Two types of critical theories have increasingly been used to understand LGBTQ+ individuals and persons with disabilities: Queer and Crip theories. Queer Crip theory can be used to analyze elements (e.g., traits, behaviors, contexts, and skills) of the lives of gifted and talented LGBTQ+ youth who also have disabilities, as those elements have recently appeared in the professional literature, the popular press, and the LGBTQ+ press. This piece reviews the definitions of Queer and Crip theories as well as the prevalence and challenges of persons who are gifted and LGBTQ+ with disabilities. The article critically examines eight different groups of frequently seen gifted LGBTQ+ students with disabilities. Gifted LGBTQ+ youth with learning, emotional/behavioral, hearing, vision, orthopedic, health, speech/language, and autism spectrum challenges are examined for these groups’ distinctive definitions, constituent groups, famous individuals, educational masks and solutions, and social-emotional solutions emanating from students’ queer identities. In the spirit of Queer Crip theory, conclusions encourage gifted LGBTQ+ youth with disabilities and their educators to consider carefully the future challenges—and joys—that may be involved in implementing the suggested educational and queer identity approaches.
ArshadM.FitzgeraldM. (2004). Did Michelangelo (1475–1564) have high-functioning autism?Journal of Medical Biography, 12(2), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/096777200401200212
BaumS. M.SchraderR.OwenS. V. (2017). To be gifted and learning disabled: Strength-based strategies for helping twice-exceptional students with LD, ADHD, ASD, and more (3rd ed.). Prufrock Press.
5.
BlighA. (2004). Review of “Queer Crips: Disabled gay men and their stories.”. Disability Studies Quarterly, 24(4), 518. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v24i3.518
BorlandJ. (2004). Issues and practices in the identification and education of gifted students from underrepresented groups. In The national research center on the gifted and talented. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED485164.pdf
CharlsonE.StrongM.GoldR. (1992). How successful deaf teenagers experience and cope with isolation. American Annals of the Deaf, 7(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2012.0447
12.
CheeC. L.ShortyG.KurpiusS. E. R. (2019). Academic stress of Native American undergraduates: The role of ethnic identity, cultural congruity, and self-beliefs. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000094
CrenshawK. (2019). On intersectionality: Essential writings. New Press.
15.
DavisJ. L. (2004). Did Michelangelo have Autism? Aloof, obsessed, self-absorbed -- Yet one of history’s greatest artists. https://prince.org/msg/100/96189
16.
de LauretisT. (1991). Queer theory: Lesbian and gay sexualities. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 3(2). iii–xviii. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-3-2-iii
DuBoisW. E. B. (1903/2017). The souls of Black folks. 12th Media Services.
19.
DunbarP. L. (1895). Majors and minors: Poems. Hadley and Hadley.
20.
FletcherL. Y.SacksA. (1990). Lavender lists: New lists for gay and lesbian readers. Alyson.
21.
FleuryP.MacNeilB.PflaumM. (1981). Media design for the gifted hearing impaired. American Annals for the Deaf, 156(6), 715–721. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2012.1355
22.
FordD. Y.KingR. A.Jr. (2014). No Blacks allowed: Segregated gifted education in the context of Brown v. Board of Education. The Journal of Negro Education, 83(3), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.83.3.0300
23.
FriedrichsT. P. (2001). Distinguishing characteristics of gifted students with disabilities. Prufrock Press.
FriedrichsT. P. (2018). Curricular opportunities for gifted GLBTQ students. In FriedrichsT. P.ManzellaT. R.SeneyR. W. (Eds.), Needs and approaches for educators and parents of gifted gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender students (pp. 17–24). National Association for Gifted Children.
27.
FriedrichsT. P. (2021). Supporting gifted LGBT students along paths to freedom. In CrossT. L.CrossJ. R. (Eds.), Handbook for counselors serving students with gifts and talents (2nd ed., pp. 153–174). Routledge.
LerouxJ. A. (1989). An exceptional success: A case study of a gifted young woman. Gifted Education International, 6(1), 28–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142948900600107
LuczakR. (1993). Eyes of desire: A gay deaf reader. Alyson.
52.
MacKenzieS. H.SonJ. S.EitelK. (2018). Using outdoor adventure to enhance intrinsic motivation and engagement in science and physical activity: An exploratory study. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 21, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2018.01.008
53.
MakerC. J. (1977). Providing programs for the gifted handicapped. Council for Exceptional Children.
ManzellaT. R. (2018). Parental guidance of GLBTQ gifted students. In FriedrichsT. P.ManzellaT. R.SeneyR. W. (Eds.), Needs and approaches for educators and parents of gifted gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender students (pp. 31–39). National Association for Gifted Children.
McLarenP. (1995). Moral panic, schooling, and gay identity: Critical pedagogy and the politics of resistance. In UnksG. (Ed.), The gay teen: Educational practice and theory for lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents (pp. 105–123). Routledge.
59.
McRuerJ. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York University Press.
Murphy-BermanV.WittersL.HardingR. (1985). Effect of giftedness, sex, and bottle shape on hearing impaired adolescents’ performance on the water line task. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 8(4), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235328500800404
63.
NeihartM. (2015). What we have learned and what we should do next? In NeihartM.PfiefferS. I.CrossT. L. (Eds.), Social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (2nd ed., pp. 283–298). Prufrock Press.
64.
NeihartM.PoonK. K. (2009). Gifted children with autism spectrum disorders. Prufrock Press.
65.
NielsenM. E.HigginsL. D.HammondA. E.WilliamsR. A. (1993). Gifted children with disabilities. Gifted Child Today, 16(5), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621759301600503
66.
OakesJ.RogersJ.LiptonM. (2006). Learning power: Educating for education and justice. Teachers College Press.
67.
OlkinR. (1999). What psychotherapists should know about disabilities. Guilford Press.
PerelesD.ColemanM. R.BaldwinL.OmdalS. (2022). Meeting the needs of students who are twice-exceptional. In RobertsJ. L.InmanT.RobinsJ. H. (Eds.), Introduction to gifted and talented (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003235866
70.
PetersS. J.GentryM.WhitingG. W.McBeeM. T. (2019). Who gets served in gifted education? Demographic representation and a call for action. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219833.
71.
PetersS. J.PluckerJ. A. (2016). Excellence gaps in education. Harvard University Press.
72.
ReisS. M.NeuT. W.McGuireJ. M. (1997). Case studies of high ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved. Exceptional Children, 63(4), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299706300403
73.
RenzulliJ. S. (2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive traits and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208400109
RiderG. N.VencillJ. A.BergD. R.Becker-WarnerR.Candelario-PérezL.SpencerK. G. (2019). The gender affirmative lifespan approach (GALA): A framework for competent clinical care with nonbinary clients. International Journal of Transgenderism, 20(2–3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2018.1485069
SeneyR. W. (2018). Curricular opportunities for gifted GLBTQ students. In FriedrichsT. P.ManzellaT. R.SeneyR. W. (Eds.), Needs and approaches for educators and parents of gifted gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender students (pp. 17–25). National Association for Gifted Children.
83.
SewellC. J. P.GoingsR. B. (2020). “I struggled but I made it”: Black gifted underachievers on transitioning to college. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X20901506
84.
StephensonD. D.LerouxJ. A. (1994). Portrait of a creatively gifted child facing cancer. Creativity Research Journal, 7(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419409534510
85.
TyjewskiC. (2006). Ghosts in the machine: Civil rights laws and the hybrid “invisible other.” In PothierD.DevlineR. (Eds.), Law and society series: Critical disability theory: Essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law (pp. 106–127). University of British Columbia Press.
