The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of mixed research techniques in empirical studies published in gifted education journals. During Phase 1, empirical full-text databases and relevant electronic bibliographic databases related to gifted education were searched during a time span of 10 to 18 years, resulting in the identification of 32 mixed research studies. During Phase 2, frequency data were compiled detailing the types of methods (quantitative, qualitative, mixed) implemented in empirical studies published in three leading gifted education research journals covering the time span of 5 years. A sequential mixed analysis was conducted on Phase 2 data, and results indicated that authors of empirical research articles utilized primarily quantitative methods. Among the 19 studies identified as mixed research, 5 utilized a mixed design that was categorized as a partially mixed, concurrent, dominant status design.
AliseM. A.TeddlieC. (2010). A continuation of the paradigm wars? Prevalence rates of methodological approaches across the social/behavioral sciences. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4, 103-126. doi::10.1177/155868980936080510.1177/1558689809360805
2.
BiancoM.LeechN. L. (2010). Twice exceptional learners: Effects of teacher preparation and disability labels on gifted referrals. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 319-334. doi::10.1177/088840640935639210.1177/0888406409356392
3.
BorlandJ. H.SchnurR.WrightL. (2000). Economically disadvantaged students in a school for the academically gifted: A postpositivist inquiry into individual and family adjustment. Gift Child Quarterly, 44, 13-32. doi::10.1177/00169862000440010310.1177/001698620004400103
4.
BriceA. E.ShaunessyE.HughesC.McHattonP. A.RatliffM. A. (2008). What language discourse tells us about bilingual adolescents: A study of students in gifted programs and students in general education programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32, 7-33.
5.
ColemanL. J.GuoA.DabbsC. S. (2007). The state of qualitative research in gifted education as published in American journals. Gifted Child Quarterly, 1, 51-63. doi::10.1177/001698620629665610.1177/0016986206296656
6.
CollinsK. M. T.OnwuegbuzieA. J.SuttonI. L. (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4, 67-100.
7.
CollinsK. M. T.OnwuegbuzieA. J.SuttonI. L. (2007, February). The role of mixed methods research in special education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.
8.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L.GutmannM.HansonW. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
FirestoneW. A. (1993). Alternative arguments for generalizing from data, as applied to qualitative research. Educational Researcher, 22(4), 16-23. doi::10.2307/117710010.2307/1177100
11.
GerstenR.FuchsL.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149-164.
12.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
HartL. C.SmithS. Z.SwarsS. L.SmithM. E. (2009). An examination of research methods in mathematics education. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 30, 26-41. doi::10.1177/155868980832577110.1177/1558689808325771
14.
Hurmerinta-PeltomakiL.NummelaN. (2006). Mixed methods in international business research: A value-added perspective. Management International Review, 46, 439-459. doi::10.1007/s11575-006-0100-z10.1007/s11575-006-0100-z
15.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. doi::10.1177/155868980629822410.1177/1558689806298224
16.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J.TurnerL. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112-133. doi::10.1177/155868980629822410.1177/1558689806298224
17.
KennedyM. (1979). Generalizing from single case studies. Evaluation Review, 3, 661-678. doi::10.1177/0193841X790030040910.1177/0193841X7900300409
18.
LeechN. L.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2009). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 43, 265-275. doi::10.1007/s11135-007-9105-310.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
19.
LeechN. L.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2011). Mixed research in counseling: Trends in the literature. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling Development, 44, 169-180. doi::10.1177/074817561140984810.1177/0748175611409848
20.
OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2003). Effect sizes in qualitative research: A prolegomenon. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 37, 393-409. doi::10.1023/A:102737922353710.1023/A:1027379223537
21.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.CollinsK. M. T.LeechN. L.JiaoQ. G. (2010). Mixed analysis techniques for conducting research on giftedness and beyond. In ThompsonB.SubotnikR. F. (Eds.), Research methodologies for conducting research on giftedness (pp. 113-143). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.DanielL. G. (Eds.). (2006). New directions in mixed methods research [Special issue]. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 1-98.
23.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.JiaoQ. G.CollinsK. M. T. (2007). Mixed methods research: A new direction for the study of stress and coping. In. GatesG. (Ed.), Emerging thought and research on students, teacher, and administrator stress and coping (Research on Stress and Coping in Education, Vol. 4, pp. 215-243). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
24.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatist researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8, 375-387.
25.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.SlateJ. R.LeechN. L.CollinsK. M. T. (2009). Mixed data analysis: Advanced integration techniques. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 13-33.
26.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.TeddlieC. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 351-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
PowellH.MihalasS.OnwuegbuzieA. J.SuldoS.DaleyC. E. (2008). Mixed methods research in school psychology: A mixed methods investigation of trends in the literature. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 291-309. doi::10.1002/pits.2029610.1002/pits.20296
28.
RossA.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2010). Mixed methods research design: A comparison of prevalence in JRME and AERJ. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4, 233-245.
29.
SchwandtT. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 189-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
StakeR. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.). (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
34.
ThompsonB.SubotnikR. F. (Eds.). (2010). Methodologies for conducting research on giftedness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
