Selective reproductive technologies (SRTs), such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis, enable enhanced clinical success rates, create reproductive choices, and produce new commercial opportunities. Drawing upon empirical material acquired during a ten-month period in 2016, this study uses a total of twenty-two in-depth interviews with doctors, CEOs, clinical directors, marketing directors, patient counselors, and embryologists to discuss how traveling for the SRT of gender selection for nonmedical reasons is mediated by fertility clinics and clinicians in Dubai. Multimodal analysis was used to analyze the clinical websites’ key rhetorical and visual features. Meanwhile, interviews and observational studies highlighted the context within which gender selection takes place. Findings revealed that gender selection is promoted as a form of “enhancement” and “family balance,” which, when combined with the ways that Dubai is assembled as a sensory (fertility) tourist destination, routinize SRTs and lead to an understanding of gender selection as not merely an individualized reproductive journey but an optimization of the family unit.
BhatiaR.2018. “The Development of Sex-Selective Reproductive Technologies within Fertility, Inc. and the Anticipation of Lifestyle Sex Selection.” In Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century, edited by WahlbergA.GammeltoftT., 45–66. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
3.
BlythE.2010. “Fertility Patients’ Experiences of Cross-border Reproductive Care.” Fertility and Sterility94 (1): 11–15.
ClarkeA.ShimJ. K.MamoL.FosketJ. R.FishmanJ. R.. 2003. “Biomedicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and U.S. Biomedicine.” American Sociological Review68 (2): 161–94.
GinsburgF.RappR.. 1995. (Eds.). Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
GloverJ. 2006. Choosing Children: Genes, Disability, and Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
HangT. M.2018. “Coping with Sex-selective Abortions in Vietnam: An Ethnographic Study of Selective Reproduction as Emotional Experience.” In Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century, edited by WahlbergA.GammeltoftT., 27–44. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
13.
Health Authority of Abu Dhabi Legislation. 2008. Federal Law No. 11. Concerning Licensing of Fertilization Centers in the State of UAE. Accessed June 7, 2018. http://aafc.ae/media/1221/uae-law-english-version.pdf.
14.
HudsonN.CulleyL.BlythE.NortonW.RapportF.PaceyA.. 2011. “Cross-border Reproductive Care: A Review of the Literature.” Reproductive Medicine Online22 (7): 673–85.
15.
InhornM. C.2012. “Reproductive Exile in Global Dubai: South Asian Stories.” Cultural Politics8 (2): 283–306.
16.
InhornM. C.2015. Cosmopolitan Conceptions. IVF Sojourns in Global Dubai. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.
17.
KotsiF.MichaelI.. 2015. “Planning and Developing ‘Destination Dubai’ in the Context of the UAE.” In Planning for Tourism: Towards a Sustainable Future, edited by MorpethN.YanH., 149–68. Wallingford: CABI.
18.
KroløkkeC.2016. “ART in the Sun. Assembling Fertility Tourism in the Caribbean.” In Critical Kinship Studies, edited by KroløkkeC.MyongL.AdrianS.Tjørnhøj-ThomsenT., 149–66. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
19.
KroløkkeC.2018. Global Fluids. The Cultural Politics of Reproductive Waste and Value. New York: Berghahn Books.
20.
MarcusG.SakaE.. 2006. “Assemblage.” Theory, Culture and Society23 (2-3): 101–106.
21.
MartinE. 1994. Flexible Bodies. The Role of Immunity in American Culture from the Days of Polio to the Age of AIDS. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
22.
McGowanR.SharpR. R.. 2013. “Justice in the context of family balancing.” Science, Technology, & Human Values38 (2): 271–93.
23.
OngA.CollierS.. 2005. Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
24.
PatelT.2007. “Informal Social Networks, Sonography and Female Feticide in India.” Sociological Bulletin56 (2): 243–62.
25.
PauwelsL.2005. “Websites as Visual and Multimodal Cultural Expressions: Opportunities and Issues of Online Hybrid Media Research.” Media, Culture & Society27 (4): 604–613.
26.
PauwelsL.2012. “A Multimodal Framework for Analyzing Websites as Cultural Expressions.” Journal of Computer-Medicated Communication17 (3): 247–65.
27.
PetersenM.KroløkkeC.MyongL.. 2017. “Dad and Daddy Assemblage: Resuturing the Nation through Transnational Surrogacy, Homosexuality, and Norwegian Exceptionalism.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies23 (1): 83–112.
28.
PuarJ.2005. “Queer Times, Queer Assemblages.” Social Text84-85 (23): 121–40.
29.
RappR.2000. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus. The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.
30.
RappR.2018. “Foreword: The Egg Imaginary.” In Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century, edited by WahlbergA.GammeltoftT., v–viiiCham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
31.
RoseN.2007. The Politics of Life Itself. Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-first Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
ShenfieldF.de MouzonJ.PenningsG.FerrarettiA. P.Nyboe AndersenA.de WertG.GroossensV., The ESHRE Taskforce on Cross Border Reproductive Care. 2010. “Cross Border Reproductive Care in Six European Countries.” Human Reproduction25 (6): 1361–368.
33.
SpeierA.2016. Fertility Holidays: IVF Tourism and the Reproduction of Whiteness. New York: NUY Press.
van BalenF.InhornM. C.. 2003. “Son Preference, Sex Selection, and the ‘New’ New Reproductive Technologies.” International Journal of Health Services33 (2): 235–52.
36.
VertommenS.2016. “Towards a Political Economy of Egg Cell Donations: ‘Doing it the Israeli Way.’” In Critical Kinship Studies, edited by KroløkkeC.MyongL.AdrianS.Tjørnhøj-ThomsenT., 169–84. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield International.
37.
ViladrichA.Baron-FaustR.. 2014. “Medical Tourism in Tango Paradise: The Internet Branding of Cosmetic Surgery in Argentina.” Annals of Tourism Research45:116–31.
38.
WahlbergA.2018. Good Quality. The Routinization of Sperm Banking in China. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
39.
WahlbergA.GammeltoftT. M.. 2018. Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.
40.
WhittakerA. M.2011. “Reproduction Opportunists in the New Global Sex Trade: PGD and Non-medical Sex Selection.” Reproductive BioMedicine Online23 (5): 609–617.
41.
WilsonT.SurayaR. M. Y.. 2004. “The Tourist Gaze Goes On-line: Rojak (Hybrid) Reception Theory Structures and Ludic Looking at/from Malaysia.” Tourist Studies4:69–92.
