Factor analysis allows researchers to conduct exploratory analyses of latent variables, reduce data in large datasets, and test specific models. The purpose of this paper is to review common uses of factor analysis, provide general guidelines for best practices, illustrate these guidelines with examples using previously published self-concept data, and discuss common pitfalls and ways to avoid them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BryantF. B.YarnoldP. R. (1995). Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In GrimmL. G.YarnoldP. R. (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99–136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2.
ByrneB. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
ByrneB. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
CameronL. C.IttenbachR. F.McGrewK. S.HarrisonP. L.TaylorL. R.HwangY. R. (1997). Confirmatory factor analysis of the K-ABC with gifted referrals. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 823–840.
5.
CarrollJ. B. (1995). Reflections on Stephen Jay Gould's The Mismeasure of Man (1981). Intelligence, 21, 121–134.
6.
FeldhusenJ. F.DaiD. Y.ClinkenbeardP. R. (2000). Dimensions of competitive and cooperative learning among gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 328–342.
7.
HurleyA. E.ScanduraT. A.SchriesheimC. A.BrannickM. T.SeersA.VandenbergR. J.WilliamsL. J. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 667–683.
8.
KiefferK. M. (1999). An introductory primer on the appropriate use of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Research in the Schools, 6(2), 75–92
9.
MarshH. W. (1992). Self-Description Questionnaire-II manual. Cambellton, Australia: University of Western Sydney, Macarthur.
10.
MastenW. G.MorseD. T.WenglarK. (1995). Factor structure of the WISC-R for Mexican American students referred for intellectually gifted assessment. Roeper Review, 18, 130–131.
11.
PedhazurE. J.SchmelkinL. P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
PluckerJ. A. (1995). Measurement and structure of the self-concept of gifted adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
13.
PluckerJ. A.StockingV. (2001). Looking outside and inside: Self-concept development of gifted adolescents. Exceptional Children, 67, 535–548.
14.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
15.
ThompsonB.DanielL. G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197–208.