Honors programs represent one way that secondary schools and undergraduate programs address the needs of academically talented students. Evidence suggests that these programs contribute to positive student outcomes in terms of achievement, social development, and career preparation. Because colleges of education produce graduates who typically confront the prospect of low salaries, attracting high-ability applicants is important. Despite the benefits of encouraging talented individuals to become teachers, few traditional teacher education programs use honors programs. This study reports on an honors program in a college of education that incorporates distinct course work and field experiences, focused especially on inquiry and research. Qualitative interviewing revealed three themes: How the program’s focus on inquiry and research fits with participants’ expectations and interests, complex and conflicting responses to the program’s focus on leadership development, and significant logistical challenges. These themes corroborated findings from related literature on honors programs in secondary schools and undergraduate programs.
BergerJ. (2007). Honors as a transformative experience: The role of liberal arts honors programs in community colleges. Journal of College Admissions, 194, 28-32.
2.
BishopD. M.SittasonK. (2007). Integrating an honors minor, education major and global teacher preparation. Honors in Practice, 3, 87-98.
3.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
4.
BoserJ.WileyP. (1988). An alternative teacher preparation program: Is the promise fulfilled?Peabody Journal of Education, 65, 130-142.
5.
BoserJ.WileyP.PettiboneT. (1986, November). A comparison of participants in traditional and alternative teacher education programs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Memphis, TN.
6.
CampbellK. C.FuquaD. R. (2008). factors predictive of student completion in a collegiate honors program. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 10, 129-153.
7.
Cohen-VogelL.SmithT. M. (2007). Qualifications and assignments of alternatively certified teachers: Testing core assumptions. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 732-753.
8.
Darling-HammondL.HoltzmanD. J.GatlinS. J.HeiligJ. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/147
9.
EvansH. C. (1983). Course extension in the B.Ed. degree: A case study. Journal of Education for Teaching, 9, 184-194.
10.
EvansS.KingR.LandersM. (1986, February). A comprehensive plan for attaching able students to teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Atlanta, GA.
11.
FelderB. D. (1986). Reflective Inquiry Teacher Education [RITE]. University of Houston College of Education Teacher Education Program. Washington, DC: Office of Education Research and Improvement.
12.
GlazermanS.MayerD.DeckerP. (2006). Alternative routes to teaching: The impacts of Teach for America on student achievement and other outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 75-96.
13.
GlennenR. E.MartinD. J. (1999). Kansas Regents Honors Academy: A follow-up study. Emporia, KS: Emporia State University, Jones Institute for Educational Excellence. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 434 571)
14.
HébertT. P.McBeeM. T. (2007). The impact of an undergraduate honors program on gifted university students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 136-151.
15.
HeideT.KozickiK.PedrasM. J. (1999, April). Mapping education for the new millennium: A UI perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northwest Association of Teacher Educators, Coeur d’Alene, ID.
16.
HowleyA.HenningJ.SafranJ.HelfrichS.HarrisonL.HowleyM. (2011, November3). The Patton College of Education and Human Services Connavino Honors Program: Internal evaluation report (Unpublished internal document). Patton College of Education, Ohio University, Athens.
17.
HowleyA.HowleyC. B.PendarvisE. D. (1986). Teaching gifted children: Principles and strategies. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
18.
HowleyC. B.HowleyA.PendarvisE. D. (1995). Out of our minds: Anti-intellectualism and talent development in American schooling. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
19.
HughesS. (1987, February). Learning to be a leader. Paper presented at the mid-winter institute of the National Association of Gifted Children, Charlotte, NC. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 303 937)
20.
Kent State University. (1989a). Preparing academically talented students for teaching (Final Report, Part A: Project Portrayal). Washington, DC: Office of Education Research and Improvement.
21.
Kent State University. (1989b). Preparing academically talented students for teaching (Final Report, Part B: Program Assessment). Washington, DC: Office of Education Research and Improvement.
22.
Kent State University. (1989c). Preparing academically talented students for teaching (Final Report, Part C: Practice Profile). Washington, DC: Office of Education Research and Improvement.
23.
LongB. T. (2002). Attracting the best: The use of honors programs to compete for students. Chicago, IL: Spencer Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 465 355)
24.
MargolinL. (1996). A pedagogy of privilege. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 164-180.
25.
MatthewsM. S. (2004). Leadership education for gifted and talented youth: A review of the literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 77-113.
26.
McDonaldC. (2010). Community: The heart of honors study. Journal of Education and Christian Belief, 14, 83-95.
27.
McGregorG. (2001). Gifted and talented youth as philosophers of the new millennium. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 157-159.
28.
McKeagueP. M. (1984, June). The role of the honors program in the community college curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual National Conference on Teaching Excellence, Austin, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 252 260)
29.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
NobleK. D.ChildersS. A.VaughanR. C. (2008). A place to be celebrated and understood: The impact of early university entrance from parents’ points of view. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 256-268.
32.
NobleL. S.DowlingJ. E. (2007). Where are the education majors and faculty?Honors in Practice, 3, 82-86.
33.
Norlander-CaseK.CampbellB.ReaganT. G.CaseC. W. (1998). The role of collaborative inquiry and reflective practice in teacher education. Professional Educator, 21, 1-16.
34.
OryJ.BraskampL. (1988). Involvement and growth of students in three academic programs. Research in Higher Education, 28, 116-129.
35.
ReedD. (1988). Honors programs in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 10, 35-39.
36.
RinnA. N. (2006). Effects of a summer program on the social self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 65-75.
37.
RinnA. N. (2007). Effects of programmatic selectivity on the academic achievement, academic self-concepts, and aspirations of gifted college students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 232-245.
38.
SeifertT. A.PascarellaE. T.ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G. (2007). The effects of honors program participation on experiences of good practices and learning outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 57-74.
39.
SubotnikR. F.ColemanL. J. (1996). Establishing the foundations for a talent development school: Applying principles to creating an ideal. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 175-189.
40.
TaylorC. W. (1986). The growing importance of creativity and leadership in spreading gifted and talented programs world-wide. Roeper Review, 8, 256-263.
41.
TaylorK.HaynesC. (2008). A framework for intentionally fostering student learning. About Campus, 13, 2-11.
42.
TestaS. (2010). Perceptions of teachers and students regarding the middle school honors program. Current Issues in Education, 13. Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu
43.
TournakiN.LyublinskayaI.CarolanB. V. (2009). Pathways to teacher certification: Does it really matter when it comes to efficacy and effectiveness?Action in Teacher Education, 30, 96-109.
44.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (1986). Effective curriculum and instructional models for talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 164-169.
45.
VarsG. F.RakowS. R. (1993). Making connections: Integrative curriculum and the gifted student. Roeper Review, 16, 48-53.
46.
WebsterH. (1978). A new model for B.Ed. degrees: A case study. British Journal of Teacher Education, 4, 229-238.
