Literature on technological decline and related concepts is growing. We aim to advance theorizations of the dynamics of technological decline by mobilizing the concept of sociotechnical configuration and a metaphor of its “unraveling.” We take as a case study the declined Soviet computer series Ural. Ural was once among the top three most used computers in the former Soviet Union, but went into decline and got lost even before the dissolution of the country. We find that technological decline is not a trivial process, it is not guaranteed to be gradual but can feature sudden shifts. These shifts can be drops of production and loss of knowledge, as well as efforts to push back. Policy could make use of ongoing processes of decline and try to replicate the effect of the decline of Ural via cessation of access to materials and competences and delegitimation of the technology.
AbramovRomanAbramovaNadezhda. 2020. “From the Experimentation to the Unification: How the Transition to Unified Computer System Influenced the Professional Culture of the Soviet Computer Industry.” In Selected Papers 2020 5th International Conference on the History of Computers and Informatics in the Soviet Union, Russian Federation and in the Countries of Mutual Economic Assistance Council, SoRuCom 2020. doi: 10.1109/SORUCOM51654.2020.9464946.
3.
AllenRobert C.2001. “The Rise and Decline of the Soviet Economy.” Canadian Journal of Economics34 (4): 859–81. doi: 10.1111/0008-4085.00103.
4.
AyresRobert U. 1987. The Industry-technology Life Cycle: An Integrating Meta-model?Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA).
5.
BadrutdinovaMargarita Šamsutdinovna. 2009. “Istoriâ Žizni Zamečatel′nyh Lûdej Rossii—Bašira Iskandaroviča Rameeva, Ego Otca i Deda [The History of Remarkable People of Russia—Bašir Iskandarovič Rameev, His Father and Grandfather].” Russian Virtual Computer Museum. 2009. https://www.computer-museum.ru/galglory/rameev_hist.htm.
6.
BadrutdinovaMargarita ŠamsutdinovnaGuseevValerii FedorovičAbdrahmanovA.H.Maksimovič ÂkimovIgor′. 2014. “Rol′ Kazanskogo Zavoda ÈVM v Razvitii Vyčislitel′noj Tehniki i Informatiki v Rossii i v Stranah SÈV [The Role of the Kazan Computer Plant in the Development of Computing Technology and Informatics in Russia and Countries of Comecon].” In SoRuCom-2014 Proceedings. Third International Conference on the History of Computers and Informatics in the Soviet Union and Russian Federation: History and Prospects. IEEE: Kazan. https://www.sorucom.org/pdf/sorucom2014.pdf
7.
BezâevViktor Stepanovič.2018. “AO ‘NPP Rubin’—65 Let Sozdaniâ Sredstv Vyčislitel′noj Tehniki, Sistem i Kompleksov Upravleniâ [NPP Rubin—65 Years of Creating Computing Technology, Systems and Control Complexes].” Engineering Sciences4 (48): 5–9.
8.
CainFrank. 2005. “Computers and the Cold War: United States Restrictions on the Export of Computers to the Soviet Union and Communist China.” Journal of Contemporary History40 (1): 131–47. doi: 10.1177/0022009405049270.
9.
CallonMichel. 1990. “Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility.” The Sociological Review38 (1): 132–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954x.1990.tb03351.x.
CoCom. 1959. “Coordinating Committee Memorandum from the United States Delegation Concerning the Status of Soviet Electronic Computer Production.” General CIA Records (CIA-RDP62-00647A000100060013-2). CIA Electronic Reading Room. Accessed July 29, 2020. https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/document/cia-rdp62-00647a000100060013-2.
16.
DavidMartin. 2017. “Moving beyond the Heuristic of Creative Destruction: Targeting Exnovation with Policy Mixes for Energy Transitions.” Energy Research and Social Science33 (November): 138–46. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.023.
17.
ErshovAndrei P.Shura-BuraMikhail R.. 1976. “Puti Razvitiâ Programmirovaniâ v SSSR [Pathways of Development of Programming in the USSR].” Kibernetika6: 144–60.
GarudRaghuGehmanJoel. 2012. “Metatheoretical Perspectives on Sustainability Journeys: Evolutionary, Relational and Durational.” Research Policy41 (6): 980–95. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.009.
20.
GarynovA.2010. “Istoriâ Proizvodstva i Primeneniâ v Narodnom Hozâjstve SSSR Èlektronnovyčislitel′noj Tehniki v 50-80e Gg. XX v. [The History of Production and Application of Computer Technology in the USSR Economy in Years 50-80s of the 20th Century].” Izvestiâ Penzenskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogičeskogo Universiteta Imeni V.G.Belinskogo19: 75–84.
GeelsFrank W.2004. “From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-technical Systems: Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory.” Research Policy33 (6-7): 897–920. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015.
23.
GeelsFrank W.2007. “Feelings of Discontent and the Promise of Middle Range Theory for STS: Examples from Technology Dynamics.” Science Technology and Human Values32 (6): 627–51. doi: 10.1177/0162243907303597.
24.
GeelsFrank W.2011. “The Multi-level Perspective on Sustainability Transitions: Responses to Seven Criticisms.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions1 (1): 24–40. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.
25.
GeelsFrank W.TurnheimBrunoAsquithMikeKernFlorianKivimaaPaula. 2019. Sustainability Transitions: Policy and Practice. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
26.
GerasimovaEkaterinaChuikinaSof’ia. 2009. “The Repair Society.” Russian Studies in History48 (1): 58–74. doi: 10.2753/rsh1061-1983480104.
27.
GerovitchSlava. 2004. From Newspeak to Cyberspeak: A History of Soviet Cybernetics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
28.
GKNT SSSR (USSR State Commission for Science and Technology), and Akademiâ nauk SSSR (USSR Academy of Sciences). 1971. “Decision by the Research Council for Computer Technology and Control Systems…[Rešenie Naučnogo Soveta Po Vyčislitel′noj Tehnike i Sistemam Upravleniâ…].” Moscow, Russia: Polytechnic Museum Archive. Fond collection №27108/256.
29.
Gosplan RSFSR [RSFSR State Planning Commission]. 1974. “Spravka o Hode Vypolneniâ Rabot Po Soveršenstvovaniû Upravleniâ v Narodnom Hozâjstve RSFSR…[Note on the Progress of Upgrading the National Economy of RSFSR…].” Moscow, Russia: State Archive of the Russian Federation. Fond collection A262 16 2129.
30.
GouletFrédéricVinckDominique. 2017. “Moving towards Innovation through Withdrawal: The Neglect of Destruction.” In Critical Studies of Innovation: Alternative Approaches to the Pro-innovation Bias, edited by GodinBenoitVinckDominique, 97. Edward Elgar.
31.
GouletFrédéricVinckDominique, eds. 2022. Faire Sans, Faire Avec Moins. Les Nouveaux Horizons de l’Innovation. Paris: Presses de l’Ecole des Mines.
32.
HalikovD.M.1985. “Letter from Deputy Lead Engineer D.M. Halikov to the Head of the Main Directorate of Computing Technology and Control Systems of the State Commission on Science and Technology V.A. Mâsnikov.” Moscow, Russia: State Archive of the Russian Federation. Fond collection F221 27108/404.
33.
HansonPhilip. 2003. The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Economy: An Economic History of the USSR 1945–1991. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315841274.
34.
HarrisonMark. 2017. “The Soviet Economy, 1917-1991 Its Life and Afterlife.” Independent Review22 (2): 199–206.
35.
HessDavid J.SovacoolBenjamin K.. 2020. “Sociotechnical Matters: Reviewing and Integrating Science and Technology Studies with Energy Social Science.” Energy Research and Social Science65: 101462. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101462.
36.
HickelJasonKallisGiorgos. 2020. “Is Green Growth Possible?” New Political Economy25 (4): 469–86. doi: 10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964.
37.
HodakovViktor Egorovič.2010. Naučnye Školy Komp′ûterostroeniâ: Istoriâ Otečestvennoj Vyčislitel′noj Tehniki [Scientific Schools of Computer-building: The History of National Computer Technology]. Kherson, Ukraine: KhNTU.
38.
JasanoffSheila. 2018. “Just Transitions: A Humble Approach to Global Energy Futures.” Energy Research and Social Science35: 11–14. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.025.
39.
KangerLaur. 2021. “Rethinking the Multi-level Perspective for Energy Transitions: From Regime Life-cycle to Explanatory Typology of Transition Pathways.” Energy Research and Social Science71: 101829. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101829.
40.
KangerLaurSovacoolBenjamin KNoorkõivMartin. 2020. “Six Policy Intervention Points for Sustainability Transitions: A Conceptual Framework and a Systematic Literature Review.” Research Policy49 (7): 104072. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104072.
41.
KazakovaIrina A.2013. “Puti Razvitiâ Otečestvennogo Komp′ûterostroeniâ [The Development Pathways of Domestic Computer Building].” Prikladnaâ Informatika [Applied Computer Science]2 (44).
42.
Kazanskij zavod [Kazan plant]. 1965. “Kazanskij Zavod [Kazan Plant].” Moscow, Russia: State Archive of the Russian Federation. Fond collection R9527 1 763.
43.
KivimaaPaulaLaaksoSenjaLonkilaAnnikaKaljonenMinna. 2021. “Moving beyond Disruptive Innovation: A Review of Disruption in Sustainability Transitions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions38: 110–26. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.12.001.
44.
KleinHansKleinmanDaniel Lee. 2002. “The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations.” Science Technology and Human Values27 (1): 28–52. doi: 10.1177/016224390202700102.
45.
KoretskyZahar. 2021. “Phasing out an Embedded Technology: Insights from Banning the Incandescent Light Bulb in Europe.” Energy Research and Social Science82: 102310. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102310.
46.
KoretskyZ.2023. “Dynamics of technological decline as socio-material unravelling”. In KoretskyZ., et al. (eds) Technologies in Decline: Socio-Technical Approaches to Discontinuation and Destabilisation. Oxon: Routledge (In print).
47.
KoretskyZ.2022. Unravelling: The dynamics of technological decline. DataverseNL. doi:10.34894/KTHLRV.
48.
KoretskyZaharStegmaierPeterTurnheimBrunoVan LenteHarro, eds. Forthcoming. Technologies in Decline: Socio-technical Approaches to Discontinuation and Destabilisation. Oxon: Routledge.
49.
LevainAlixJolyPierre-BenoitBarbierMarcCardonVincentDedieuFrançoisPellissierFanny. 2015. “Continuous Discontinuation—The DDT Ban Revisited.” In International Sustainability Transitions Conference “Sustainability Transitions and Wider Transformative Change, Historical Roots and Future Pathways”. Brighton. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02507237/document
50.
LieMereteSørensenKnut H.. 1996. Making Technology Our Own? Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
51.
MalinovskyBoris Nikolaevich. 1995. “Syn Èpohi [Son of an Epoch].” In Istoriâ Vyčislitel′noj Tehniki v Licah [History of Computing Technology: Pioneers], 42. Kiev. Accessed July 27, 2020. http://www.ict.nsc.ru/jspui/bitstream/ICT/534/1/rameev.pdf.
52.
MalinovskyBoris Nikolaevich. 2010. Pioneers of Soviet Computing. Edited by FitzpatrickAnne. Translated byAronieEmmanuel. Self-Published.
53.
MarkardJochen. 2018. “The Next Phase of the Energy Transition and Its Implications for Research and Policy.” Nature Energy3 (8): 1–6. doi: 10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7.
54.
“Materialy Proverki Ispol′zovaniâ Vyčislitel′noj Tehniki Dlâ Naučnyh i Inženerno-Tehničeskih Rasčetov…[Review Materials on the Use of Computers in Scientific and Engineering Calculations…].”1965. Moscow: State Archive of the Russian Federation. Fond collection R9527 1 967.
55.
MecklingJonasNahmJonas. 2019. “The Politics of Technology Bans: Industrial Policy Competition and Green Goals for the Auto Industry.” Energy Policy126: 470–79. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.031.
56.
Ministerstvo avtomobil′nogo transporta i šossejnyh dorog RSFSR [Motor Transport and Highways Ministry of the RSFSR]. 1965. “Obosnovanie Zaâvki Na Cifrovye Vyčislitel′nye Mašiny [Justification for the Request of Digital Computing Machines].” Moscow, Russia: State Archive of the Russian Federation. Fond collection A409 1 1883.
57.
Naučno-tehničeskoe obŝestvo radiotehniki i èlektrosvâzi im. A.S. Popova [A.S. Popov Radiotechnics and Electric Communications Research Society]. 1973. “Razrabotka Analogo-Cifrovogo Kompleksa Na Baze ACÈMS-1 M i ‘Minsk-22’ [The Development of Digital-Analogue Complex Based on ACÈMS-1 M and ‘Minsk-22’].” In IV Vsesoûznaâ Konferenciâ Po Analogovoj i Analogovo-Cifrovoj Vyčislitel′noj Tehnike. Tezisy Dokladov [4th All-Union Conference on Analogue and Digital-Analogue Computing Technology. Theses of Reports]. Moscow, Russia: State Archive of the Russian Federation. Fond collection R5587 22 739.
58.
PavlyuchenkovSergei N.IsayAleksandr N.ZhendarevMikhail V.. 2020. “Designer of First Soviet Digital Computers B. I. Rameev.” Voenno-Istoričeskij Žurnal [Military History Journal]8: 80–84.
59.
Penzenskij Sovnarhoz [Penza Economic Council]. 1960. “Kal′kulâciâ Na Edinicu Izdeliâ [Calculation per Unit].” Moscow, Russia: State Archive of the Russian Federation. Fond collection A615 1 580.
60.
PetersBenjamin. 2016. How Not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet. Cambridge: MIT Press.
61.
PettigrewAndrew M.1997. “What Is a Processual Analysis?” Scandinavian Journal of Management13 (4): 337–48. doi: 10.1016/S0956-5221(97)00020-1.
62.
PettigrewAndrew M.1990. “Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice.” Organization Science1 (3): 267–92.
PrzhijalkovskiyViktor Vladimirovich. n.d.-a.“Operacionnye Sistemy ES ÈVM [Operating Systems of ES ÈVM].” Russian Virtual Computer Museum. Accessed July 30, 2020. https://computer-museum.ru/histsoft/oper_es.htm.
66.
PrzhijalkovskiyViktor Vladimirovich. n.d.-c.“Seriâ ÈVM ‘Minsk’ [ÈVM Series ‘Minsk’].” Russian Virtual Computer Museum. Accessed July 30, 2020. https://www.computer-museum.ru/histussr/55.htm.
67.
RameevBašir Iskandarovič. n.d.“Personal Notes. ‘Council of V. M. Glushkov.’” Moscow, Russia: Polytechnic Museum archive. Fond collection №27108/258.
RameevBašir Iskandarovič. 1966. “Sravnenie Mašin Tipa ‘Ural’ s Zarubežnymi Obrazcami [Comparing Machines of Type ‘Ural’ with Foreign Specimens].” Moscow, Russia: Polytechnic Museum Archive. Fond collection №27108/244.
70.
RameevBašir Iskandarovič. 1972a. “Notes of the Temporary Commission Meeting on 29/03/1972 (Second Meeting on Ural-25).” Moscow, Russia: Polytechnic Museum archive. Fond collection №27108/258.
71.
RameevBašir Iskandarovič. 1972b. “Predloženiâ Po Osnovnym Vyvodam Vremennoj Naučno-Tehničeskoj Komissii…[Suggestions on the Main Conclusions of the Temporary Scientific Commission…].” Moscow, Russia: Polytechnic Museum archive. Fond collection №27108/258.
72.
RevičÛrij VsevolodovičŠilovValerij Vladimirovič. 2017. “Sovetskaâ Vyčislitel′naâ Tehnika v Nepubličnyh Ocenkah Sovremennikov [Soviet Computing Technology in Private Evaluations by Contemporaries].” In SoRuCom-2017. Forth International Conference “Computer Technology in Russia and in the Former Soviet Union”, edited by TomilinaA. N., 308–13. Moscow. https://www.sorucom.org/pdf/SORUCOM_2017.pdf.
73.
RoggeKaroline S.JohnstonePhil. 2017. “Exploring the Role of Phase-out Policies for Low-carbon Energy Transitions: The Case of the German Energiewende.” Energy Research and Social Science33 (November): 128–37. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.004.
74.
RosenbloomDanielRinscheidAdrian. 2020. “Deliberate Decline: An Emerging Frontier for the Study and Practice of Decarbonization.” WIREs Climate Changen/a (n/a): e669. doi10.1002/wcc.669.
RussellAndrew L.VinselLee. 2018. “After Innovation, Turn to Maintenance.” Technology and Culture59 (1): 1–25. doi: 10.1353/tech.2018.0004.
77.
Russian Virtual Computer Museum. 2009. “Vospominaniâ o B.I. Rameeve Načal′nika Serijnogo Konstruktorskogo Otdela Kazanskogo Zavoda ÈVM V.I. Rogožina [Recollections about B.I.Rameev of the Head of the Department of Serial Manufacture at Kazan Computer Factory V.I.Rogožin].” https://computer-museum.ru/galglory/rameev_2.htm.
78.
SafronovAleksey V.2019. “The Gosplan Automated Planning System as a Necessary Step Toward the Nationwide Automated Data Processing and Control System (NACS).” Ekonomicheskaya Istoriya15 (4): 395–409.
ShoveElizabeth. 2012. “The Shadowy Side of Innovation: Unmaking and Sustainability.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management24 (4): 363–75. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2012.663961.
81.
ShoveElizabethPantzarMikaWatsonMatt. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. SAGE.
82.
SmirnovGennadij Sergeevič.2005. Semejstvo ÈVM “Ural”. Stranicy Istorii Razrabotok. [“Ural” Computer Series: Pages from the History of Development]. Accessed July 27, 2020. Unpublished manuscript. https://www.computer-museum.ru/books/ural.htm.
83.
SmirnovGennadij Sergeevič.2014. Rameevskaâ Škola Konstruirovaniâ ÈVM: Istoriâ Razrabotok v Fotografiâh, 1948-1972 Gg. [The Rameev School of Computer Design: History of Development in Photographs, 1948-1972]. Penza, Russia: PSU.
84.
SmolevitskayaMarina. 2019. “The Engineering Heritage of Bashir Rameev at the Polytechnic Museum: Honoring the 100th Anniversary of His Birth.” In Histories of Computing in Eastern Europe, edited by LeslieC.SchmittM.. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-29160-0_17.
85.
SovacoolBenjamin K.2016. “How Long Will It Take? Conceptualizing the Temporal Dynamics of Energy Transitions.” Energy Research & Social Science13: 202–15. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020.
86.
SovacoolBenjamin K.2021. “Who Are the Victims of Low-carbon Transitions? Towards a Political Ecology of Climate Change Mitigation.” Energy Research and Social Science73: 101916. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101916.
87.
SovacoolBenjamin KHessDavid J. 2017. “Ordering Theories: Typologies and Conceptual Frameworks for Sociotechnical Change.” Social Studies of Science47 (5): 703–50. doi: 10.1177/0306312717709363.
88.
StegmaierPeterKuhlmannStefanVisserVincent R.. 2014. “The Discontinuation of Socio-technical Systems as a Governance Problem.” In The Governance of Socio-technical Systems, edited by BorrásSusanaEdlerJakob, 111–31. Edward Elgar. doi: 10.4337/9781784710194.00015.
89.
StegmaierPeterVisserVincent R.KuhlmannStefan. 2021. “The Incandescent Light Bulb Phase-out: Exploring Patterns of Framing the Governance of Discontinuing a Socio-technical Regime.” Energy, Sustainability and Society11 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1186/s13705-021-00287-4.
90.
Svet. 2017. Legendarnyj Rameev [Legendary Rameev]. Penza.
91.
TargowskiAndrew. 2016. The History, Present State, and Future of Information Technology. Santa Rosa: Informing Science Press.
92.
TatarchenkoKsenia. 2017. “‘The Computer Does Not Believe in Tears’: Soviet Programming, Professionalization, and the Gendering of Authority.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History18 (4): 709–39. doi: 10.1353/kri.2017.0048.
93.
TatarchenkoKsenia. 2019. “‘The Man with a Micro-calculator’: Digital Modernity and Late Soviet Computing Practices.” In Exploring the Early Digital, edited by HaighThomas. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-02152-8_10.
94.
TaylorMargaretTaylorAndrew. 2012. “The Technology Life Cycle: Conceptualization and Managerial Implications.” International Journal of Production Economics140 (1): 541–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.07.006.
95.
“Tehničeskoe Zadanie Na Razrabotku Modifikacij Èlektronno-Vyčislitel′noj Mašiny Tipa ‘Ural’…[Specifications on the Development of a Midification of the Electronic Computer of Type ‘Ural’…].” 1971. Moscow: Polytechnic Museum archive. Fond collection №27108/253.
96.
TurnheimBruno. 2012. “The Destabilisation of Existing Regimes in Socio-technical Transitions: Theoretical Explorations and In-depth Case Studies of the British Coal Industry (1880-2011).” University of Sussex. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/41031/1/Turnheim%2C_Bruno.pdf.
97.
TurnheimBrunoGeelsFrank W.. 2012. “Regime Destabilisation as the Flipside of Energy Transitions: Lessons from the History of the British Coal Industry (1913-1997).” Energy Policy50 (November): 35–49. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060.
98.
TurnheimBrunoGeelsFrank W.. 2013. “The Destabilisation of Existing Regimes: Confronting a Multi-dimensional Framework with a Case Study of the British Coal Industry (1913-1967).” Research Policy42 (10): 1749–67. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.009.
99.
TurnheimBrunoSovacoolBenjamin K.. 2020. “Exploring the Role of Failure in Socio-technical Transitions Research.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions37: 267–89. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.09.005.
100.
TushmanMichael L.RosenkopfL.. 1992. “Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Towards a Sociology of Technological Evolution.” Research in Organizational Behavior14: 311–47.
101.
US Office of Technology Assessment. 1979. Technology and East-West Trade. Congress of the United States, Office of Technology Assessment. http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS29123.
102.
VerbongGeertGeelsFrank W.RavenRob. 2008. “Multi-niche Analysis of Dynamics and Policies in Dutch Renewable Energy Innovation Journeys (1970-2006): Hype-cycles, Closed Networks and Technology-focused Learning.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management20 (5): 555–73. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292719.
103.
YuDanHangChang Chieh. 2010. “A Reflective Review of Disruptive Innovation Theory.” International Journal of Management Reviews12 (4): 435–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00272.x.
104.
ZavodVÈM.1965. “Spravka o Zatratah Na Podgotovku Proizvodstva Vyč. Èlektronnyh Mašin ‘Ural-11’ i ‘Ural-14’ [Note on Expenses for the Preparation of Production of Computing Electronic Machines ‘Ural-11’ and ‘Ural-14’].” State Archive of the Russian Federation. Fond collection R9527 1 763.
