Learning About the Lives and Early Experiences of Notable Asian American Women: Productive Giftedness,Childhood Traits,and Supportive Conditions

Abstract

Despite one-dimensional stereotypes and barriers experienced by Asian American women, many have achieved prominence. We know very little about these stories, their lives, or what helped them to achieve beyond expectations. Based on the Productive Giftedness Model, the article identifies the common traits and supportive conditions that influence their success. To help illustrate these experiences, the article highlights the lives of 10 notable Asian American women across diverse professions. These women displayed “productive giftedness” as girls; they were accomplished, determined, and skillful early on, which led to excellence, awards, and leadership opportunities. Many also had supportive conditions including the investment of one or more adults. Parents, teachers, and mentors can further enhance these opportunities for Asian American girls. These general principles can be learned and applied to other groups as well. Supporting individual, instructional, and environmental factors can influence learning and achievement for girls in the early and school years.

Keywords

talent development productive giftedness underrepresentation girls gifted eminence Asian American

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albert

R. S.

(1994). The achievement of eminence: A longitudinal study of exceptionally gifted boys and their families. In Subotnik

R. F.

Arnold

K. D.

(Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 282–315). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Amabile

T. M.

(1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer.

Arnold

K. D.

Subotnik

R. F.

(1995). Mentoring the gifted: A differentiated model. Educational Horizons, 73, 118–123.

Asian American Biographies. (1994). Paramus, NJ: Globe Fearon.

Associated Press. (2011, April 26). In a first, women surpass men in college degrees. CBS News. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/in-a-first-women-surpass-men-in-college-degrees/

Basu

(1996). Pioneering Hindu women in India: Overcoming barriers and claiming their places in today’s society. In Arnold

K. D.

Subotnik

R. F.

(Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development (pp. 209–224). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Bloom

B. S.

(1985). Generalizations about talent development. In Bloom

B. S.

(Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 507–549). New York, NY: Ballantine Books.

Chu

(1980). Asian American women in educational research. Integrated Education, 18, 55–60.

Clasen

D. R.

Clasen

R. E.

(2003). Mentoring the gifted and talented. In Colangelo

Davis

G. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 254–267). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

10.

Coleman

J. S.

(1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 94–120.

11.

Cox

C. M.

(1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

12.

Creswell

J. W.

(2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluation quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

13.

Cridel

(2016). An introduction to biographical research. Retrieved from http://www.aera.net/SIG013/Research-Connections/Introduction-to-Biographical-Research

14.

Csikszentmihalyi

(1992). Motivation and creativity. In Albert

R. S.

(Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 19–33). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.

15.

Csikszentmihalyi

Rathunde

Whalen

(1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Dweck

(2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.

17.

Ericsson

K. A.

Prietula

M. J.

Cokely

E. T.

(2007). The making of an expert. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/2007/07/the-making-of-an-expert/ar/1

18.

Filippelli

L. A.

Walberg

H. J.

(1997). Childhood traits and conditions of eminent women scientists. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 95–104.

19.

Freeman

K. A.

Walberg

H. J.

(1999). Childhood traits and conditions of eminent African American women. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 402–419.

20.

Gardner

(1994). The fruits of asynchrony: A psychological examination of creativity. In Feldman

D. H.

Csikszentmihalyi

Gardner

(Eds.), Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity (pp. 47–68). Westport, CT: Praeger.

21.

Heckman

J. J.

Masterov

D. V.

(2007). The productivity argument for investing in young children. Review of Agricultural Economics, 29, 446–493.

22.

Hickey

M. G.

(2006). Asian Indian family socialization patterns and implications for American schooling. In Park

C. C.

Endo

Goodwin

A. L.

(Eds.), Asian and Pacific American education: Learning, socialization, and identity (pp. 193–218). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

23.

Hune

(2006). Asian Pacific American women and men in higher education: The contested spaces of their participation, persistence, and challenges as students, faculty, and administrators. In Li

Becket

G. H.

(Eds.), “Strangers” of the academy: Asian women scholars in higher education (pp. 15–36). Sterling, VA: Stylus.

24.

Hune

Nonomura

G. M.

(2003). Asian/Pacific Islander American Women: A historical anthology. New York: New York University Press.

25.

Hyun

(2005). Breaking the bamboo ceiling: Career strategies for Asians. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

26.

International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) (No. 96-71251). Chesthill, MA: Boston College, Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy.

27.

Kaufman

S. B.

Kaufman

J. C.

(2007). Ten years to expertise, many more to greatness: An investigation to writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 114–124.

28.

Kim

H.-C.

(1999). Distinguished Asian Americans: A biographical dictionary. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

29.

Kitano

(1993). Generations and identity: The Japanese American. Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.

30.

Kitano

M. K.

(1997). Gifted Asian American women. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 3–37. doi:10.1177/016235329702100102

31.

Kitano

M. K.

(1999). Bringing clarity to “This thing called giftedness”: A response to Dr. Renzulli. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 87–101.

32.

Kula

S. M.

Paik

S. J.

(2016). A historical analysis of Southeast Asian refugee communities: Post-war acculturation and education. Journal of Southeast Asian American Education and Advancement, 11, 1–23.

33.

Becket

G. H.

(Eds.). (2006). “ Strangers” of the academy: Asian women scholars in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

34.

Locke

E. A.

Latham

G. P.

(2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.

35.

Mathews

(2000). Cultural patterns of South Asian and Southeast Asian Americans. Intervention in School and Clinic, 36, 101–104. doi:10.1177/105345120003600205

36.

Matthews

D. J.

(2009). Developmental transitions in giftedness and talent: Childhood into adolescence. In Horowitz

F. D.

Subotnik

R. F.

Matthews

D. J.

(Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the life span (pp. 89–107). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

37.

Merton

R. K.

(1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56–63.

38.

Montez

J. M.

(1998). Asian/Pacific American women in higher education administration: Doubly bound, doubly scarce (No. 9). Pullman, WA: Washington State University.

39.

Museus

S. D.

Chang

M. J.

(2009). Rising to the challenge of conducting research on Asian Americans in higher education. New Directions in Educational Research, 142, 95–105.

40.

Museus

S. D.

Kiang

P. N.

(2009). Deconstructing the model minority myth and how it contributes to the invisible minority reality in higher education research. Conducting Research on Asian Americans in Higher Education: New Directions in Educational Research, 142, 5–15.

41.

Olszewski-Kublius

(2010). Psychological factors in the development of adulthood giftedness from childhood talent. Retrieved from http://www.ctd.northwestern.edu/resources/displayArticle/?id=125

42.

Ono

K. A.

Pham

(2009). Asian Americans and the media. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

43.

Paik

S. J.

(2001). Educational productivity in South Korea and the U.S. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 535–607.

44.

Paik

S. J.

(2008). Altering the curriculum of the home: Learning environments for Korean and U.S. students. Marriage & Family Review, 43, 289–307.

45.

Paik

S. J.

(2012). From dogmatic mastery to creative productivity. In Ambrose

Sternberg

(Eds.), How dogmatic beliefs harm creativity and higher-level thinking (pp. 185–191). New York, NY: Routledge.

46.

Paik

S. J.

(2013). Nurturing talent, creativity, and productive giftedness: A new mastery model. In Kim

K. H.

Kaufman

J. C.

Baer

Sriraman

(Eds.), Creatively gifted students are not like other gifted students: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 101–119). Boston, MA: Sense.

47.

Paik

S. J.

(2015). Educational productivity: Achieving excellence. In Wright

J. D.

(Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 1–23). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.

48.

Paik

S. J.

Choe

S. M. M.

Witenstein

M. A.

(2016). Filipinos in the U.S.: Historical, social, and educational experiences. Social and Education History, 5, 134–160.

49.

Paik

S. J.

Kula

S. M.

Saito

L. E.

Rahman

Witenstein

M. A.

(2014). Historical perspectives on diverse Asian American communities: Immigration, incorporation, and education. Teachers College Record, 116(8), 1–45.

50.

Paik

S. J.

Rahman

Kula

S. M.

Saito

L. E.

Witenstein

M. A.

(2017a). Diverse Asian American families and communities: Culture, structure, and education (Part 1: Why they differ). School Community Journal, 27, 35–66.

51.

Paik

S. J.

Rahman

Kula

S. M.

Saito

L. E.

Witenstein

M. A.

(2017b). Ethnic afterschool programs and language schools in diverse Asian American communities: Varying resources, opportunities, and educational experiences (Part 2: How they differ). School Community Journal, 27, 67–96.

52.

Patrikakou

E. N.

Weissberg

R. P.

Redding

Walberg

H. J.

(Eds.). (2005). School-family partnerships for children’s success. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

53.

Pew Research Center. (2012). The rise of Asian Americans. Washington, DC: Pew Social & Demographics Trends. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2012/06/SDT-The-Rise-of-Asian-Americans-Full-Report.pdf

54.

Rahman

Paik

S. J.

(2017). South Asian immigration and education in the U.S.: Historical and social contexts. Social and Education History, 6, 26–52.

55.

Redding

(2003). Parents and learning. Geneva, Switzerland: International Academy of Education. Retrieved from http://www.orientation94.org/uploaded/MakalatPdf/Manchurat/prac02e.pdf

56.

Renzulli

J. S.

Reis

S. M.

(2000). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model. In Heller

K. A.

Mönks

F. J.

Sternberg

R. J.

Subotnik

R. F.

(Eds.), International handbook of gifted education (pp. 184–203). Danvers, MA: Elsevier Science.

57.

Roberts

(2002). Biographical research. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.

58.

Seo

B.-I.

Hinton

(2009). How they see us, how we see them: Two women of color in higher education. Race, Gender & Class, 16, 203–217.

59.

Sicherman

Green

C. H.

Kantrov

Walker

(Eds.). (1980). Notable American women: The modern period. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

60.

Simonton

D. K.

(1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

61.

Sinnott

(1993). Extraordinary Asian Pacific Americans. Chicago, IL: Children’s Press.

62.

Sosniak

(2003). Developing talent: Time, task, and context. In Colangelo

Davis

G. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 254–267). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

63.

Sternberg

R. J.

(1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292–316.

64.

Sternberg

R. J.

Jarvin

Grigorenko

E. L.

(2011). Explorations in giftedness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

65.

Sternberg

R. J.

Williams

W. M.

(n.d.). Teaching for creativity: Two dozen tips. Retrieved from http://www.cdl.org/articles/teaching-for-creativity-two-dozen-tips/

66.

Subotnik

R. F.

(2009). Developmental transitions in giftedness and talent: Adolescence into adulthood. In Horowitz

F. D.

Subotnik

R. F.

Matthews

D. J.

(Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the life span (pp. 155-170). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

67.

Sun

(1998). The academic success of East Asian-American Students: An investment model. Social Science Research, 27, 432–456.

68.

Suyemoto

K. L.

Kim

G. S.

Tanabe

Tawa

Day

S. C.

(2009). Challenging the model minority myth: Engaging Asian American students in research on Asian American college student experiences. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(142), 41–55. doi:10.1002/ir.295

69.

Takaki

(1998). Strangers from a different shore: A history of Asian Americans. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

70.

Tantengco

M. T. T.

(2011). Family and home factors that facilitate talent development and achievement among distinguished Filipino women. Alipato: A Journal of Basic Education, 5, 73–88.

71.

Teranishi

R. T.

Ceja

Antonio

A. L.

Allen

W. R.

McDonough

P. M.

(2004). The college-choice process for Asian Pacific Americans: Ethnicity and socioeconomic. Review of Higher Education, 27, 527–551.

72.

Terman

L. M.

(1925). Genetic studies of genius: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

73.

Walberg

H. J.

(1969). A portrait of the artist and scientist as young men. Exceptional Children, 36, 5–11.

74.

Walberg

H. J.

(1971). Varieties of creativity and the high school environment. Exceptional Children, 38, 111–116.

75.

Walberg

H. J.

(1982). Childhood traits and environmental conditions of highly eminent adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 103–107.

76.

Walberg

H. J.

(1984). Improving the productivity of America’s schools. Educational Leadership, 41, 19–27.

77.

Walberg

H. J.

Paik

S. J.

(1997). Home environments for learning. In Walberg

H. J.

Haertel

G. D.

(Eds.), Psychology and educational practice (pp. 356–368). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

78.

Walberg

H. J.

Paik

S. J.

(2005). Making giftedness productive. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 395–410). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

79.

Walberg

H. J.

Stariha

W. E.

(1992). Productive human capital: Learning, creativity, and eminence. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 323–340.

80.

Walberg

H. J.

Tsai

S.-L.

(1984). Matthew effects in education. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 359–374.

81.

Walberg

H. J.

Tsai

S.-L.

Weinstein

Gabriel

C. L.

Rasher

S. P.

Rosecrans

. . . Vukosavich

(1981). Childhood traits and environmental conditions of highly eminent adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 103–107.

82.

Wallace

Walberg

H. J.

(1987). Personality traits and childhood environments of eminent essayists. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 65–69.

83.

Woo

(1994). The glass ceiling and Asian Americans. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor Glass Ceiling Commission.

84.

Zhou

Kim

S. S.

(2006). Community forces, social capital, and educational achievement: The case of supplementary education in the Chinese and Korean immigrant communities. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 1–29.

85.

Zia

Gall

S. B.

(Eds.). (1995). Notable Asian Americans. Detroit, MI: Gale Research.