Many of the reports we read about qualitative research make use of succinct labels to describe the processes that are used in analyzing and reporting study results. The purpose of this paper is to make qualitative research more understandable by providing details about the procedures that were used in one project to develop grounded theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmstrongD. (1995). The use of kinetic school drawings to explore the educational preferences of gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 410–439.
2.
ColemanL. (2001). A “rag quilt”: Social relationships among students in a special high school. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 164–173.
3.
CrossT.ColemanL.Terhaar-YonkersM. (1991). The social cognition of gifted adolescents in schools: Managing the stigma of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 44–55.
4.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine DeGruyter.
5.
KrampenM. (1991). Children's drawings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
LincolnY.GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
LutzF.LutzS. (1980, April). Gifted pupils in the elementary school setting: An ethnographic study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Boston.
8.
MoonT. (1997, November). The relationship between school environment and instructional modifications for diverse learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Gifted Children, Little Rock, AR.
9.
SadkerM.SadkerD. (1994). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Touchstone Books.
10.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
