traits, as measured by the Personal Attributes Questionnaire (PAQ) and of social self esteem as measured by the Texas Social Behavioral Inventory (TSBI), over a 14-month period among a sample of gifted and talented female adolescents (n=260). The results of typological and regression analyses reveal that: 1) substantial variability in classification group membership occurs over time; 2) the relationship between classification group membership and social self esteem remains relatively stable; and 3) self perceptions of stereotypically masculine instrumentality consistently emerges as the central contributor to social self esteem. Implications for counseling gifted and talented female adolescents wrestling with issues of gender-relevant self-perceptions, achievement and social self esteem are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllisonP. D. (1977). Testing for interaction in multiple regression.American Journal of Sociology, 83, 144–153.
2.
AntillJ. K. & CunninghamJ. D. (1979). Self esteem as a function of masculinity in both sexes.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 783–785.
3.
BeckerH. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance.New York: Free Press.
4.
BemS. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
5.
BemS. L. (1977). On the utility of alternate procedures for assessing psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196–205.
6.
CohenJ. (1978). Partialed products are interactions; partialed vectors are curve components.Psychological Bulletin, 85, 858–866.
7.
EricksonK. T. (1962). Notes on the sociology of deviance.Social Problems, 9, 307–314.
8.
FlemingE., HollingerC. (1979). Project Choice: Creating her options in career exploration.Boston: Educational Development Corporation.
9.
FlemingJ. S., & WattsW. A. (1980). The dimensionality of self esteem: Some results for a college sample.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 921–929.
10.
FoxL. H. (1977). Sex difference: Implications for program planning for the academically gifted. In StanleyJ. C., GeorgeW. C., and SolanoC. H. (Eds.), The gifted and the creative: A fifty-year perspective.Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
GottfredsonL. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations.Journal of Counseling Psychology Monograph, 28, 545–579.
12.
HelmreichR., & StappJ. (1974). Short forms of the Texas Social Behavior Inventory, an objective measure of self esteem.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 473–475.
13.
HelmreichR., SpenceJ., & HolahanC. (1979). Psychological androgyny and sex role flexibility: A test of two hypotheses.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1631–1644.
14.
HelmreichR. L., SpenceJ. T., & WilhelmJ. A. (1981). A psychonomic analysis of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire.Sex Roles, 7(11), 1097–1108.
15.
HodgsonJ. W. (1977). Sex differences in processes of identity and intimacy development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
16.
HornerM. S. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievement related conflicts in women.Journal of Social Issues, 28, 157–175.
17.
JersildA. T. (1952). In search of self.New York: Teachers College Bureau of Publications.
18.
JonesW. H., ChernovetzM. E. D., & HanssonR. O. (1978). The enigma of androgyny: Differential implications for males and females?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(6), 1574–1576.
19.
KeatingD. P. (Ed.). (1976). Intellectual talent: Research and development.Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
KellyJ. A., FurmanW., & YoungV. (1978). Problems associated with the typological measurement of sex roles and androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(6), 1574–1576.
21.
KellyJ. A., & WorellJ. (1974). New formulations of sex roles and androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 1101–115.
22.
KennyD. A. (1979). Correlation and causality.New York: Wiley.
23.
LamertE. M. (1967). Human deviance, social problems, and social control.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
24.
LamkeL. K. (1982). Adjustment and sex role orientation in adolescence.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 11(3), 247–259.
25.
LivesleyW. J., & BromleyD. B. (1973). Person perception in childhood and adolescence.London: Wiley.
26.
LubinskiD., TllegenA., & ButcherJ. (1981). The relationship between androgyny and subjective indicators of emotional well-being.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 722–730.
27.
MarciaJ. E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In AdelsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology.New York: Wiley.
28.
MarlandS. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the Commissioner of Education, Washington. D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29.
O'ConnorK., MannD. W., & BarwickJ. M. (1978). Androgyny and self esteem in the upper-middle class: A replication of Spence.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 1168–1169.
30.
RodensteinJ., PflegerL., & ColangeloN. (1977). Career development needs of the gifted: Special consideration for gifted women.Gifted Child Quarterly, 20, 340–347.
31.
RosenbergM. (1979). Conceiving the self.New York: Basic Books.
32.
SearsP. S. (1963). Self concept in the service of educational goals.California Journal for Instructional Improvement, 6, 3–12.
33.
ShavelsonR. J., HubnerJ. J., & StantonG. C. (1976). Self concept: Validation of construct interpretations.Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441.
34.
SilvernL. E., & RyanV. L. (1979). Self-rated adjustment and sex-typing on the Bern Sex Role Inventory: Is masculinity the primary predictor of adjustment?Sex Roles, 5, 739–763.
35.
SpenceJ., & HelmreichR. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents.Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
36.
SpenceJ., & HelmreichR. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 147–163.
37.
SpenceJ. T., & HelmreichR. L. (1981). Androgyny versus gender schema: A comment on Bem's gender schema theory.Psychological Review, 88(4), 365–368.
38.
SpenceJ. T., HelmreichR., & StappJ. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity.Journal Supplement Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43 (MS. NO 617).
39.
SpenceJ. T., HelmreichR., & StappJ. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relationship to self esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.
40.
Van den DaeleL. (1968). A developmental study of the ego ideal.Genetic Psychology Monographs, 78, 191–256.
41.
WellsK. (1980). Gender-role identity and psychological adjustment in adolescence.journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9, 59–73.
42.
WhitleyB. E. (1983). Sex-role orientation and self esteem: A critical meta-analytic review.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765–778.
43.
WylieRuth C. (1974). The self concept: Vol. 1 A review of methodological considerations and measuring instruments.Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
