Gifted education coordinators play critical roles in administration and supervision of gifted education and accelerated learning programs in their districts. However, these roles are ill-defined in the literature. During the COVID-19 pandemic, leaders have been called upon to support educators and administrators in a variety of ways. This exploratory study sought to investigate the experiences of district gifted education coordinators during the first year of the pandemic. Qualitative data were collected from a national sample of 11 district gifted education coordinators through semi-structured interviews. An inductive thematic analysis revealed four categories that addressed their roles during this period: (a) professional responsibilities, (b) instructional leadership, (c) program management, and (d) communication and collaboration. The overarching theme across all interviews was the rapid need to pivot and adapt to constant change to ensure equitable access to advanced instruction. Implications for administrators of gifted education programs and areas for future study are addressed.
AboudY. (2021). Challenges to gifted education in the Covid-19 pandemic about online learning in Saudi Arabia from the perspective of gifted students and parents. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 8(1), 11–21. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jgedc/issue/58718/845995
CardulloV. M.WangC.BurtonM.DongJ. (2021). K–12 teachers’ remote teaching self-efficacy during the pandemic. Journal of Research and Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v28i1.566/
4.
ColemanL. J.GuoA.DabbsC. S. (2007). The state of qualitative research in gifted education as published in American journals. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986206296656
5.
DawsonN. E. (1972). Roles of music supervisors in selected school districts. Journal of Research in Music Education, 20(3), 397–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/3343894
6.
DiScalaJ.WeeksA. C.KodamaC. (2019). The school district library supervisor and the National School Library Standards. Knowledge Quest, 47(5), 64–71.
7.
DurakuZ. H.HoxhaN. (2020). The impact of COVID-19, school closure, and social isolation on gifted students’ wellbeing and attitudes toward remote (online) learning. In MeinckS.FraillonJ.StrietholtR. (Eds), Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education and wellbeing (pp. 130–169). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
8.
EzzaniM.MunR. U.LeeL. E. (2021). District leaders focused on systematic equity in identification and services for gifted education: From policy to practice. Roeper Review, 43(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2021.1881853
9.
GroomsA. A.ChildsJ. (2021). We need to do better by kids": Changing routines in U.S. schools in response to COVID-19 school closures. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 26(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2021.1906251
GuilbaultK. M.KirschL. B. (2020). Administrative leadership in gifted education. In PluckerJ. A.CallahanC. A. (Eds), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 23–35). Prufrock Press.
12.
GuilbaultK. M.McCormickK. M. (2022). Supporting elementary gifted learners during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of teaching practices. Gifted Education International, 38(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211070075
13.
HidayatiD.SukirmanS. (2021). Leadership of women school principals to improve school quality in the Covid-19 pandemic. Educational Administration Research and Review, 5(1), 38–46.
14.
HonigM. I. (2008). District central offices as learning organizations: How sociocultural and organizational learning theories elaborate district central office administrators' participation in teaching and learning improvement efforts. American Journal of Education, 114(4), 627–664. https://doi.org/10.1086/589317
15.
HuckC.ZhangJ. (2021). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on K-12 education: A systematic literature review. Educational Research and Development Journal, 24(1), 53–84.
16.
HycnerR. H. (1999). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. In BrymanA.BurgessR. G. (Eds), Qualitative Research. 3, 143–164.
17.
KennedyD. M. (1997). FYI: Secondary program coordinators: A job description. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X9700900105
18.
KongQ. (2020). Practical exploration of home study guidance for students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of hangzhou liuxia elementary school in zhejiang province, China. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 5(2), 557–561. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.20.rp026
19.
KreftingL. (1991). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.3.214
20.
LandisR. N.ReschlyA. L. (2013). Reexamining gifted underachievement and dropout through the lens of student engagement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(2), 220–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213480864
21.
MakelM. C.RinnA. N.PluckerJ. A. (2017). From giftedness to gifted education: Reflecting theory and practice. Routledge.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
24.
PatrickS. K.GrissomJ. A.WoodsS. C.NewsomeU. W. (2021). Broadband access, district policy, and student opportunities for remote learning during COVID-19 school closures. AERA Open, 7, 233285842110642. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211064298
25.
PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
26.
PetersS. J.BrullesD. (2018). Designing gifted education programs and services: From purpose to implementation. Prufrock Press
27.
PetersS. J.MatthewsM.McBeeM. T.McCoachD. B. (2014). Beyond gifted education: Designing and implementing advanced academic programs. Prufrock Press.
28.
ReichJ.ButtimerC. J.ColemanD.ColwellR.FaruqiF.LarkeL. R. (2020). What’s lost, what’s left, what’s next: Lessons learned from the lived experiences of teachers during the pandemic. MIT Teaching Systems Lab. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/8exp9
29.
RinnA.MunR. U.HodgesJ. (2020). 2018–2019 State of the states in gifted education. National Association for Gifted Children and the Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. https://www.nacg.org/2018-2019-state-states-gifted-education
30.
RossmanG. B.RallisS. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage.
31.
StosichE. L. (2020). Central office leadership for instructional improvement: Developing collaborative leadership among principals and instructional leadership team members. Teachers College Record, 122(9), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200908
32.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
WeinerJ.FrancoisC.Stone-JohnsonC.ChildsJ. (2021). Keep safe, keep learning: Principals' role in creating psychological safety and organizational learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 5, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.618483
35.
WolfgangC.SnydermanD. (2022). An analysis of the impact of school closings on gifted services: Recommendations for meeting gifted students’ needs in a post-COVID-19 world. Gifted Education International, 38(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211054262
36.
WoodS. (2010). Nurturing a garden: A qualitative investigation into school counselors’ experiences with gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(2), 261–302.
37.
YoungE. L.ButlerR.SmithT. B.HiltonS. C.SmithA. (2021). Recruiting and retaining school psychologists: The experiences of district level administrative supervisors. Psychology in the Schools, 58(8), 1501–1517. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22506
