This study explored the role that select components of executive functioning play in predicting reading outcomes in gifted students both directly and indirectly through a broader set of preliteracy skills. A comparison of mediation models indicated the relationships between working memory and inhibition to reading outcomes were fully, rather than partially, mediated by the preliteracy skills. The relationship between inhibition and reading outcomes was mediated through symbol imagery. Symbol imagery served as a mediator to all reading outcomes in this study (Letter Word, Oral Reading Fluency [ORF], and Northwest Evaluation Association Reading Fluency). A measurement of Working Memory in kindergarten was related to ORF in the second grade through speeded naming as a mediator. Neither early phonological processing nor early processing speed were related to the reading outcomes. Implications regarding the use of screening measures for identifying reading difficulties in primary age gifted students are discussed.
Al-HroubA. (2011). Developing assessment profiles for mathematically gifted children with learning difficulties at three schools in cambridgeshire, England. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(1), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003400102
2.
AssoulineS.NicponM.HuberD. (2006). The impact of vulnerabilities and strengths on the academic experiences of twice-exceptional students: A message to school counselors. Professional School Counseling, 10(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.011
3.
BajreP.KhanA. (2019). Developmental dyslexia in Hindi readers: Is consistent sound symbol mapping an asset in reading? Evidence from phonological and visuospatial working memory. Dyslexia, 25(7), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1632
BellN. (2010). Symbol imagery test. Gander Publishing.
6.
BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D.ThomsonJ.WagnerR.SwansonH. L.WijsmanE. M.RaskindW. (2006). Modeling phonological core deficits within a working memory architecture in children and adults with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(2), 165–198. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1002_3
7.
BerningerV. W.RaskindW.RichardsT.AbbottR.StockP. (2008). A multidisciplinary approach to understanding developmental dyslexia within working-memory architecture: Genotypes, phenotypes, brain, and instruction. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33(6), 707–744. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/87565640802418662
8.
BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D. (2013). Differences between children with dyslexia who are and are not gifted in verbal reasoning. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213500342
9.
BosseM.-l.ChavesN.LargyP.ValdoisS. (2015). Orthographic learning during reading: The role of whole-word visual processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01551.x
10.
ChristodoulouJ. A.CyrA.MurtaghJ.ChangP.LinJ.GuarinoA. J.HookP.GabrieliJ. D. E. (2017). Impact of intensive summer reading intervention for children with reading disabilities and difficulties in early elementary school. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415617163
11.
DeaconS. H.PasquarellaA.MarinusE.TimsT.CastlesA. (2019). Orthographic processing and children’s word reading. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(2), 509–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000681
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.PaganiL. S.FeinsteinL.EngelM.Brooks-GunnJ.SextonH.DuckworthK.JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
14.
EhriL. (2020). The science of learning to read words: A case for systematic phonics instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(3), 45–60. https://doi:10.1002/rrq.334
15.
Foley NicponM.AllmonA.SieckB.StinsonR. D. (2011). Empirical investigation of twice-exceptionality: Where have we been and where are we going?Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 3–17.https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210382575
16.
FoormanB. R.PetscherY.HerreraS. (2018). Unique and common effects of decoding and language factors in predicting reading comprehension in grades 1–10. Learning and Individual Differences, 63, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.011
GerstE. H.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.YoshidaH. (2017). Cognitive and behavioral rating measures of executive function as predictors of academic outcomes in children. Child Neuropsychology, 23(4), 381–407. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/09297049.2015.1120860
19.
GioiaG. A.IsquithP. K.GuyS. S.KenworthyL. (2013). Behavior rating inventory of executive function professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
20.
GoodR. H.KaminskiR. A. (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills administration & scoring guide (6th ed.). Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
21.
Hernández FinchM. E.Speirs NeumeisterK. L.BurneyV. H.CookA. L. (2014). The relationship of cognitive and executive functioning with achievement in gifted kindergarten children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534889
22.
HjetlandH. N.LervågA.LysterS.-A. H.HagtvetB. E.HulmeC.Melby-LervågM. (2019). Pathways to reading comprehension: A longitudinal study from 4 to 9 years of age. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 751–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000321
23.
HollandJ.McIntoshD.HuffmanL. (2004). The role of phonological awareness, rapid automatized naming, and orthographic processing in word reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 22(3), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428290402200304
24.
KaplanD. (2014). Methodology in the social sciences. Bayesian statistics for the social sciences. Guilford Press
25.
KilpatrickD. (2015). Essentials of assessing, preventing, and overcoming reading difficulties. John Wiley and Sons.
26.
KirbyJ. R.DesrochersA.RothL.LaiS. S. V. (2008). Longitudinal predictors of word reading development. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.103
27.
KorkmanM.KirkU.KempS. (2007). NEPSY-II: A developmental neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). The Psychological Corporation.
28.
MaddocksD. L. S. (2018). The identification of students who are gifted and have a learning disability: A comparison of different diagnostic criteria. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0016986217752096
29.
MaddocksD. L. S. (2020). Cognitive and achievement characteristics of students from a national sample identified as potentially twice exceptional (gifted with a learning disability). Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219886668
30.
MartinussenR.GrimbosT.FerrariJ. L. S. (2014). Word-level reading achievement and behavioral inattention: Exploring their overlap and relations with naming speed and phonemic awareness in a community sample of children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29(7), 680–690. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acu040
31.
McCallumR. S.BellS. M.ColesJ. T.MillerK. C.HopkinsM. B.Hilton-PrillhartA. (2013). A model for screening twice-exceptional students (gifted with learning disabilities) within a response to intervention paradigm. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(4), 209–222. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0016986213500070
32.
McGrathL. M.PenningtonB. F.ShanahanM. A.Santerre-LemmonL. E.BarnardH. D.WillcuttE. G.DefriesJ. C.OlsonR. K. (2011). A multiple deficit model of reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Searching for shared cognitive deficits. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(5), 547–557. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02346
33.
McGrathL. M.PetersonR. L.PenningtonB. F. (2020). The multiple deficit model: Progress, problems, and prospects. Scientific Studies of reading, 24(1), 7–13. http://doi.10.1080/10888438.2019.1706180
34.
McGrewK. S.SchrankF. A.WoodcockR. W. (2007). Technical manual: Woodcock Johnson III normative update. Riverside.
35.
NationK. (2019). Children’s reading difficulties, language, and reflections on the simple view of reading. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 24(9), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2019.1609272
36.
RabinerD. L.MaloneP. S.Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2004). The impact of tutoring on early reading achievement for children with and without attention problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jacp.0000026141.20174.17
37.
ReisS. M.BaumS. M.BurkeE. (2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534976
38.
RichardsT. L.AylwardE. H.FieldK. M.GrimmeA. C.RaskindW.RichardsA. L.NagyW.EckertM.LeonardC.AbbottR. D.BerningerV. W. (2006). Converging evidence for triple word form theory in children with dyslexia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 30(1), 547–589. https://doi.org/doi:10.1207/s15326942dn3001_3
39.
RiccioC. A.ReynoldsC. R.LoweP.MooreJ. J. (2002). The continuous performance test: A window on the neural substrates for attention?Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17(3), 235–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0887-6177(01)00111-1
40.
RoebuckH.FreigangC.BarryJ. G. (2016). Continuous performance tasks: Not just about sustaining attention. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(3), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-15-0068
41.
SavageR. (2001). The ‘simple view’ of reading: Some evidence and possible implications. Educational Psychology in Practice, 17(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360120039951
42.
ShareD. L. (2011). On the role of phonology in reading acquisition: The self-teaching hypothesis. In BradyS. A.BrazeD.FowlerC. A.BradyS. A.BrazeD.FowlerC. A. (Eds.), Explaining individual differences in reading: Theory and evidence (pp. 45–68). Psychology Press.
43.
SimsD. M.LoniganC. J. (2013). Inattention, hyperactivity, and emergent literacy: Different facets of inattention relate uniquely to preschoolers’ reading-related skills. Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology, 42(2), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2012.738453
44.
Sonuga-BarkeE. J.DalenL.DaleyD.RemingtonB. (2010). Are planning, working memory, and inhibition associated with individual differences in preschool ADHD symptoms?Developmental Neuropsychology, 21(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326942DN2103_3
StanovichK. E.CunninghamA. E.CramerB. B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(84)90120-6
47.
StanovichK. E.SiegelL. S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 24–53. https://doi.org/doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.24
48.
TorppaM.GeorgiouG.LerkkanenM.NiemiP.PoikkeusA.NurmiJ. (2016). Examining the simple view of reading in a transparent orthography: A longitudinal study from kindergarten to grade 3. Merrill-Palmer Q, 62(2), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.62.2.0179
49.
van ViersenS.KroesbergenE. H.SlotE. M.de BreeE. H. (2014). High reading skills mask dyslexia in gifted children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414538517
50.
van ViersenS.de BreeE. H.SlotE. M.de JongP. F. (2015). Risk and protective factors in gifted children with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 65(3), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-015-0106-y
51.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.73
52.
WalcottC. M.ScheemakerA.BielskiK. (2010). A longitudinal investigation of inattention and preliteracy development. Journal of Attention Disorders, 14(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054709333330
53.
WechslerD. (2002). WPPSI-III technical and interpretative manual. The Psychological Corporation.
54.
WechslerD. (2003). WISC-IV technical and interpretative manual. The Psychological Corporation.
55.
WillcuttE. G.BetjemannR. S.McGrathL. M.ChhabildasN. A.OlsonR. K.DeFriesJ. C.PenningtonB. F. (2010). Etiology and neuropsychology of comorbidity between RD and ADHD: The case for multiple-deficit models. Cortex, 46(10), 1345–1361. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.009
56.
WodkaE. L.MahoneE. M.BlanknerJ. G.LarsonJ. C. G.FotedarS.DencklaM. B.MostofskyS. H. (2007). Evidence that response inhibition is a primary deficit in ADHD. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29(4), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390600678046
57.
ZarićJ.HasselhornM.NaglerT. (2021). Orthographic knowledge predicts reading and spelling skills over and above general intelligence and phonological awareness. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(3), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00464-7
