General classroom teachers are being called upon to meet the needs of an increasingly diverse population of students. Although abundant research documents the specific needs of gifted students, too little is being done at the preservice teacher level to prepare our teachers to recognize and meet these needs (e.g., Feldhusen & Kolloff, 1986; VanTassel-Baska, 2003). This study examined the change in beliefs by one cohort of preservice teachers after participation in a gifted education course and practicum. Interviews with the participants following the intervention period were used to assess the participants' perceptions of the effect the course and practicum had on their understanding of gifted students' needs and their ability to meet those needs. Interview data were triangulated with classroom observations and lesson plans created by the participants for use during the practicum. Findings indicated the participants perceived an increase in their overall level of professional development, as well as an increase in their level of understanding of the characteristics and needs of gifted students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArchambaultF. X.WestbergK. L.BrownS. W.HallmarkB. W.ZhangW.EmmonsC. L. (1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 103–119.
2.
BangelN. J. (2004). Growth as a professional through teaching in Super Saturday. Unpublished master's thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
3.
CopenhaverR. W.McIntyreD. J. (1992). Teachers' perceptions of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14, 151–153.
4.
CramerR. H. (1991). The education of gifted children in the United States: A Delphi study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 84–91.
5.
CroninJ. F. (1993). Four misconceptions about authentic learning. Educational Leadership, 50, 78–80.
6.
CrossJ. A.DobbsC. (1987). Goals of a teacher training program for teachers of the gifted. Roeper Review, 9, 170–171.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1985). The teacher of gifted students. Gifted Education International, 3, 87–93.
9.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1991). Saturday and summer programs. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 197–208). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1997). Educating teachers for work with talented youth. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 547–555). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
FeldhusenJ. F.HansenJ. (1988). Teachers of the gifted: Preparation and supervision. Gifted Education International, 5, 84–89.
12.
FeldhusenJ. F.HuffmanL. (1988). Practicum experiences in an educational program for teachers of the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 34–45.
13.
FeldhusenJ. F.KolloffP. B. (1986). The Purdue three-stage enrichment model for gifted education at the elementary level. In RenzulliJ. S. (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 126–152). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
14.
FeldhusenJ. F.KolloffP. B. (1988). A three-stage model for gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 11, 14–20.
15.
FeldhusenJ. F.RuckmanD. R. (1988). A guide to the development of Saturday programs for gifted and talented youth. Gifted Child Today, 11(5), 56–61.
16.
GallagherJ. J. (2000). Unthinkable thoughts: Education of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 5–12.
17.
HanninenG. E. (1988). A study of teacher training in gifted education. Roeper Review, 10, 139–144.
18.
HansenJ. B. (1988). The relationship of skills and classroom climate of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
19.
HansenJ. B.FeldhusenJ. F. (1990). Off campus training of teachers of the gifted: A program model. Gifted International, 6, 54–62.
20.
HansenJ. B.FeldhusenJ. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 115–121.
21.
HowellH.BresslerJ. (1988). Research on teaching styles of teachers of the gifted. Roeper Review, 10, 144–146.
22.
JonesL. (1991). Training teachers for the exceptionally able child. Gifted Education International, 7, 76–79.
23.
KaganD. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129–169.
24.
MoonS. M.FeldhusenJ. F.DillonD. R. (1994). Long-term effects of an enrichment program based on the Purdue three-stage model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 38–48.
25.
MoonS. M.RosselliH. C. (2000). Developing gifted programs. In HellerK. A.MönksF. J.SternbergR. J.SubotnikR. F. (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 499–521). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
26.
NelsonK. C.PrindleN. (1992). Gifted teacher competencies: Ratings by rural principals and teachers compared. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 357–369.
27.
ParkeB. N. (1989). Educating the gifted and talented: An agenda for the future. Educational Leadership, 46, 4–5.
28.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
ReisS. M.WestbergK. L. (1994). The impact of staff development on teachers' ability to modify curriculum for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 127–135.
30.
RossP. O. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
31.
SiskD. (1975). Teaching the gifted and talented teachers: A training model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19, 81–88.
32.
StarkoA. J.SchackG. D. (1989). Perceived need, teacher efficacy, and teacher strategies for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 118–122.
33.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
TollM. F. (2000). The importance of teacher preparation programs to appropriately serve students who are gifted. Understanding Our Gifted, 12, 14–16.
35.
TomlinsonC. A.CallahanC. M.TomchinE. M.EissN.ImbeauM.LandrumM. (1997). Becoming architects of communities of learning: Addressing academic diversity in contemporary classrooms. Exceptional Children, 63, 269–282.
36.
TomlinsonC. A.TomchinE. M.CallahanC. M. (1994, April). Preservice teachers' perceptions of and responses to the differential needs of gifted students in their classrooms. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
37.
TomlinsonC. A.TomchinE. M.CallahanC. M.AdamsC. M.Pizzat-TinninP.CunninghamC. M. (1994). Practices of preservice teachers related to gifted and other academically diverse learners. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 106–114.
38.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (1988). Curriculum planning and development. In VanTassel-BaskaJ.FeldhusenJ.SeeleyK.WheatleyG.SilvermanL.FosterW. (Eds.), Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (pp. 23–52). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
39.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (2003). Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners: An introduction. In VanTassel-BaskaJ.LittleC. A. (Eds.), Content-based curriculum for high-ability learners (pp. 1–23). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
40.
WestbergK. L.ArchambaultF. X.DobynsS. M.SalvinT. J. (1993). The classroom practices observation study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 120–146.
41.
WestbergK. L.DaoustM. E. (2003, Fall). The results of the replication of the classroom practices survey replication in two states. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented Newsletter, 3–8.
42.
WhitlockM. S.DuCetteJ. P. (1989). Outstanding and average teachers of the gifted: A comparative study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 15–21.
